Hevi Rahmania
016201400072
President University
Reitman, O. (1997). “Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critiques of International Human Rights”,100(1), 100-110.
The journal, “Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critiques of International Human Rights”, by Oonagh Reitman endeavors to address the critiques towards the International Human Rights from two different branches which are coming from cultural relativist and feminist. The addressed problem in this journal is despite the apparent tension between these two clashing critiques, there are similarities found in order for both to operate together.
Human rights are universal and simply applied by virtue of being human and culture has no place in it (Donelly 1989: 109-110). This journal starts by
…show more content…
Due to the repetitiveness and fairly confusing explanations, there are at least three arguments found in order to support the main idea. The first one is both critiques agree that human rights are and should not be universal. Both are criticizing the practice of International Human Rights however the relativist will further dispute on both theory and practice of International Human Rights. Feminist stresses that the practice of universality is still poor as only men’s right seems to be protected. Women have not been included in ‘human’ of human rights. Reitman provides supporting idea from the feminist campaign “Women’s Right as Human Rights”. In the other hand relativist believes that human rights are imbued by culture which is now dominated the international community. Human rights are viewed as modern form of imperialism of Western value. Therefore the similarities exists on how both critiques’ perception on the image of human rights. Feminist will see human rights as the image of men and relativist will see it as the image of the West. The second argument is each critiques have its own hidden agenda. Relativist argues on the feminism that national interest is in line with the feminism (Mayer 1995a: 184), states will use feminist cause to cover the motives to attack the enemy states. While feminist argues on the relativism that the attempt of relativist to protect the diversity of culture will just promote the dominance of male which has no sympathy to the well-being of women. Reitman concludes that human rights are made to prioritize a certain side. Supported by the study shows how certain countries have used the status of women to fulfill their political objectives. The third argument is both critiques have their own particular type of version in considerations of human rights. Feminist accuses the relativist by having male version of culture.
Human rights clearly include women’s rights and the fact that they are still considered as two different topics is disgraceful. In Aristotle’s Rhetorical logos are referred to as “the structure and content of text”. Clinton is able to associate women’s rights and human’s rights when she states that “If the term 'women 's rights ' were to be interchangeable with the term 'human rights ' the world community would be a better place because human rights effect the women who raise the world 's children, care for the elderly, run companies, work in hospitals, right for better education and better health care”. She wants to convince the audience to feel as if both phrases are identical to one another and uses logos to accomplish that. According to the data world bank, “approximately 50 percent of the world population is female”, and Clinton’s use of this logo allows the audiences’ perspective to change.
Right away they used such ideas of truths that would be self evident in the American ideology, “that all men and women are created equal; that they are endowed by their Creator with certain inalienable rights; that among these are life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness; that to secure these rights governments are instituted, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed” but explain that even though these ideas are the general consensus in America they still and have been undergoing many constraints and limitations to their rights. Furthermore, describe their futile efforts in making a change declaring it nearly impossible to impose any change ”Such has been the patient sufferance of the women under this government.” For them men have deprived them of their rights by denying them education, creating false public sentiment with a code of morals, and closed “all the avenues to wealth and distinction which he considers most honorable to himself.” As we can see, both movements relied heavily on using America's political ideas and imagery to point out hypocrisy and
The government expressed a lot of contempt toward different races (414). This partially explains the struggles of human rights in the U.S. This essay explains who the started the reproductive justice movement and how it came to be. It is a social movement that started with the help of W.O.C. Feminists describe woman rights as “human rights” (414) and it is 100% true. Women are human, men are human, we all deserve to have the same rights, equality in the justice system.
Words such as ‘unspoken assumption’, ‘insidiously’,‘exaggerating’, and “preoccupation” show suspicion towards the topic of women's rights and movements . In addition, the author also gives emphasis towards the downfall of men’s rights by including details such as “special privileges and protection to women” and “men’s supposed mistreatment of women”, thus showing how the author is directly opressed by the fight for equal rights. The author sees men's rights and their struggle with oppression as them being expected to have traditional cordial manners and fall into the traditional role of the patriarchy of the family, and decides to ‘debunk’ feminism by using these few points against a legacy of hatred, oppression, and misogyny that created
Human rights protection is alleged as an international affair and our rights values are euro-centrically influenced, according to the article. Jonathan Wolff’s article advocates for the need of balancing and protecting human rights, especially the second-generation rights as they are equally, if not the most essential to the first-generation
The women right movements that have been coming up are based on the standards and encounters of different endeavors to elevate social equity and to enhance the human condition. These endeavors are known as reforms. Women right movements are among the main rights movement that were developed in the early times. The individual and authentic relationships that met up, and often split separated the movements for women’s rights that existed since 1877, have advanced over the ensuing century. To give a clear unfolding of events on women’s movements, the essay will attempt to analyze for events that had a positive change on women and their status in the world.
One example Mohanty provides in which “women” is used as a category of analysis is in the research of Perdita Huston, where she describes women in the Third World countries have "needs and problems, but few if any have choices or the freedom to act” (30). Mohanty argues that the usage of “women” in this context is problematic because the statement assumes that there is a universal unity for women, and ignores the differences among various ethnic groups and their history. The historical backgrounds become much more complex for women from different countries and it leads to varying views. For the conclusion, she revisited the first few chapters after sixteen years they were published and addresses responses from others on her essays. She further on instills the ideas of how feminism should be intersectional for all groups and not just for a select few.
“Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critique of International Human Rights- Friends or Foes?” The journal, “Cultural Relativist and Feminist Critique of International Human Rights- Friends or Foes?” by Oonagh Reitman have the aim to know deeper about the two critiques towards the universal Human Rights by the two major theory, which are the Cultural Relativism and Feminism, how they see the universal Human Rights theory. The Journal address for the workshop discussion matter regarding to the similarities on critique of International human rights that made by the Cultural relativist and the feminist. “ Human Rights is the right that given and held by human simply because they are human, and it does not classified nor held by certain groups or not the subject to variation in culture”(Donnelly 1989: 109-110) From the introduction in the journal, the writer defines how the feminist and the cultural relativist express their idea of Universal human rights. The idea of Universal human rights from Donnelly were being reserve by Relativist, they argue that the human rights itself root from culture and due to the variation of culture, making the human rights not universal.
The concept is particularly significant for the minority groups, females and to the poor. In reference to the Feminist Legal aspects, women must be treated equally as men regardless of different aspects including race, gender, national origin, ethnic group, religion and capabilities without any discrimination and biasness. In context of modern equality feminist legal theory, women are entitled to have equality before the law and should be discriminated based on gender. Finally, it determines that with enhancing globalisation and improvement of human rights discourses, equality and dominance in feminist theory started to be
Introduction In this article, Eric Poser has elaborated several reasons which made human rights a failure in international legal regime. The most highlighted issues are hypocrite policies of US and EU which has directly questioned credibility and integrity of their law and justice. The second reason is role played by Russia and China, the two major economic powers who in order to sustain their power, are involved in human rights violations. The third most important reason is standardized model of Universal Declaration of Human Rights which is ideal but not practical in various countries.
Throughout history, there have been many examples where groups of people have been denied their human rights. Individuals, groups, and governments have attempted to end many of these human rights violations although they have not always been successful. One event from history that can immediately be dissected from many other events that stripped humans of their basic rights is the deadly and horrible Holocaust which mainly took place in Germany during World War II and discriminated against the Jewish population. The German dictator at the time of WW2, Adolf Hitler, hated Jews and believed they were the reason for all the bad things happening to Germany such as the bad economy and the loss in WW1. The circumstances that led up to the Holocaust
This chapter gives an overview of issues that paves the way for a clearer understanding of the research problem and identifies the knowledge gap this study seeks to fill. The literature review first discusses the concept of cultural relativism and then interpretative methodologies in contemporary Islam. This chapter first will specify the relationship between cultural relativism and human rights show the conflict between cultural relativism and universality of human rights, and, finally, argue for helpful approaches that aim at reconciling cultural relativism and universalism. Second, with regard to the second section (Islamic interpretative methodologies), this chapter will explain how traditional interpretations misunderstand and exploit
They are the rights of individuals. Each of these characteristics present challenges” (Freeman, 2011, p.68) Domestic violence is a major concern that effects women throughout the world, however, it was recently perceived as a human rights issue. The Western cultural ideas about privileges of people to self-governance and opportunity led to the advancement of human rights. Thus, the overall human rights law were created to guarantee individuals' autonomy versus the state.
Society views men and women differently in many ways. Men are usually recognized as the leaders and dominant ones. But, women are viewed worthless in business and only great at housework. In the book We Should All Be Feminists, by Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie, she argues how there is a problem with gender and a feminist is a man or woman who will take action to change that problem. Adichie argues that women’s rights are human rights and both genders should approach change together.
Introduction Human rights are understood as rights which belong to an individual as a consequence of being human and for no other reason. Hence human rights are the rights people are entitled to simply because they are human beings, irrespective of their citizenship, nationality, race, ethnicity, language, gender, sexuality, or abilities; human rights become enforceable when they are codified as Conventions, Covenants, or Treaties, or as they become recognized as Customary International Law. No one needs to possess a qualification in order to enjoy their human rights. It is important that one exercise their human rights otherwise they would feel like their “rights” are being infringed upon. Human rights are mandated to protect citizens and to ensure that all citizens are catered for.