The very ‘title’ of the play is a deliberate construction on the part of the playwright. To explain his usage of it, Ionesco states, “When people no longer share your opinions. When you can no longer make yourself understood by them, one has the impression of being confronted with monsters- rhinos for example… and history has shown us during the last quarter of the century that people thus transformed not only resemble rhinos, but really rhinoceroses.” The collective consciousness of the people is depicted in the very first encounter with the rhinoceros in the play; when “…a noise is heard, far off but swiftly approaching, of a beast panting in its headlong course and of a long trumpeting.” The incapacity of individual responses is reflected in the verbatim reactions of the Waitress, the Grocer and Jean who state “Oh, a rhinoceros!” Through …show more content…
We need to decipher what the rhinoceros meant to us. For Ionesco, “the police are rhinoceroses. The judges are rhinoceroses…revolutions are doings of rhinoceroses.” Berenger questions his understanding of the rhinoceroses by asking “are they practice or are they theory?” also he believes that the rhinoceroses are anarchic because they are in the minority. Accordingly, every inhuman regime numerically is minority prospered by the silence of the majority sense of solidarity ironically becomes a ploy as people want to be rhinoceroses, as statistics have changed and the substructures tilt towards the transfiguration. This also leads us to the question of “goodness”, the moment one sees good in evil, one is interpolated into the dominant ideology. This is located in Berenger’s perpetual anxiety to remain human and his ability to act in an unselfish way by helping Jean in his moment of crisis. The larger question that they play asks is what have we evolved into from our primeval stage of
It is about people who are bonded to each other, each of whom is a mixture of good and bad,darkness and light, love and hate.” (Vanier) http://www.picturequotes.com/jean-vanier-quotes Jean vanier’s whole-heartedness creates the image of a
Ehrenreich brings up the idea that war is human kinds natural high. She sails us down a road of self-doubt in humanity and makes society re-question the idea of antiwar acts all the
Every person has something to contribute to society, regardless of age, sex or culture. The measurement of a person’s worth is determined by more than simply following rules and going through the motions. Accordingly, the combined contribution to society is more than the sum of each person. However, in The Chrysalids, by John Wyndham, the people of Waknuk live a life governed by strict social norms, which limits their expression of individuality. This pervasive attitude results in a narrow-minded perspective on what it means to be human.
Paper Four “To be superfluous means not to belong to the world at all” – (pp 475) Arendt views large, superfluous masses of people as a necessary precursor for the transition from a totalitarian movement to a totalitarian rule. These masses, formed from the atomization of the class system in a society, serve several purposes which allow for successful totalitarian rule: they help to act as the popular lever by which a totalitarian movement may secure power, they carry out the rote functions of the totalitarian rule, and most critically, they are killed or imprisoned in droves as a means of demonstrating and employing the power of the totalitarian system. This final purpose, the continual destruction of random portions of the atomized masses,
By creating characters in the novel who are excluded and labelled the author demonstrates how cruel society can be to people. The purpose of this essay is to show how the author reveals the experiences of marginalised characters in society. Joseph Davidson is an introverted, fourteen year old boy who feels that he is trapped within his own world of chaos, and he too is a marginalised character in the book. It is suggested by the author that other characters believe that Joseph’s mother smothers him too much and his father has
This transformation of Equality 7-2521 illustrates the role, nature, and independence of man which Ayn Rand tries to implement in this book. Equality 7-2521 has grown up knowing only The Society which he has held onto steadfast his entire life. When Equality 7-2521 is in what they call Small School, (school) the Whole has to recite the phrase, “’Mankind is all”’ (Rand 21).
Sartwell focuses on the evil of genocide and his own humanity as evidence to corroborate his claims. Szegedy-Maszak on the contrary focuses on research performed by psychologists to corroborate her claim. Sartwell’s evidence consists of traits that he and people who are inherently evil share, such as: having respect for authority, having a desire to find a place in society, categorizing others based on their traits, and making compromises to protect the ones they love (118). All of these traits are qualities all humans possess, Sartwell blatantly accepts these traits along with his humanity claiming “I am not profoundly different than these people, and if you think you are, then you are either a moral hero or you are profoundly self- deluded” (118). This cynical approach in his article causes one to reevaluate their mindset; knowing that nobody is morally perfect makes us as people accept the humanity we all possess.
He shows how man can destroy, as in war, and that man must remove hate in order to achieve a “separate peace.” Finny sacrifices himself so Gene doesn’t end up like Leper, the outcast of society. Leper, a “naturalist,” represents the fragile, innocent people who hide from the horrors of life until one day they “meet it, the horrors face to face, just as (they) had always feared, and so give up the struggle completely” (196). Leper comes to one realization; people must evolve or perish. Gene, unlike Finny and Leper, can evolve.
By outwardly conforming to the Nazi’s expectations, Marie-Laure is able to save lives and soothe her conscience in doing what is right. Marie-Laure is motivated to act upon her inner questioning conscience and finds the strength to aid the resistance while appearing submissive to the
He disagrees with the society’s way of living and is arrested for it, but he takes a step forward to change it. The author takes on different varieties of tone throughout the story such as gloominess, despair, and joy, which clarify the idea that he disagrees with this society’s
Secondly, as the play progresses, the use of animal symbolism illustrates the decline of Macbeth. In Act I, the Sergeant speaks of Macbeth and Banquo stating that they are: “As sparrows, eagles; or the hair, the lion” (I.ii.35) to their enemies. Specifically, the Sergeant refers to them as an eagle and a lion. Traditionally, these animals are inferred to be noble, strong, proud, and fierce. This shows how Macbeth is first known to have these traits.
William Shakespeare's King Lear is depressing and has no mercy, but it also encounters many more aspects which are quite important for everyone to know, such as: trails of deaths, battles, love, hatred, treacheries and most importantly nature and culture. Shakespeare created a play where the world was cruel and there was only plotting and tragedy with no shining light at the end of the tunnel. Shakespeare makes King Lear, a natural figure to show the hypocrisy. The connection between King Lear and Cordelia is an analogy for the relationship of nature and culture. It seems that King Lear believed in culture instead of nature, he could not understand his youngest, nicest and the most loving daughter Cordelia only because she had no words to
Cleaned of All Creativity The hands of each individual are stained with the creative colors that come from within their minds, used to express each one’s own individuality. In the books 1984 and Brave New World these rights are stripped away, not leaving anyone with even their own thoughts to cling to. The characters in these books are engulfed in societies that encourage unity and alikeness amongst everyone. They do not want anyone to have unique qualities at the risk of rebellion against the government.
Police deviance is something that isn’t particularly talked about in the open. The reactions to certain actions by the police are either kept under wraps or blown up in the media to a dramatic extent. The purpose of this paper is to focus on the negative side of police deviance and the repercussions that follow. This will allow some light to be shown on the actions of officers that don’t follow the rules that they set out to uphold. If the peacekeepers aren’t keeping the peace, then the reasoning for having a position of power is null.