Name Rizki Malinda Isvaniari Putri
Title of the project Interdependence Mechanisms of Corporate Governance Effect in Multinational State-Owned Enterprises
1. Introduction
The state sectors have always been an important component of most economies. Recently, several state-owned enterprises (SOEs) are among the largest and fastest expanding multinational companies. They progressively compete with private firms for resources, ideas, and consumers in both domestic and international markets. Many countries manage SOEs where monopolies are treated desirable or natural. Private monopolists may produce and give price at levels which are not socially optimal, so SOEs will resolve this problem because government regulation can mitigate those though
…show more content…
As globalization scale increases, information processing and agency demands increase as well. Normatively, the design of corporate governance and accountability should be properly aligned with these firm-level globalization characteristics. Multinational SOEs must establish and execute a larger number of governance mechanisms and instrument to cope with globalizing needs and cross-country differences in governance norms.
Agency problems appear within a firm when managers have incentive to reach their own interests at shareholder expense. Several corporate governance mechanisms can reduce these agency problems and also increase firm performance (Agrawal and Knoeber, 1996). According to the definition of the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development, 2004), corporate governance is the mechanism by which business corporations are directed and controlled. Corporate governance involves a set of relationships between a company’s management, its board, its shareholders and other
…show more content…
Internal Mechanism of Corporate Governance
Internal mechanisms of corporate governance is the way of companies to conduct a controlling by use internal structure and process, in this research the internal mechanism will be measured by board size and CEO duality.
The number of directors constituting the board of a company can influence its performance positively or negatively. Larger board size provides more monitoring resources, which may enhance firm performance. Dalton et al. (1999) found the positive relationship between board size and firm performance. Otherwise, larger board size will affect coordination, communication, and decision making process become more difficult and trigger free-riding issues among the many board members. According to Eisenberg et al. (1998), there is negative relationship between board size and firm performance.
H1: The size of the board directors is negatively related to firm
Without crown corporations, there wouldn’t be gas or electricity services. Those things are usually seen as not profitable for private enterprises to undertake. Things like gas or electricity are demanded by so many people, if a private enterprise decided to take over, they wouldn’t make that much of a huge profit. Crown corporations consider consumers’ interests. The government will step in and establish crown corporations whenever they feel like the wants of their citizens are not met.
Monopolies would coordinate with other businesses to set prices and to set policies. One example is the railroad monopoly. Cornelius Vanderbilt controlled several railroad companies and soared into wealth. With a monopoly over the railroads, he was able to cut out the middle man by reducing the power of the individual managers. John D. Rockefeller also controlled a monopoly only his was in oil.
Firstly, a dominant CEO could be one of the possible factors triggering the unexpected collapse of DSE. According to agency theory, CEO is considered as an agent of the board and shareholders (Gallagher & Bennie, 2015), thus his decision might not maximise the principles’ interest (Rankin, Stanton, McGowan, Ferlauto, & Tilling, 2012, p. 190). Nick Abboud had successfully operated the company as can be seen from the 2014’s results (Dick Smith Holdings Limited, 2014). At late 2015, the decision of excessive discounted price during Christmas sales was made in order to boost sales growth (Rose & Hatch, 2016), and this plan was unable to generate the needed cash (Papadakis, 2016). It could be explained by Hamilton (2006) that the board becomes complacent from being allured by CEO’s previous success; thus, Nick Abbound might become a major part of making-decision process and could lead the company to the
We support the statement ‘Monopolies have led to the success of many economies in the world, and therefore, they should be maintained by government if they want their economies to continue enjoying economic growth and prosperity’. This is because monopolies are large in size, they benefit from economies of scale and are able to generate a huge amount of profit- larger than other market structures. With this money, they can invest in research & development, improving their existing products and creating new ones. Moreover, monopolies have a great impact on a country’s economy. Two very large monopolies that positively impacted the United States economy is Standard oil and Steel Company.
Market Structure - Oligopoly Oligopoly is a market structure whereby a few number of firms owns a lion’s share in the market. This market structure is similar to monopoly, except that instead of one firm, two or more firms have control in the market. In an oligopoly, there are no upper limits to the number of firms, but the number must be nadir enough that the operations of one firm remarkably influence and affects the others (Investopedia, 2003). The Walt Disney Company is categorized under an oligopoly market structure.
Business owners compete in a free market to make the best product or service at a price that will attract the most buyers. The successful businesses grow larger and employ more workers, thereby growing the economy. Proponents of the free market believe that this system encourages innovation, high quality goods, and increases the wealth of countries. The government does as little as possible in a free market economic
The freedoms that are hindered by these entities are the freedom to enter or not enter into a particular transaction by denying them any alternative and the freedom to not be affected by transactions in which you do not partake (Friedman, 1975). A monopoly deprives the consumer of the freedom of exchange; the consumer is forced to transact with a sole seller. Monopolies themselves come in different forms and deciding which monopoly will do less harm to the people, the monopolies need to be studied on a case-by-case basis. Most monopolies can be dealt with anti-trust laws to prevent them from coming to existence. Furthermore some monopolies need the government to stop supporting them in order to terminate its existence.
The oligopoly market is set up in a way so that competitors can survive because each is unique and there are so few competitors that they are virtually indispensable even if some ethics atrocity
Regulations that the government implement, licensing for example, increases the barrier of entry into the market and decreases ways for the traders to gratify consumer demand. This case is prevalent in the monopoly market. The market is sometimes best to decide how much and what to produce since it has better information and knowledge of the consumers compared to the government. Economic decisions may also not be competent when the government is motivated by political power rather than economic imperatives. Sometimes, economic policies are designed to retain power rather than to ensure maximum efficiency in the economy.
The government decides the amount of production and usage that they want which means that the goods and services can be produced in the quantities the government thinks best for the society. Government has the rights to change the price of goods and services. This means that where the production is controlled by a monopoly, customers will not be charged at higher prices in order for the monopoly to obtain higher profits. However one of the disadvantages of this economy is that there is no freedom of choice for producers or consumers. Hence, lack of incentives for workers resulting in low efficiency.
In the past few years, Multinational Corporation has become the most important character in globalization topic. Multinational corporation means an organization that owns sale their goods or service to more than single countries are rising at this age, moreover, these corporations almost come from developed countries (Allen Sens, 2012). In 20 to 21 centuries, considerably multinational corporations have chosen developing countries like China or India for continuous their business. However, is it bring economic benefit to developing country or make that worse? The aim of this essay is to examine some arguments for and against of multinational corporations in developing country
State-owned enterprises are difficult to penetrate for a foreign company like JPM. Employees with guanxi can minimize JPM’s costs, especially for government procedures, requirements and taxes. Connections add a significant measure of flexibility and freedom inside an authoritarian political system and is critical to JPM’s market access. Hiring the sons and daughter of these ruling elite give JPM immediate access to not just their connections but the connections of their parents as well. This is reflected in the hiring practices and the resultant connections with China Everbright and China Railway Group.
Introduction Globalization is a fact of Economic Life – Carlos Salinas De Gortari. Globalization is not a new thought. This process of interaction and integration among the companies, people and government of different countries is happening from ages. Technology has been the major driver of globalization. Economic life has been transformed dramatically by the advances in information technology.
A system to check and balances the benefit of all the board of directors and to avoid some of top management from making decisions that only benefit themselves is created and named corporate governance. Corporate governance means the system of rules, practices and processes by which a company is directed and controlled. The set of rules provided as a guidelines for the board of directors to make sure that accountability and fairness in a company’s relationship with its stakeholders such as financiers, customers, management, employees, shareholders and also society in order to achieve company’s goals and targets in a manner that add a value to the company. All of the stakeholders play an important role in corporate governance to ensure that
They are differentiated by their products such as soft drinks and soap powder. There also exist little firms who produce similar products such as petrol. However, in oligopoly, there are barriers to enter the market. Similar to monopoly, the barriers are no different, and it differs from one industry to the other. This is why the firms in oligopoly are interdependent with each other, because the firms all have large market shares and each of their actions would affect the rest, so any decision-making will be based on their competitors’ reactions.