According to article “Does the Internet Make you Dumber” by Nicholas Carr, the internet takes our concentration and focus. Studies show that, traditional linear text readers understand more than who read online. There was an experiment at Cornell University, and that experiment shows that who used the internet did worse on their job than who did not used the internet. We are losing ability to think more deeply and our concentration about our lives. Books let us focus on the reading while internet distracts us from reading. Reading a book makes us smarter because reading makes our brain stronger. Author also mentions that, if you do not like reading a book then you can go back to your wild life, fighting animals. There are two ideas from the …show more content…
Article states that we are sacrificing our power to concentrate because of using the internet in this quote “It seems that we are sacrificing our ability to practice quiet concentration and thought with all our surfing and searching on the internet.”(Par 4) Again, I strongly disagree with this quote because I can concentrate pretty well when I am surfing on the internet. Well, according to the article I have no concentration. But as I can see, I can concentrate. The article was biased, that is why I do not believe everything in this article. If you ever feel like you cannot concentrate just search “how to concentrate” on the internet. It will give you tips and tricks to concentrate. Look how creative I am. We do not sacrifice our concentration when we surf on the web, we are just doing our work in a fun way. Most of the time I dislike doing one thing at a time, like just reading a book. I like multitasking, and I cannot multitask while I am reading a book. I read my books online and by reading online I can multitask, concentrate and have fun while I am reading it. As a conclusion the article states that reading book is more beneficial than surfing on the web. Surfing on the internet takes our concentration. The internet surfers are less productive and creative than the book readers. In my opinion this article is biased and some of the information is untrue. We are using the Internet for more than 20+ years. If the
In the book, The Shallows, Carr explains how people think they can not reach their full potential without the internet. ”The net also provides a high system for delivering response and rewards. (Pg. 117)” Because the internet can allow people to talk to each other in a matter of seconds, people are always distracted by their
The purpose of Carr’s essay is to raise skepticism of the internet and the influences it has on the mind. The internet has become a part of my daily regimen. Online is where my homework
Is technology changing our brains for the better or for the worse? The human brain is a biological masterpiece and is the most advanced organ on the face of the planet. In Richard Restak’s essay “Attention Deficit: The Brain Syndrome of Our Era,” he speaks about how the advancements in technology in this modern era have affected the brain’s habits and functions. Multitasking is requiring the brain to change how it functions, its organizations, and efficiency throughout day-to-day tasks and is also enabling people to do things otherwise not possible. Within the past two decades, the amount of time we spend on using technology has increased by a large amount.
Our concentration and contemplative skills have diminished thanks to our internet usage. Carr states that: “For me, as for others, the Net is becoming a universal medium, the conduit for most of the information.” Information is easily accessible and no longer requires deep research. You can easily find the idea of something on the internet by skimming it. Carr believes that our mind can be shaped by using the internet daily and could be completely different than those who read books/magazines/newspapers etcetera.
The world is evolving at an alarming rate and the internet is at the center of this advancement. Nicholas Carr wrote the literary piece “ The Shallows” in which Carr explains his views on how the internet is hurting human beings rather than helping them. A few points that Carr goes into detail about, are how the internet is causing the attention span of average people to slowly decay. Carr also explains that due to the internet, people are tending to skim through what they are reading rather than reading the full text they are searching for the key points in each price of writing. Additionally Carr points out that the internet is causing relationships between people are becoming weaker due to the lack of face to face interactions between each other.
One of the topics Nicholas Carr brings up is the downfall of books. Back then, when there wasn't internet and all the technology we have today, people were able to focus and read a book cover to cover. Now that there’s internet in our lives it is harder for people to stay focused and have the patience to read the book cover to cover when they know that they have the internet to their disposal. I disagree with Nicholas Carr and think that internet is good because it is very helpful in our everyday lives.
People searching for immediacy and skimming through texts might play a role in the lessening of attention spans but it seems to be more of a product of choice and self discipline, rather than a product of using the Internet. Carr’s argument about the Internet causing these effects on cognition seems to be an excuse for an individual’s own habits. Sometimes, I almost feel the need to be distracted and compelled to check my phone, email, Facebook etc. However, I found that to be my choice. Whenever I tell myself that I need to get work done before indulging in an Internet-savvy society or when I put my phone somewhere that is out of sight, my urge to use technology has diminished almost completely because of the self discipline I have enforced.
In today’s society, technology plays a very important role in its ability to function, it helps people find information, communicate with others far away and provides entertainment. In “Fahrenheit 451”, a book written by Ray Bradbury, a dystopian future where books have been made illegal is presented. In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr, raises many questions about technology and its effects on society. It’s quite evident that we have become quite dependent on technology due to our overconsumption of it.
Clay Shirky, the author of “Does the internet make you smarter?” wrote about how ignorance has poisoned the internet with incorrect information. Not only does technology has its flaws, but so do books and novels dating back to the Protestant Reformation. Even though many people are against the internet Shirky reassures that if used correctly and appropriately, then it can become a very useful tool that can “tap our cognitive surplus”. The increased collaboration of technology is important to society for the reason that the internet is full of valuable knowledge that can be claimed very quickly and easily. Increased collaboration is absolutely a benefit.
The internet has made it so much easier to find new information, if only we wouldn 't get so sidetracked. There is no reason to get rid of the use of technology, but we need to find a way for us to discipline ourselves to only use it for our
He starts his argument by telling us the effect the internet has had on him and others he has come across. The internet has changed his train of thought and his ability to focus and concentrate. He believes our brains have been reprogramed over time to adjust to the speed and convenience of the internet. Our ability to retain and digest traditional media has also been compromised since we are used to receiving information so rapidly. This is a strong opening argument for his essay.
Our way of thinking is beginning to change to the way that computers do. Advancements are made everyday. These new advancements are attempting to make life in general easier for everyone. Nicholas Carr makes the claim that, “as the internet because our primary source of the information it is affecting our ability to read books and other long narratives.” Carr suggests that using the internet is altering the way that our minds operate.
According to this statement the readers can conclude that the main reason for reading concentration disturbance is the internet. In terms of the scientific research, the article provides the research by the British Library and U.K educational consortium which states “They found that people using the sites exhibited ‘a form of skimming activity,’ hopping from one source to another rarely returning to any source they’d already visitied” (Carr, 2008). From this statement we can understand that there are numbers of attractive information piled on one page, people have a hard time choosing which one to read, resulting them to skim and jump to one another. From these couple examples, it can be concluded that the author of this essay is strongly attempting to convince the readers in his idea of internet disturbing people’s concentration. However, the essay itself is extremely biased, because of the fact that there is no information about benefits of using the internet and reading online.
Nicholas Carr's argument against the internet was very strong, and it persuaded me. It is very difficult for me to go against his opinion. I agree that the internet is changing us, but not in ways we think. There are long-term effects of using the internet as often as we do. He states that the internet is changing the way our brains function such as having a shorter attention span, negatively changing the way we critically think, and negatively changing our reading skills.
It is like this that books expand our knowledge, conception and consciousness of the world around us. You may say that nowadays there are other ways to do that, like the TV or Google, but books allow you to experience the same story form your own perspective, values, ideas and from your own feelings. Through reading, you introduce yourself to new things, new information, and even new ways to solve a problem. Secondly, reading helps us to