According to John Krakauer in Into the Wild, he shows how McCandless and others have a unique perception of the wilderness because they have this awareness of free belonging to the wild. Their perspective has them in a reassurance of capturing their life in the wilderness, thinking about how it will change their whole perspective from daily struggles. In agreement with Leo Tolstoy in Into the Wild, “I wanted movement and not a calm course of existence. I wanted excitement and danger and the chance to sacrifice myself for my love. I felt in myself a superabundance of energy which found no outlet in our quiet life” (15). When Chris was in the wild he highlighted this passage in this one book. Krakauer included this quote in the book because …show more content…
The aspect of the wild for Chris was to reconnect with nature and himself as a human being. Krakauer expressed his opinion of what McCandless' view was and replied that “At long last he was unencumbered, emancipated from the stifling world of his parents and peers, a world of abstraction and security and material excess, a world he felt grievously cut off from the raw throb of existence” (22). Materialistic things and money was an aspect of Chris’s life with his parents. He escaped to the wilderness to have a sense of security and safety without many things holding him done. He needed to have a sense of what his life is away from his responsibilities, possessions. He envisioned a goal of backpacking throughout the wild to reach Alaska. He wanted to find his true happiness and beauty of discovering the undiscovered. People find this intriguing because they would ultimately have the same potential in finding who they are without others controlling them. A researcher from Canadian Geographic has studied and tested the mindfulness of his retreat into the wild admitting “My urge and opportunity, might use to reflect on their own lives and relation to nature and perhaps find there more spaciousness and meaning” (Kull). Bob Kull was able to capture a sense of the wilderness and capture moments of how he was able to envision his life in the open. McCandless showed that …show more content…
Having an ability to go the seek the meaning of life in nature, Krakauker admitting that “A man who has given away a small fortune, forsaken a loving family, abandoned his car, watch, and map, and burned the last of his money before traipsing off into the wilderness” (71). This shows how he didn’t need materialistic things, he only needed himself and nature to help him find that pursuit. While going off, Chris was called a leather tramp because he walked by foot. Written by Alexander Supertramp (alias), McCandless didn’t see the pleasure of being in the life that he had with his family. He didn’t seek anything from it which made him chase his goal of going to Alaska and finding himself while exploring the wilderness. People could see themselves as having this provoking aspect of the wilderness and how they would feel if they would drop everything and escape. Thinking about how others could find themselves feeling secure and safe outside of their regular comfort zone would feel unnatural to experience. Lewis & Clark Northwestern School of Law added “The cultural clashes surrounding wilderness have much to reveal about how we comprehend the world and our place in it. They reflect how we think about ourselves as distinct beings, our understanding of normative values and their origins and legitimacy, and how we
Krakauer writes about how when Chris had a job his boss described
Almost everyone can identify with the desire to travel entirely alone into the woods, away from the poisonous routine and materialism of daily life, and into an environment where your passion determines life or death. This was the reality for Christopher McCandless and Jon Krakauer.
In into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer, the concentration of the book, Christopher McCandless, shows confidence practically to the point of monomania and self-assimilation. It was not until he took off on his Alaskan Odyssey be that as it may, that those nearest to him understood the force of that freedom. Through cautious research and an individual association with McCandless, Jon Krakauer gives the peruser an inside take a gander at a young fellow who did not give many individuals a chance to close. To affirm his autonomy and turn out to be totally confident, McCandless took uncommon measures to reveal Reality. Many parallels can be drawn between Chris' beliefs and Emerson's paper, Confidence, in which he shows that individuals must look for isolation
Christopher McCandless went into the wild looking for something that is not clear, according to Jon Krakauer in his book “Into the Wild” (1996). The people he met along his journey and the actions he did, describe him as a hubristic, mentally disturbed, survivalist. But not all of this is true. Some people believe he went in the wilderness because he was tired of his parents who wanted him to be the same as them but he believed money was “shameful, corrupting, and inherently evil” (115). We have clear that one of his motivations was the love of literature, trying to follow some of the authors he idolized, London and Thoreau.
In Into the Wild, Chris McCandless serves as an example of what rediscovering the frontier can give us as he undertakes both a symbolic and physical frontier. He is proof of the adventurous spirit buried deep within every American, that draws them into the frontier, and into the wild. Taking the first step into the unknown is the most taxing step of the journey, which is why Jon Krakauer frequently returns to the end of Chris’s college experience, which is when he begins the first steps toward the frontier. Chris sees hope in an endlessly changing life. He sees adventure and new experiences where others might see danger and peril.
To conclude, Krakauer uses three valuable techniques to capture the meaning behind Into the Wild and McCandless’s journey itself: narrative structure, epigraphs, and tone. Chris McCandless was an intelligent young man who sought adventure far from his dull stable life. He essentially went off the grid to capture what he wished for the most, which was ultimate freedom and happiness. It was like a tag on a shirt that keeps bothering the tenderness of one’s skin. It was the reason why the tag was ripped off.
Overall, Chris McCandless is a reckless and ill-prepared explorer because he made careless decisions, lacked personal closeness and connection with those he knew, and could not accept criticism. Chris McCandless was a callow adventurer who decided to walk into the wilderness of Alaska and make careless decisions. Just before Chris left his home to embark on a cross-country adventure, he made a questionable decision with all his money. The novel Into the Wild, by Jon Krakauer, quoted that “He would shortly donate all his money [$24,000] to OXFAM America, a charity dedicated to fighting hunger” (20). Chris opted to leave all the money behind in hopes of starting his journey on his own.
Into The Wild A few people of the society may think that Christopher McCandless was insane for his actions and the consequences never came to his mind. I believe that Christopher McCandless traveled into the Alaskan wilderness for a variety of reasons, but the evidence shows two main ones. Although McCandless was able to survive for just about 4 months in the Alaskan wilderness, it is only acceptable to claim that his philosophical beliefs and his bad rebellion of youth and risk-taking tendencies was the cause of his departure. McCandless was was known for showing the signs of being a Transcendentalist at his last days. Connecting your spirit to nature is something that Transcendentalist believe in doing.
When we think of going out into the wilderness to explore all its wonders, most of us would be petrified by the thought. However, for Chris McCandless and many others, the thought alone excited them. In the nonfiction novel, Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, Krakauer introduces to us the story of Chris McCandless and his journey through the Alaskan wilderness. In the novel, Krakauer tries to convey understanding between the reader and McCandles. Krakauer’s use of rhetorical devices such as diction and parallelism helps to defend Chris’s actions and explain the importance of his journey.
Krakauer then uses this to his advantage in order to portray just how joyous an individual can feel when immersed in the expansive
Many individuals throughout society frequently find themselves on a quest to learn who they really are. While there are several ways to discover one's own meaning, spending time alone is the most typical and effective method. Christopher John McCandless, the main character in Jon Krakauer's novel Into the Wild, is a man who abandons civilization in order to explore Alaska's wilderness. Chris decides to journey into the bush after coming to the realizaiton that the only way to discover his actual identity is by blazing his own trail and leaving behind all the amenities of modern life. The study of Chris’ life and death by Krakauer discusses the significance of identity and the ways in which it is influenced by social interactions and the environment.
But I came to appreciate that mountains make poor receptacles for dreams.” (pg. 182). Similar to Krakauer, McCandless was always reaching for the goal, unknowingly having already found his refuge in the thrill of the journey. Although McCandless' first intentions were to explore the Alaskan wilderness in total isolation and to find the refuge he sought after in such circumstances, McCandless unknowingly established refuge in the course of his travels. It most likely did not cross McCandless’ mind,
“Into The Wild” by Jon Krakauer is the story of Chris McCandless’s life and journey. In 1992, this young man, Chris, from an average family in the East Coast decided to cut off contact with his family and give up all his possessions so that he could hitchhike into the Alaskan bush. A main reason many believe Chris went into the wilderness was because he was in search of his identity. From reading this book I have come up with my own opinion of what type of person he was. The conclusion I have reached about Chris is that he was a distant and ill-prepared person who had a very strong will.
The adventure of the wilderness is something that is occurring throughout very many different wishes. He just wanted to live the dream he wanted to pursue in the adventure of catching prey and surviving in the wilderness on its own. Applies to McCandless journey in a few ways of his childhood. He then realized how all the factors in different reasoning in the entire prompt and wilderness.
When McCandless graduated from college, he found the possibility to go away for a while, “He had fled the claustrophobic confines of his family” (Krakauer 55). McCandless could finally go away looking for a journey full of adventures, but he wasn’t going to five stars hotels or luxurious places. His journey was precarious and wild, that was exactly what he was looking for. Places that were difficult for someone to reach and loneliness was abundant, the only interaction was with nature and savage animals. Happiness engulfed McCandless when backpacking anywhere, it was his joy.