Two Theories Of International Relations Essay

1886 Words8 Pages

The following assignment focuses on international relations. The assignment is divided into two parts. The first part deals with defining international relations and the impact of globalisation. The second part of the assignment elaborates on the theories of international relations.
BODY
PART 1
INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
There are countless definitions of the term international relations subject to the context one would be referring to. We could say, according to Patrick McGowan , that international relations is the study of how authority and or power is used to organise and manage trans-border relations between actors, and how this contributes to the establishment, maintenance and transformation of order in the world system. (2006:13) we could …show more content…

This affects me because I might be at a disadvantage with regards to perhaps my specific qualifications. I will not be paid my worth.
PART 2
THEORIES OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS
Theories of International Relations are the formal academic results of the activity of thinking systematically about our assumptions concerning the cross- border interaction between actors, and the broader public-policy implications of these interactions. (Mc Gowan, 2006:27)
The theories are divided into three categories, namely, (1) Realism, (2) Idealism and (3) Marxism. These shall be discussed with relation to the following subcategories of the assumptions; (a) Anarchy, (b) Power, (c) Morality, (d) Role of States and (e) Continuity.
REALISM (Mc Gowan, 2006: 29-31)
Realists are also termed as the sceptics. They believe that the state 's main objective is to attain power and to maintain it.
ANARCHY
In terms of anarchy, the realists believe that states are selfish actors who seek to maximize their own interests at the expense of the other states. Realists believe that it is perfectly rational for states to look out for their own interests exclusively. They believe in the decentralisation of

Open Document