In the article, “Is Global Warming the Greatest Threat to National Security?” author William Jasper addresses one of the most controversial topics, global warming and how it is believed to negatively impact a nation's national security. Seemingly, global warming is not just a matter of climate change, but also a matter of a national stability. The article commences by quoting important political figures such as Bernie Sanders, Hillary Clinton, and even President Obama, all which seem to agree that AGW(anthropogenic global warming) is the root of most “terrorism, instability, inequality, and disease” nationwide. Then it proceeds to talk about how global warming could be negatively affecting countries such as Syria due to its terrorism. The article uses important political figures and even presents valuable scientific data of droughts and other natural disasters to support claims, but quickly turns away to discuss how global warming has no real influence, instead scientific data demonstrates that global cooling has had more …show more content…
The way the author has set up his article suggests it is a problem and solution, he begins by quoting presidential candidates as well as the president, whom clearly state their viewpoints, then uses scientific articles to go along with their claims. Even when the author shifts from discussing the harmful effects of global warming to discussing the complete opposite, global cooling, he provides scientific data to further support his claim. For the most part the author uses a very formal tone, but towards the end of the article he transitions to a more casual and slightly aggressive tone. Judging by the author's tone and setup the article seemed informative while also trying to persuade the reader to agree with him. The author of this article presents his ideas in an orderly manner while also maintaining a relatable tone and a well defined
We are like boiling frogs, Failing to act against climate change. As the severity of the situation continues to increase the world is reaching catastrophic levels. The recent article, “It's not too late to stave off the climate crisis, U.N. report finds” by Lauren Sommer, uses persuasive language to alert the public that the time to act on climate change is now. The world has enough technology and solutions to fix this problem as stated in the article whilst the author uses pathos to help support the quote.
Global warming has been a growing issue to global security, with nations all around the world working to ease the soon possible negative effects. Throughout the world; many media outlets and sources online have covered and have formally addressed this topic. Each media and sources all holds bits of truths inside of them, however, all cannot be entirely unbiased. Most if not online sources covering this topic; list good reasons to battle climate change, due to this they all have their own manipulative techniques used to persuade the audience, favoring the liberal side CNN writes sources and has experts in specific fields to cover a topic relating to their political agenda, Nasa being a very pro-science uses logos to persuade the audience, CNS
Kevin Williamson writes in his essay “Apocalypse Soonish: The End Times Roll On” regarding the controversial discussion of climate change and humanity's’ love for apocalyptic drama. Williamson is an excellent writer who knows how to engage the reader with humor and wry comparisons as well as point out some obvious trends that show how dramatic some people can be regarding apocalyptic scenarios. However, his frequent disregard for the consequences of the warming's effects, inability to keep a concise argument and tone, and the recurrent misinterpretation of scientific findings, makes his paper difficult to take seriously. In “Apocalypse Soonish” Williamson compares previous hypotheses and estimations of the earth’s future to current studies
A few months ago, strange, frigid weather was sweeping across the nation. Some places saw their first snowfall in eight years. Other cities ended up being colder than cities that were closer to the North Pole. Scientists believe that this is because of global warming. Some people don’t believe that this weird weather means that global warming is a serious thing: “Some question how it could be so cold if the planet is heating up.
For the my articles or columns used, the shared topic was climate change and whether any actions will be taken accordingly. After reading and evaluating all the information, I have concluded that the article “Republicans Try a New Tack on Climate Change” (The New York Times) by Justin Gillis, presents a clear and well rounded argument that emphases on climate change, its effects on the environment and humanity as well as solutions to the issue. In the article, the writer presents most of their evidence in a logical and scientific way by having them be addressed by an expert: ‘“.. All those things have been ruled out,” said Drew Shindell, an atmospheric scientist at Duke University.” Unlike in the other articles, there is no expertise or claim
These articles help with building the picture that climate change is agreed upon everyone that it is an urgent and real thing is in of
When dealing with the facts of life, many people like to be lied to because they believe that it would lessen the hopeless feeling the news would bring. However, when dealing with issues such as global warming and pollution, the matter should be dealt with in the strictest and most truthful manner due to the severity of the issue. Many authors have published fictional books about events that may happen if humans do not change their ways, however, it heavily relies on the reader’s emotion to empathize with the main character and some events that occur is speculative. When it comes to non-fiction pieces about global warming, like in the article like “Coming Home,” by Roy Scranton, this article is rooted in statics and real life events and are
They also point out that global warming consensus is not based on science, but for the political purpose. From my perspective, the severity of climate change indeed can affect the decisions of policy-makers, such as green policy and governance. But it does not mean that people can just ignore the consequences of the enormous emission of greenhouse gases in the past few decades. First of all, countries in Latin America and Africa tend to concern more about climate change issue than other regions. I have noticed that the majority of climate change skeptics mentioned in the documentary were from U.S..
Almost anyone who will read this essay has undoubtedly heard of the climate phenomenon Global warming. Global warming is a topic that gets discussed very often nowadays, most notably during political debate and discussion. Politicians use certain stances on global warming to appeal to voter’s emotions and logic in order to gain votes and support for their campaign, however climate change is nothing new, during the past several hundred thousand years the Earth has heated up and cooled down and even experienced so called “ice ages”, which is a period where glacial deposits located at the northern and southern hemispheres have grown due to dramatic global cool downs. Don’t be confused by climate terminology though, the global warming so widely
There were also some misconceptions to the issue of global warming. In response to this, he presented the fact that there is really a global warming. According to the author “Scientists overwhelmingly agree that the Earth is getting warmer, that this trend is caused by people, and that if we continue to pump greenhouse gases into the atmosphere, the warming will be increasingly harmful.” The reason why the author really believes that global warming is very hazardous to the people health.
Today’s media can be described as many things; manipulative, condescending, misleading and much more. The point is not everyone agrees what with the media says. The media is never always right and never always wrong, this uncertainty in the media creates mixed opinions on topics especially if we are talking about climate change. Today, I am talking about An Inconvenient Truth and a New York Times Article, both sources are pushing people to see the effects of climate change and how we will be affected in the future. [>>] Davis Guggenheim’s An Inconvenient Truth, presented by former vice president Al Gore sets out to inform the world of climate change and the inevitable effects.
The following explains what climate change is and why it is a challenge to international stability. Next is an explication of the two most significant economic implications of global climate change for US national security. Climate Change is a broad term that describes various long term observable weather trends. These trends include temperature, precipitation amount, precipitation frequency, precipitation intensity, wind speed and direction. Climate change can reference various size locations and geographic types, such as an island, the Antarctic, an ocean, a continent, a hemisphere, or the entire earth.
Climate change otherwise known as global warming has been an ongoing issue for decades. Beginning in the 19th century, climate change has increasingly affected Earth and its atmosphere. Rising levels of carbon dioxide are warming the Earth’s atmosphere causing rising sea-levels, melting snow and ice, extreme fires and droughts, and intense rainfall and floods. Climate change has and will continue to affect food production, availability of water, and can add to many health risks in humans and animals. In fact, in an article by Justin Gillis titled, “Scientists Warn of Perilous Climate Shift Within Decades, Not Centuries” he focuses on a paper written by former NASA climate scientist, James E. Hansen, explaining the effects of climate change
For the 2015 Hancock Symposium, one of the sessions I attended was Climate Change and National Security by Dr. David Titley. In his talk, he outlined why climate change is becoming an increasing threat to our national security in the United States. Though we have known about climate change for decades, there has been little domestic nor international headway in trying to solve the intangible issue. Some countries have taken steps in combating climate change, but most of these countries are not western democratic. In contrast, democratic countries have bolstered little in their efforts in confronting climate change, some of which even pollute more today than they ever have.
Global warming has become a humongous issue for our world. Studies have shown that every year seems to get hotter, is that a coincidence? I think not. In this article scientists have found a way to help the world and global warming. Global warming is causing a great deal of stress to our planet.