Michael Shultz has been charged with involuntary manslaughter with concerns to shooting his cousin Jeremy Hatfield. The New Mexico juvenile court system has charged him with involuntary manslaughter under their definition that he displayed a reckless regard for safety and irresponsibility (Peters, 2013). The author does not believe that Schultz should even be charged and that adult parties should be charged for him having obtained access to a handgun. Additionally, the concerns by the author of Schultz age and mental capabilities as that of a teenager are factors that he believes are such that the involuntary manslaughter charge should not be rendered against Schultz. During class the issues of the developing brain of a teenager shows that …show more content…
He does provide compelling information concerning the teenage brain development but is not an expert in the field nor does he relate the source of his information. The wording of this piece demonstrates the perspective of Michael Schultz being just a kid and is aimed at getting people to react on his defense due to his age. Peters does remark that Schultz is not completely blameless which tends to evoke that leniency should be given and that the police are wrong to charge him (2013). From a political vantage his wording about a stupid lie is used to emotionally generate with people that it is unfair and that the lie is what caused police to charge Schultz. Peters goes on to say that Schultz should have known better but due to his developing brain that he did not and that it was his impulsivity that led him to point a gun at his cousin (2013). This is a further example of wording to elicit emotionality from the reader that Schultz is being unfairly tried. Peters also talks about how children are not known to have the ability to consciously be aware of the consequences their actions could bring (2013). The author making a point about children is in a way comparing the fifteen-year-old Schultz to a child mentality to further elicit support for his opinion. Therefore, given the wording and the fact that the author is not an expert in any field this piece is based on the authors opinion on what should and should not happen to
Case: South Carolina v. Christopher Frank Pittman (Findlaw, 2008) Facts: That Pittman, shot and morality wounded both his grandparents, Joe Frank and Joy Pittman, with a .410 shotgun. Appellant was 12 years old at time of alleged incident, he was abandoned by his mother, and his relationship with his father was abusive. Prior to moving in with grandparents, appellant had been committed to an inpatient facility, where he was on the antidepressant Paxil, soon he was released and permitted to live with grandparents (Findlaw, 2008). .
In the April of 2007, Brendan Dassey of Manitowoc County, Wisconsin was tried for the assistance and/or direct involvement in the rape and murder of Teresa Halbach, a 25 year-old photographer. However, he was only sixteen years of age, whereas he was tried as an adult, as eighteen or older. Is it moral to put a minor’s liberty on the line as if they were a full-grown, mature adult? This essay will elaborate why Dassey was not at the level of maturity to face the consequences of an adult criminal. First and foremost, Dassey was, as mentioned above, a sixteen year-old, meaning that he is still a child, a minor by U.S. law.
The boy just celebrated his third birthday in March. Asked what was the most exciting thing that happened in his 43-year career, Brian replied that he was the third officer to arrive at the scene of the shooting death of David Schultz by John DuPont in 1996. The ensuing 48-hour standoff was an unforgettable weekend. That incident went national almost immediately and Brian’s sister was watching television in Connecticut. She was shocked to see her brother being interviewed at the scene of the
On October 18th, a teen in Meridian, Idaho shot and killed a 15-year-old, but police say the the shooting was an accident. 18-year-old David Provencio was smoking marijuana and consuming alchohol with many others in a home close to East Franklin Road. Provencio said that he pointed the gun and shot the victim, not knowing that the gun was loaded. And the kid who was shot was pronounced dead at the hospital. When the authorities arrived at the scene they were told that the kid shot himself while there were several children and a few adults there at the time of the shooting.
1. Leesa Meldrum was not entitled of IVF treatment which was stated under the Sex Discrimination Act. 1984 2. Single and lesbian women had no right of accessing IVF treatment; they couldn’t access IVF treatment unless they were married woman who couldn’t conceive naturally. 3.
In the article Startling Finds on Teenagers Brains it states that “In terms of cognitive development, as research on the human brain has shown, Brazill and any other young teen is far from childhood” People at the age of twelve do not have the mentality of an adult, no child knows better than what they see or hear. For example, things that they see would be video games. Video games do have an influence on many young children because they
There are many victims of unfortunate circumstances in the world today, yet some of these results could have been easily avoided. In the novel, Just Mercy, the author Bryan Stevenson addresses many cases in which children under the age of 18 are incarcerated within the adult criminal justice system. By treating children as adults in the criminal justice system their innocence and undeveloped person, become criminalized. These children become dehumanized and only viewed as full-fledged criminals and as a result society offers no chance sympathy towards them. Stevenson argues that children tried as adults have become damaged and traumatized by this system of injustice.
This is shown to be especially true when a child is misunderstood of why they have done something wrong. Many children are unaware of the harm they are doing to an individual because they are incapable of understanding why their action is a bad thing. Susan Perabo is able to show this to be true in her short story, “The Payoff” when she informs the reader of Anne and Louise’s situation with the principal. These characters’ analyses show how unwise and immature a young child is in their youth from even the simplest actions. The story’s evaluation led to a direct result in understanding the writing and the theme of the story.
For example, Nathaniel Brazill was 13 years old when he was guilty of shooting a middle school and charged with second degree murder. He says that he made a “stupid mistake” but was convicted of second degree murder not first. In the article, “Startling Finds on Teenage Brains” it says that, “a child is not a man.” Meaning that a child shouldn 't be getting treated as an adult no they
Discussion on a case [Student’s Name] [Name of the Institution] Discussion on a case Brief overview of the case The case surrounds Pat who was involved in the death of two people as a result of his reckless actions; his girlfriend Sara and of her friend Lauren. The event started with Pat being asked by Sara to take her cat to the vet for an injection.
Not only does Berstein call for an overall reform of this nation’s juvenile prisons, she goes as far as saying the practice of locking up youth is in need of a “more profound than incremental and partial reform” (13). The fact that Bernstein outlines the numerous failed strategies and goals of this practice with her compelling use of studies and statistics is enough to promote an audience to reject the practice of locking up youth. The statistic she shares that “four out of five juvenile parolees [will be] back behind bars within three years of release” as well as the studies she conducted on numerous instances when a guards abuse of power lead to the death of a child work to further prove her point: being that “institution[s] as intrinsically destructive as the juvenile prison” have no place in a modern society (13, 83). Bernstein refutes this false sense effectiveness further by sharing her own ideas on what she believes works as a much more humane solution to rehabilitating
This article has great viewpoints, use of argumentative reasoning, and shows what truly happens in the hallways of a school shooting. The main person he explains is Eric Harris, who killed over two-thousand students and faculty in a Colorado high school in 1998. He set off bombs all over the school and used a semi-automatic
Innocent people who are incriminated under improper evidence are hanged. Parallel in the McMartin day care abuse case, the McMartin family, who administrate the establishment, and other members are accused illegally of having abused sexually numerously of the children under their vigilance. The accusations used against the McMartin
Therefore, when a person argues that a juvenile was not aware of their crime is a discrediting claim. In 1990 in the city of Chicago, a couple expecting their first child were murdered in cold blood in the hands of a juvenile teen. The teen shot both the husband and the wife who pleaded for their lives and the life of their unborn child. Author of “Juvenile Justice Information Exchange”, Jennifer Jenkins states, “He reported to a friend, who testified at his trial, about his ‘thrill kill’ that he just wanted to ‘see what it would feel like to shoot someone’”. This killer was aware of his crime and was aware of who his victims were due to planning the murders months before.
Should children be taught gun safety? An instructor at an Arizona shooting range was teaching a nine year old how to shoot a fully automatic uzi and the kid lost control of the gun and accidently shot the instructor. Gun accidents like this shouldn’t happen. First, a nine year old kid should not start learning how to shoot a gun of that caliber. Once the trigger is pulled with that type of gun, the gun shoots a lot of rounds a second and it is hard to control.