The general argument made by Melinda D. Anderson in her work “How Internet Flirting Hurts Kids,” is that full student access to the Internet has become limited by excessive censorship by school districts. More specifically, Anderson argues that districts are enforcing too many barriers on the Internet that it can barricade a student’s ability to learn. She writes, “the pernicious practice by school districts of overzealous Internet censorship” has been used too much that it does not simply keep students safe from obscene content, instead it obstructs knowledge. Censorship on YouTube for example, creates a barrier for students to learn from tutorials or lectures online. In this passage, Anderson is suggesting that districts are overusing their
“In-Forming”, an app described as an individual 's ability to provide themselves with their own personal supply chain of information, knowledge, and entertainment, has impacted Danville by decreasing the amount of effort students have to put into their work and assignments, and by giving every person in Danville access to others in and out of the small town. Students of the Danville Area School District used to have to lug around large textbooks for every class, go to the library to find information for assignments, and write with actual writing utensils, but now, because of the world wide web, old standards required for learning have “left the building.” With a simple search for a textbook title on “Google,” students are able to access large
While in the developing stages of life children should not be exposed to things like violence, racism, sexism, porn, and inappropriate language. In a “Kids USA Survey,” Scholastic Magazine, children took an essay to see what they thought should be censored in their life, 53.1% of children in the United States voted that censorship protects them from content inappropriate for them. 6,000 votes both girls and boys voted that some censorship was needed. Parents should be responsible for censoring what their children see. Schools should also block any content they would see dangerous.
In the article “ Let Kids Run Wild Online”, Boyd describes the situation in which many parents currently find themselves in at an age of a technology-soaked world. Many parents are constantly contemplating the pros and cons of letting kids run free on the internet or retaining their freedom from being involved in the world. However the various pros that outweigh the cons, such as developing reliable communication skills definitely suggest kid should be able to explore the internet without having many limitations. Many would say Boyd surely has a strong point within this article. Due to our world relying on technology, kids should definitely be allowed to navigate the internet at a level of high trust and support to an agreeable extent.
I believe that the author’s thesis is about the issue of censorship and how it impacts our First Amendment. The author presents us a two different perspective of the issue. Such as, our practice of our First Amendment can lead us to a place where someone can create materials that we may find offensive. But are protected by the First Amendment at the same time could have people who want to limit offensive material and therefore, through censorship are limiting the First Amendment rights of others. To demonstrate her point, Susan Jacoby, interviewed a small sample of women to gather their perspective about an image from a Playboy magazine.
Author Peggy Orenstein discusses how the internet, particularly social media sources, has an influence in the lives of young women. Orenstein focuses on the topic of sexting and whether it is considered freedom of expression and sexual power or cultural abuse. Sexting has been a taboo conversation point among society. They believe that it isn’t something to be discussed, just something that you should already know. Unfortunately, not educating young people about the damaging effects of sexting yields irrevocable results.
They Say, I Say: Chapter Thirteen Exercise 1: • Conventional wisdom claims that internet use is harmful for the brain, and that Americans, mostly millennials, spend too much time on social media and other forms of the Web. In Chapter Thirteen of “They Say\I Say”: IMHO, Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein explains the debate of social media and its effect on students’ ability to read, write, and communicate, also explain that conversations that occur on the Web are not real conversations. Technology is a tool; it should not overwhelm the user. The internet not a dynamic entity with malign or benign intent. The proper utilization of it, however, has improved educations and it should be viewed as a accomplishment of the human mind for improving the human mind. Technology, and most often the Internet, is construed as a malign unit, whose purpose is to corrupt and stultify thought.
Censorship is dangerous, and too much of it can lead to an inevitable destruction of our
Censorship in Todays America Censorship has been a topic of debate for decades. Despite the existence of the First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of speech, the United States has a long history of censoring literature. Most Americans believe that it is unethical to stifle freedom of expression, but often some of the First Amendment’s biggest supporters are its worst enemies. It shocks many to see how rampant it still is in the present day. This paper will show examples of how governments, religious institutions, and schools try to limit first amendment rights through censorship.
Humanity needs to change before all information is censored. In “College at Risk,” Andrew Delbanco discusses liberal learning and the “whole person” that may not be developed in college due to a lack of income. Liberal learning develops the “whole person” by teaching the basic ethics and morals a person should have. Anne Applebaum presents examples of censorship in her essay, “The Decline of American Press Freedom.” She uses China and Yale to make the point that differing forms of censorship are doing more harm than good.
Censorship in America can vary between the silencing of young voices and the prevention of exposing others of inappropriate material. Many people are afraid of losing their freedom of speech, as first amendment rights should be mandatory for American citizens. Polar to this argument insists the importance of censorship, as it can shield the public from information that can lead to fear or chaos. Leaving students ignorant to world problems, however, is argued by Sonja West that it removes their first amendment rights and creates a future working-class of Americans who are clouded from the truth. West is a law professor at the University of Georgia who is distinguished for her expertise in the first amendment law and minor in journalism.
In today’s modern society technology plays a huge role in everyday life. Technology has a big position in education. Today students use laptops for school on an everyday basis to take notes, work on assignments, and research. Many people agree that, when it comes to education, technology can either be very harmful or very helpful. Timothy D. Snyder, a history professor at the University of Yale has written five award-winning books.
Some people say that social media is dangerous for kids because it changes their behaviors and more importantly it affects their learning for school. It is dangerous because, they never know who they are chatting with online. Social media changes children 's behaviors because they do unhealthy things that are intended for people over 18 years of age. It also affects their education in a bad way by using abbreviations or slang that threatens their skills in writing. However, others say that social media is beneficial for kids because researchers see them expressing themselves on it.
Students are constantly using the internet as a way to communicate, conduct research, and a vast majority of other activities that are made available to them through this convenient resource. However, in many occasions, a student is unable to perform important research due to filters that stand in their way. Not everyone has personal internet resources, and it is important that everyone has access to credible information. Schools should provide unfiltered internet access. Students should be provided with unfiltered internet access because filters do not do an adequate job of filtering.
Assignment2: Counter-Argument outline I. Introduction: A. Rhetorical questions: - but where do the boundaries lie between safeguarding and surveillance? -to snoop, or not to snoop? B. .Name of writer: Judith Woods C. Name of article: Should Parents Spy on Their Children’s Emails and Texts? D. Central claim: parents should spy on and monitor their children’s texts and emails.
Living in the modern era makes social media become part of our life. Basically, social media are used for communication and social interaction. Based on the Merriam-Webster, social media are forms of electronic communication (as websites for social networking and microblogging) through which users create online communities to share information, ideas, personal messages, and other content (as videos). There are lots of social media that people use nowadays such as Instagram, Twitter, Facebook, Snapchat, Path, and others. Most of people probably have two or more social media’s accounts.