Everyone has their own opinions on different topics. Some arguments may be more clear than others, but they exist. Some debates on arguments should end, but people always find a way to argue the other side. For example the argument on student debt has been going for a long time. To many, student debt should be eliminated, which makes sense in order to improve our economy. Kayla Webley argues something different in her piece “Is Forgiving Student Loan Debt a Good Idea?”. When reading Webley’s piece she made me rethink my opinion behind student debt. By using her knowledge, logos, and pathos she was able to write a compelling piece. In a debate there is always an audience to watch. This also holds true to writers trying to get their message …show more content…
Webley to fight her side adds a lot of data in her piece. She introduce Robert Applebaum, the author of a piece she writing against, to take his argument apart. She states “Feeling shackled by an estimates $88,000 in student loan debt, Robert Applebaum started the petition in 2009…(Webley 130).” She does this to show her audience why Applebaum wants to eliminate student debt. Like I wrote above she comment that all student debt would equal about one trillion dollars. She starts to put doubt in people's minds about eliminating student debt. She wants people to know that the economy would be put in the bad situation. She then adds a part of Justin Wolfers’ blog to continue arguing her point on how much it would cost us. As Wolfers started on Freakonomics blog, “Someone who has $50,000 in debt forgiven is not likely to pump all those dollars back into the economy in a short amount of time. (Webley 130)” Her point is that if a student is struggling with debt they are not well off. So the burden would fall the taxpayers. Then she goes on to debunk the myth we hear and see on television or the internet. She states “As it turns out, the six-figure debts that we keep hearing about in the media are actually pretty unusual. (Webley 130)” She wants her reader to know that student debt is not as big as the media says. Webley says that less than one percent end up with a six figure digit. All this data shows that Webley has a
Evaluating this article, it is very informative and helpful in helping one who is in debt to individually find a solution. This article, although not focused on the entirety of this social problem, demonstrates a perspective of solution for an individual. Comparing this article with the others, it relates to the article shown above, however; focuses more on how the individual can help their debt rather than how to solve the student debt crisis all throughout
Public discourse is the interaction between people in the world. Deborah Tannen describes public discourse when she wrote You Just Don’t Understand and how the television and radio station was extremely fair. However, she describes later on after about a year people started criticizing her work. She began to realize when she asked a reporter why do you need to make others wrong for you to be right and her response was because it’s an argument. We don’t listen and understand when someone else is talking because we are just trying to respond.
Throughout the course of history there has been a few basic pioneer traits which have become habitual and a way for humans to express themselves. One of the main and core habits which is an important way of expressing ourselves is through communication. Furthermore, as one becomes more precise about communication, they soon realize that they might not have the same views on certain topics. Hence, this leads to argumentation, which is the process of supporting an idea or simply a means for one to express and communicate themselves. Typically, an argument does not consist of name calling, and as a matter of fact disapproves ideas without evidence.
In her essay, Is Forgiving Student Loan Debt a Good Idea?, Kayla Webley, an education correspondent for Time magazine argues the thought of reducing the debt from student loans. Webley, for the most part is successful in arguing her claim, through her use of Ethos, Logos, and Pathos. Webley, effectively pushes her argument through her strong use of Logos, and Ethos, however, lacks in her ability to fully connect emotionally through Pathos. The author starts off her argumentative essay by summarizing recent issues and events surrounding the topic of her debate, to connect logically and bring her audience to a level of similar understanding about the matter.
Who is the greatest quarterback of all time; this is a current debate in the media after Tom Brady’s fifth Super Bowl win. The Inquirer and The Denver Post are two newspapers in the media that are apprising people of the facts on Tom Brady. When evaluating articles in The Inquirer and The Denver Post about NFL quarterback Tom Brady’s legacy, one can identify the differences and similarities in the articles, such as points of view, what the articles mainly about, and conclusions made by the writer. First off, both articles have different points of view which one can compare and contrast to determine the credibility of the facts based on the tone of the writing. Both articles debate the facts about how Brady could be the best NFL quarterback,
Despite how much you may dislike it or try to avoid it, arguing is a natural part of life. Most people would not think that arguing is a natural way of balancing things out, but it is. Although there isn’t necessarily a right way to argue, there are definitely wrong ways to argue, which will most likely lead to bigger problems than the original problem. Clearly, no one taught us how to argue, but just like we are influenced to do a lot of things in life, the way we disagree with one another and accept criticism is one. In today’s society, technology has played a major role in influencing the way we argue and disagree with one another.
According to the last recording of student loan debt, the total amount of the United States student loan debt is roughly one and a half trillion dollars (A look at…). Statistics like these present the urgent need to resolve the major financial issue of student loan debt. Solutions have been given by many people to solve this issue but most solutions fail. The main reason behind student loan debt is falling to far into debt to the point where it is almost impossible to come back. The origin behind all of this is a lack of a student loan amount cap.
Loans can quickly turn into a substantial amount of debt by the time a student completes their standard 4 year degree. As a result, this debt can carry on throughout their adult life and make starting that life more difficult. “A record share of students are leaving college with a
Journalist Sophie Quinton discusses how college expenses are constantly rising, though many states are now reducing instate tuition in her recent article, “States Move to Curb Rising College Tuition. Quinton informs readers that colleges are not only cutting college tuition, but freezing it. As a result student loans are soaring nationally, and schools are forced to become more efficient. Student loans are then causing debt, that later affects a students’ life in numerous ways. College students today, tend to lean towards nicer looking colleges, rather than a higher education.
In chapter 1 Jay Heinrichs, the author of the book, to uses examples from his family life to help introduce the central theme. He starts with an example of arguing with his son about toothpaste, Heinrichs’s argument with George reaches a clear resolution unlike some of the other examples given in the text. Heinrichs does this to show readers a way to argue while showing intelligence. Having established the importance of controversy and rhetoric in an everyday setting, Heinrichs states that rhetoric is an “unavoidable a part of life”. This is where he introduces the central idea of the book which is that rhetoric is necessary and unavoidable part of life he goes on to state that
The tuition and cost of college is detrimental to thousands of families across the country and brings student debt to future graduates. Some students have seen their debt climb over $30,000. Friedman writes, “The average student in the Class of 2016 has $37,172 in student loan debt…” (Friedman). With the debts being over the average income for single people households, college has transformed from a benefit to a burden. Young adults not only have to worry about their education but also paying for the next semester or years of college ahead of them.
Loans allow receiving a college education seem like a smoother process considering that such a hefty amount to pay is divided so that it can be paid for in moderation. Despite the fact that it’s split into many payments, it’s still a large quantity all in all so unless indebted students aim for high income jobs, there would many years of difficulty to come after college. For this reason, undergraduates make it their goal to go after jobs which would prevent them from being constantly pressured to pay off debt. Thus, student debt is both a crisis and a reason to encourage persistence towards greater ambitions (Hillman, 41). It is a tremendous thing when a student seeks to be financially comfortable or even rich in the future but not when it is for the wrong reasons.
Student loans can be helpful, but when it's time to pay back, it can lead to future mental struggles and be stressful and hold you back from living the life you want to live in the long run. The student loan debt crisis in now only taking a huge toll on the personal lives of many Americans, but on the economy as well. Whether or not students graduate or not, if they pulled out student loans worth $200,000 they remain in debt for a remainder of years. As the problem continues to grow it becomes more and more critical to find a solution to help the well being of everyone in the nation, student or
They Say/I Say “Template” They Say/I Say: The Moves That Matter in Academic Writing, presents the reader with a multitude of writing “templates” that are designed to help foster, not only one’s basic writing ability, but also their creativity. Authors Gerald Graff and Cathy Birkenstein even go as far as to argue that writing in this format, and later conversing in this manner, can “get us thinking critically about our own beliefs.” Specifically the template “They Say/I Say” is the most important for a young writer to master, since they believe that strong, academic writing involves, not only the writer’s opinions, but also the stances of others. In their view, “the best academic writing has one underlying feature: it is deeply engaged in some way with other people’s views.”
Debates and arguments appear useless without a strong sense of rhetoric tied within. Rhetorical devices are used in persuasive writing or speech in order to make the point clearer, as well as stronger. When considering the controversial topic of whether tattoos and piercings are appropriate in the workplace, the argument could not stand alone without substantial techniques applied. Two opposing sides, “10 Wrong Reasons Tattoos and Piercings in the Workplace are Covered” from Stapaw.com and “Should Tattoos be Allowed in the Workplace?” from Salary.com, shows how debaters approach many different styles to build a proper argument. After analyzing the rhetorical devices of the two different perspectives regarding the issue of tattoos and piercings