Introduction to Nationalism

Moses Mendelssohn accomplished quite a lot in his lifetime which is what we will be analyzing in this essay. Moses Mendelssohn was a German and Jewish philosopher although many say that he wasn’t the best philosopher. Best he was also a critic, Bible translator, and commentator who greatly contributed to Jewish renaissance and was also the most important figure in early modern Jewish history for that matter. Firstly, we will demonstrate his best accomplishments during his time which lead to him being an important figure in Early Modern Jewish History.

In fact, many famous debates were triggered that "condemned Lincoln 's position as the equivalent of hostility to the Constitution itself" (Paulsen 3). Though the Constitution had nothing against slavery, Lincoln stood firm and worked to end slavery, while other politicians disagreed. In addition, Lincoln also struggled with serious depressive episodes. Depression was in Lincoln 's family history. He had many losses of people that were close to him, such as his mother, siblings, and friend (Carson and Wakely 2).

Patriotic nationalism, on the other hand, means that societies must have a yearning to protect their land, patriotic nationalism. If not, other enemy lands that do have a sense of nationalism will conquer. When citizens of a country have a love for what their nation stands for and its people, their homeland thrives. People work harder and more efficiently when they feel pride towards a common goal. This is exactly something positive that Orwell doesn’t touch up on in his

Madison’s essay reflects the fear many had of a tyrannical government and the desire to ensure that the country didn’t revert back to that which it had just escaped from. He notes the necessity to prevent any one faction or group from gaining too much power and oppressing those in the minority. The separation of powers was set in place to ensure that this could not happen. Even if one group decides they want something, the other two have the equal authority to prevent it should it not represent the country as a whole.

A.S.M Anwarullah Bhuiyan in “A Critical Response to Will Kymlicka’s View of Multiculturalism” mentions that national minorities deserve fair treatment by the state, but the Indigenous have lost their societal culture due to an unjust societal system. As a result of the critiques findings, a culture is not a synonym with a nation. It is difficult to identify unique cultures and to determine if each unique culture should receive special rights. In Canada, the Aboriginals have unique rights but the smaller groups identify they have unique cultural characteristics the harder it is to give rights to the defined

The deficiency of laws and authority channels arguments and disputes where the international arena turns to a self-help system. When this situation happens, each state is accountable for its own survival as well as determines its interests and chase power. As Thucydides mentioned it “the independent states survive only when they are powerful”. (Thucydides, 1972). Since realists look at the states as anarchic, they believe security is a main issue.

For that reason, an essential characteristic of democracy must be the people 's right to change the majority through elections. This right is the people 's "supreme authority." Therefore, the minority must have the right to strive for becoming the majority and retain all the rights required to compete fairly in elections, speech, assembly, association, because otherwise the majority would turn out to be everlasting and develop into a dictatorship. Therefore, the majority in lieu and time, ensuring the minority the right to seek to become a majority is paramount.

To hold this type of power, a nation must be united under a set of beliefs important to its people. America, created to represent a place of freedom

On the one hand I realize that the state is needed to provide support in many ways within a community, but the state siding with a majority culture can alienate those that are not a part of it, whether or not it is by choice. There needs to be a larger state-culture that is open and supportive of all sub-cultures of those who live in a society. This state-culture must place value on things that promote flourishing and autonomy, whilst embracing the differences between people and groups. There should be equal access to all sub-cultures, with no single culture showing primacy over others. Culture plays a huge role in defining how we identify, so we need to be careful when dealing with a structure that has the potential to influence so many

This is because of three main reasons: government controlling agenda, there are outside groups, whom have no influence and there is inequality amongst groups in the political system. If pluralism truly existed all groups would be equal as well as having an equal opportunity to be an insider group and therefore addressing the last two arguments. The most important argument against the utility of pluralism is government controlling the agenda. This is because groups can’t affect policy if it is not on the governments agenda. This is usually because of manifesto promises or ideology, and if these groups whose aims aren’t shared by government they will be outsiders.

Theodor meant that the Jewish population around the world had the required ingredients to institute a new and efficient nation. Herzl and several other Zionist leaders believed that this issue

For the question which characteristics are most important to countries during times of conflict, it would probably have to be a charismatic leader and patriotism. A charismatic leader is going to end up having strong ultra nationalistic views and ideas, eventually putting those ideas and views into action. If there end up being conflict in the country that leader is going to do what they can to help their country even if what happens ends up being ultra nationalistic because it most likely will. Leaders like that usually keep ultra nationalism going. Patriotism is also a method that maintains ultra nationalist views.

It should be a nation a people that share similar and common culture and history.when a independence government forms in a nation it is called nation-state. That nation-state has to defend the nations way of life and territory. And one of its biggest roles is to represent the whole nation to the rest of the world. The general population

While those who argue in favor of assimilation possibly argue from a position of National preservation, those who argue against it potentially argue from the perspective of immigrant preservation. However, in his essay “Assimilation & the persistence of culture”, James Bennett suggests that anti-assimilation sentiments can also originate from a place of Nationalism in that, “By global standards, the culture and social systems of the English-speaking nations are some of the most individualistic. Interactions with other cultures therefore inherently involve a challenge to those features of our culture and a challenge by our culture to the less individualistic, less free features of theirs” (Bennett). Further anti-assimilation arguments claim

Yes, for the reason that, they are an element of our society, hence vital for this country. Citizens of the United States of America are split on this particular argument, however, different studies have shown