Parents should be educated about the potential dangers of the internet and to pass down the information to their children cautioning them about the inappropriate material the internet may contain if accidentally stumbled upon. Additionally, their children should be informed about the reason why being exposed and desensitized to the harmful content of violent behavior, profanity, or sexual behavior at a young age is not appropriate. Parents should also well-educate their children about the distinct forms of entertainment and how it is strictly for entertainment purposes only. The way Ellison perceives the show, “Happy Tree Friends,” as an entry to viewing of violence is biased. By labeling the show as a threat to children, it validates the negative effects on young children.
Kara’s strongest argument was that adopting the resolution is a violation of the 1st Amendment, freedom of speech etc. She justified her argument by providing evidence that adopting the resolution is unconstitutional because it has not made it through the US Supreme Court, thus the government has little control on media violence. This went against Corissa’s argument that if the government can have control over children watching pornography then the same control should be implemented for children watching media violence. This is an example of an argument from principle because it appeals to values such as justice or equality (Herrick). Furthermore, I believe Corissa won the debate.
This takes place around the world on most social media sites. This issues can affect anyone but it most commonly affects teenagers. Schools should be concerned because bullying might affect students that attend their school and it can also impact how they function at school. Cyberbullying happens all the time and their are many victims, Schools have been stepping in and trying to help but some people say that schools have no right to do anything
I agree when Coben says “Trust is one thing, but surrendering parental responsibility to a machine that allows the entire world access to your home borders on negligence” (1). Because when you, as a parent, allow your child to do whatever he/she pleases to do, you begin to put your child in harm's way. Although allowing your child to do certain things without having to get parental permission, there are things that can be harmful to a child without the child thinking about it. Although spyware is a GREAT idea, don’t completely invade their privacy because they will get antsy and may resort to extreme measures to get around their parents' surveillance. Most teenagers find their time of seclusion when they are on their phones.
All of the above mentioned points are unethical and is considered a crime in most of the states. Everything is just a click away from you, this is mostly used for a negative purpose. For example if a kid reads about some incident on social media but its content may not be appropriate for him but he can easily access that while just typing it on google. Most of the teenagers are involved in unethical activities and smartphones have made it easy for them to continue these unethical activities which is not only destroying our culture but also causing different diseases. Most of the kids like to stay at home and spend their time on social media or playing games on smartphones rather than going out and doing physical activities, this results in several health issues in them due to lack of exercise like obesity.
The lack of protection could make them vulnerable to the harsh world of the internet. Harsh people these days tend to show no mercy since they could care less about the opposing person 's feelings. Other than that, they become influenced to continue wrongdoings because others encourage it through their actions. Not only does the internet encourage violence, it can change the thought process of children. In usual cases, children tend to instantly believe almost everything that seems to make sense to them.
It might be more advisable to warn the consumer rather than prohibit it. In the 21st century demands of prohibition of porn come mostly from feminists who label it as degrading, endangering and harming for women. If we can prove that Pornography does violate rights, those would be grounds to limit it. But while it can certainly be proven in the case of underage children, it is harder to make this point with consenting adults. If the conditions of the Porn Industry are bad, it is advisable to control and regulate the industry rather than prohibit
An article published by BBC News UK states that almost one out of five children have at some point experienced to be bullied online. These dangers are only som of many dangers youths may have to deal with in the world because of the technology. Despite of the dangers to brows the internet, the web can also be a great source for information and pleasure, but it is important to know the risks as well. Just because there are some dangerous things about the web. It dont mean you should stop using it.
In conclusion Censorship has played a very effective role in society, government and our social media, but it’s affecting a lot more than just that. What role does censorship play in America and what guidelines should be used to ban books, videos, and articles written produced for public
Many of our youth are mimicking what they see. The youth are using these types of words and portraying these images of profanity and unacceptable behaviors more frequently. Censorship will only help prevent more children from being affected by profanity, nudity, obscenity and violence currently allowed on television. It endangers are future because the children are the future of the world. These violent words and images allowed over our national TV makes it hard for children to know the difference between fake physics and zombies.
According to Sharedhope.org, almost three in ten parents (29%) let their children use the internet without any restrictions or supervision. In the article, “The Undercover Parent, ” the author Harlan Coben talks a lot about the dangers of the internet. Also on how spyware is a crucial part of parent responsibility. I agree with Coben that with the evolution of technology comes the evolution of technology protection. The internet can be a dangerous place and then again there are millions of children and teens roaming it freely.
Cyber bullying can end a child as easily as adults can destroy a child hood. Why would we allow this if we know we, the children, are our future. If we want to succeed in the world we should help our fellow humans to make it so we can be just as great. We do not need to bring each other down just to feel
We all know that Cyberbullying is a decently sized problem, but real bullying is the most prevalent bullying issue today, right? Wrong. Over 90,000 kids will stay home from school because they have been bullied online, this out numbering the 70,000 by physical bullying. Children in the US are deeply manipulated by cyberbullying today because of our growing use of technology. This allows cyberbullying to sneak into our everyday lives without noticing it.
That’s why social media is bad for our society if u can just think about it kids, teens, and adults all post things like their pictures their location and sometimes where they live on social media. So if and criminal or and sexual predictor gets your information and try to kill you or rob you it will be all your fought because you gave up your information but if you not on social media sites you will be safe