International Dispute Resolution

Law is one of the most essential elements of society and community that help people as well as authorities to maintain a balance in their life. However, there is a vast difference between law and international law especially in regards of its implementation and practices. In accordance with the international law, states linked with each other have legal responsibility to avoid any type of dispute or conflict among each other and in case of any dispute; states are legally bound to legally resolve their issues by means of diplomatic or judicial means to avoid any legal or political issue among the state. The research paper aims to evaluate the United States or countries Charter of settling Inter-state dispute in regards of diplomatic dispute

However, in international dispute settlement, inquiry is one of the most oldest and effective technique to resolve conflict or dispute among different parties. Most of the international conflicts incorporate difference of opinion upon different facts, unbiased 3rd party that helps the parties to resolve conflict, especially in regards of conciliation commission or arbitral tribunal or in regards of court of law or United Nation that tries to resolve the issues on the facts that are collected by means of detailed and in-depth inquiry. However, in regards of law, the term inquiry is related to detailed inquiry or negotiation that clarifies the concerns of both the parties within a conflict on the basis of certain facts and

In other words, it is observed that in some case, negotiation are obligatory for parties so is to resolve the issues, while in other cases, it is up to the understand and preference of involved parties to choose negotiation as a tactic to resolve the issue or not. Under the 1997 Convention on Watercourses, upon the solicitation of one party there is a commitment to negotiate, unless the parties have conceded to another method for dispute or conflict resolution that is according to the Article 33 of UN Charter. The obligation to negotiate might even have its premise in standard international law, for incidence, the commitment to negotiate on the delimitation of the mainland rack between States with inverse or neighbouring countries. In spite of the fact that this standard has its origin in traditional law, it is additionally perceived as a major aspect of the standard law. Negotiations can occur at various levels, for occurrence, between practiced or authoritative organisations, or in between the ministry of foreign affairs of different countries or states, between negotiators or summit conferences among international dispute participants. Every level has its favourable circumstances and