ipl-logo

The Importance Of Internet Rules And Regulations

1040 Words5 Pages

The internet is a important resource for many people and businesses across the entire world. Many companies rely on the internet for their business, and many people rely on it to perform everyday tasks. In the United States there is a debate about the current state of net neutrality rules and regulations. Net neutrality is the basis that all legal content on the internet should be treated equally, meaning that Internet Service Providers, henceforth shall be referred to as ISPs, can not block, discriminate against, or throttle a website, making a slower or faster connection to a website, even certain websites that might compete with their own (Congressional Research Service). With more media sharing and streaming websites getting bigger, such …show more content…

In their statement, Charter lists several reasons why they will continue to support the removal of the current regulations. The main reason they supported the repeal of the current regulations is so that newer more permanent guidelines can be put into motion and set into place (Charter Communications). The Communications Act of 1934 was simply outdated by current technology and newer legislation can help to fix that issue. Charter also claims that with this repeal they will be able to invest billions of dollars improve their technology and infrastructure, to innovate and bring services to more rural areas of the United States (Charter Communications). Therefore, the repeal of the current regulations would be beneficial to their customers as well. Another reason the Charter supported the removal is according to them Title II of the Communications Act of 1934 provides broad and vague terminology (Charter Communications). In business, broad terms can be your best friend, or your worst nightmare it all depends on perspective and what a judge might believe if it would be taken as far. Although Charter may not support the regulations the way that they were, just like all businesses, their customers are an essential piece of their business. In their statement they say that they will continue supporting for an equal internet and are not going to change the company’s policies that include guidelines for net neutrality (Charter Communications). Therefore the removal of the current net neutrality guidelines is a good thing for businesses and the customers of the places, but only if new legislation gets passed so no ISPs can take advantage of there being no regulations in place in the

Show More
Related

  • The Pros And Cons Of Net Neutrality

    961 Words  | 4 Pages

    Net-neutrality is the principle that providers of Internet services enable access to all contents with no prejudice or discrimination against sites or products regardless of the source. In December, the U.S. government repealed the national regulations that prevented “Internet Service Providers from blocking legal content, throttling traffic or prioritizing content on their broadband networks” in favor of a “looser set of requirements that ISPs disclose any blocking or prioritization of their own content.” In summary, the government has decided to change net-neutrality and make it easier to profit from. The government’s want, and subsequent success, to change the strict guidelines by which net-neutrality operated with is supported by the Chairman

    Read More

  • Peter Gregory's Argument In Favor Of Net Neutrality

    1269 Words  | 6 Pages

    In the simplest of terms: the FCC rules mean no fast and slow lanes on the internet, no blocking of content, and no provider throttling your streaming video just because it can. (Hong) The only reason he could be against this is if he wanted to make money off of it. It is hard to fathom that someone would be against an internet where you are protected from getting exploited by the

    Read More

  • The Paramount Decision: The Supreme Court Case

    400 Words  | 2 Pages

    It changed the way movies were produced and distributed. Before this ruling, certain theaters would play certain movies. They would only play the movies that were made by the same company. This is basically making people go to a certain theater just to see a certain dilm that they want to see. This is now illegal.

    Read More

  • Dred Scott V. Sandford Case Study

    1004 Words  | 5 Pages

    It also restricted the rights that fugitive slaves had to a fair trial. Although I wasn 't a fugitive slave or a runaway, the court still ruled against me because ruling for me would mean they were interfering with Emerson’s rights to her property. My case ruling, along with the Compromise of 1850, basically crushed the idea of the Underground Railroad. Even if slaves got to a free state, if they were found, they 'd be given right back to their owners.

    Read More

  • Choose Life Case Study

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    ACLU filed a civil action challenging the act as facially unconstitutional. The district court held that the authorization of the “Choose Life” license plate was not purely government speech – it was mixed (private/government). 3. Issue: whether a government-crafted message disseminated by private volunteers creates a “forum” for speech that must be viewpoint neutral. 4.

    Read More

  • The Banning Of The Internet In Ayn Rand's Anthem

    594 Words  | 3 Pages

    With the world population being 7,259,902,243 people, a grossly huge amount of people use the Internet, the number being 3,366,261,156 people worldwide. That ends up being almost half of the population, the percentage being 46.4% I one hundred percent disagree with the “decision” of the government ridding of the Internet entirely, as if that isn't clear enough already. Though the government might find the termination of the Internet useful in some circumstances, I have no doubt that it may result in riots, violence, protests, and more in order to get it

    Read More

  • Analysis Of When Books Went To War By Molly Guptill Manning

    1726 Words  | 7 Pages

    Once Title V was approved, it led to limitations of Armed Service Editions, books sent to soldiers, and resulted in a great deal of controversial censorship. Through appeals to ethos, logos, and pathos, Manning promotes her conclusion that Title V should have been eliminated because it challenged freedom, a right that American

    Read More

  • The Neutrality Act 1930's Essay

    952 Words  | 4 Pages

    The neutrality act was created and put into law for the benefit of the public. The government tried to make the citizens believe it was thinking about their safety while manufacturing the law. Even though different parts of the law were passed at different times in the 1930’s I feel that it was made for the same reasons and, this reason was to keep the United States from going to war with foreign countries. Most of the citizens of the United States did not agree with the law. Franklin D. Roosevelt is the one who signed the neutrality act into law in the 1930’s.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Assignment

    1218 Words  | 5 Pages

    She uses an example of the Department of Education which do not allow students to abuse the loophole. She explains, “The Department of Education prohibit the use of pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreement by for-profit schools. “Therefore, it would apply the same for Federal Trade Commission, which should not allow the IoT’s company to use “pre-dispute mandatory arbitration agreement.” This gives her suggestion a strong support because it based on the regulation that already exist. By using comparison and contrast, the author promotes her

    Read More

  • President Taft's Failures

    844 Words  | 4 Pages

    Continuing on with Wilson, there were two key antitrust measures that Congress added. Clayton Antitrust Act comes as the first. In 1914, this act was made to strengthen the Sherman Antitrust Act of 1890. The new Clayton Act did not allow corporation to gain stock to create a monopoly. If a company was to violate the law, its officers were able to be prosecuted.

    Read More

  • The Effects Of The Sherman Anti-Trust Act

    1539 Words  | 7 Pages

    The main laws passed were the Clayton Anti-Trust Act, the Robinson-Patman Act of 1936, Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950, and the establishment of Federal Trade Commission. The purpose of the Clayton Anti-Trust Act was to strengthen the wording of the law. According to info (www.linfo.com), “The Robinson-Patman Act of 1936 strengthened the Clayton Act by prohibiting large sellers from offering different prices to different buyers if it resulted in harm to even a single small firm,” while the purpose of the Celler-Kefauver Act of 1950 was to further strengthen the Clayton Act by preventing a firm from merging with a competitor by

    Read More

  • Teapot Dome Scandal Analysis

    754 Words  | 4 Pages

    Like a monopoly, their greed made their illegal sales into a death race. I think that the passage of the Volstead Act and the ruling in the Scopes trial did represent genuine triumphs for traditional values. During the Scopes trial people were fighting for their religious beliefs because a biology teacher tried to teach his student the theory of evolution. Since the theory of evolution was completely against their traditional values, the process of the Scopes trial was justifiable.

    Read More

  • Problem Of Monopolies And Trusts In The Progressive Era

    439 Words  | 2 Pages

    Other legislation passed after this just backed up the Sherman Anti-Trust Act. The Hepburn Act gave the Interstate Commerce Commission power to keep railroad rates from going too high. The Mann-Elkins Act kept the phone and telegraph rates

    Read More

  • The Internet: The Positive Impacts Of The Internet In The World

    1589 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Internet includes commercial, educational, governmental, and other networks, all of which use the same set of communications protocols.” The Internet has rapidly taken over, not only the United States, but also in numerous other countries across the ocean. “There was an estimate of 3.5 billion

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Internet Censorship

    757 Words  | 4 Pages

    A bit of both? Well, it’s not your fault because that’s exactly what half the world’s human population is coping with right now. For starters, Censorship is that omnipresent power which restricts contents on a webpage for being harmful, objectionable, obscene, ethnically provoking or unlawful by keeping a track of your account activity, your posts, your comments, uploads and pictures. Censorship works on many levels.

    Read More

More about The Importance Of Internet Rules And Regulations

Open Document