Is Google Making USupid Analysis

Writers do their job because they want to express their ideas to make an impact on the readers. Sometimes they want to convince their audience through persuasion. They can do it using different rhetorical elements such as logos, ethos, and pathos. These are Greek words that mean logic, character, and emotion consecutively.

" Is Google Making Us Stupid" By Nicholas Carr refers to the ways technology is negatively affecting our brain function. Carr starts his argument talking about how the internet is a resource we can use for almost anything. As a result, we are becoming more and more dependent on it for simple everyday tasks. Carr states that technology is a distraction and just a "shortcut". According to the article, technology is becoming more important than people. This article should be read by anybody who spends a good part of their day using technology to make their life easier. Carr is easily persuasive in his argument with his middle diction and how well he relates to the average person.

We are at a time where technology is widespread; it has become a part of our everyday life leading to advantages and disadvantages. Technology nowadays has become the most important topic to discuss and everyone has developed their own unique opinion. In Nicholas Carr’s article published in 2008, “Is Google Making Us Stupid” he argues that as technology progresses people’s mentality changes. Carr is effective in his argument by sharing his fears and personal experiences to have an effect on the audience utilizing pathos and ethos. Not only does he include his own experience, but he also includes other people’s point of views. He goes on to support his claim of how technology

The internet could be the most valuable invention that was made in the modern age. With the force of the web individuals basically can do anything. From learning how to cook to building a car. The possibility is endless. The modernization of the internet can have positive and negative effects on the world. The modernization of the web can have positive and negative consequences on the world. It is sure in light of the fact that it gives everyone the power to access any information, that they need in second. In any case, it is contrary since individuals start to get limited focus and just focus on the things they need to see as opposed to seeing the full picture.

Nicholas Carr argues in his article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” that the internet is changing the way we think and work for the worst.Many people disagree with this argument, and I think the internet is changing us, for the better. The internet has become a great resource in terms of education. It has allowed for communicating across the world intercultural experiences that used to be impossible. Lastly the the younger generation has grown up with the internet and is better suited for using it.

Humanity is in the middle of a technology revolution and it’s not slowing down anytime soon. Now, more than ever, we communicate across the globe easily. The world is evolving and so are our minds. Nicholas Carr wrote an article for “The Atlantic” discussing the disadvantages of the internet in the modern day academic community. I agree with Carr saying that the internet is changing our minds but unlike Carr, I think our minds are changing for the better and the internet changing what it means to be smart.

Nicholas Carr’s “ Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, published July/August of 2008 states his opinion that Google is making us stupid. Carr states that we have become lazy and very reliant on the internet, which has changed our way of thinking and our ability to focus. He provides many facts and opinions of peers to back up his position on the topic.

Ai Weiwei is an extraordinary man that puts his life at risk every day for the people of China. He has been in jail on several occasions because of the way he expresses himself openly and as a result, is watched very closely by the Chinese Government. Ai Weiwei uses his artwork to show his viewpoint on issues in China such as human rights and freedom of expression. Not only does he use his artwork to show this, he also uses social media such as Twitter and Instagram to reach out to the public. Ai Weiwei uses the art that he creates and social media to share his ideas to the world, which ultimately is helping him in his fight with the Chinese Government. Ai Weiwei’s use of internet activism helps him inform millions of people in a way that has

In the Novel “The Shallows” by Nicholas Carr in my opinion he is over reacting also overthinking his main point of explaining the issues.

Nicholas Carr’s article on The Atlantic is an older informative article written to warn future generations of how easy it is abuse not only the availability of the internet but overuse it as well through his use of ethos, logos, and pathos. Carr begins his article with a scene from a well-known movie in 2001: A Space Odyssey, ending his paragraph with HAL (the computer) saying, “I can feel it. I can feel it.” He then begins his next paragraph with, “I can feel it, too.” This reiteration not only provides an effortless transition into his article, but it also provides us with a connection to people and computers. It goes to show that with todays technological advances, the line between human and computer has diminished a great amount.

Nicholas Carr's argument against the internet was very strong, and it persuaded me. It is very difficult for me to go against his opinion. I agree that the internet is changing us, but not in ways we think. There are long-term effects of using the internet as often as we do. He states that the internet is changing the way our brains function such as having a shorter attention span, negatively changing the way we critically think, and negatively changing our reading skills.

This statement is false. Activism over the internet is conducted by real, physical people and, just by that fact, effects the physical world by impacting the people who live within it. Online activism gives a chance for people who may not be in the traditional stream for politics to become increasingly involved with it by speaking to an increasingly growing audience. People who may have given up on the state of mainstream politics may find rekindled hope in online activism. For example, DeRay Mckesson – a civil rights activist who found his following through twitter, is running for mayor of Baltimore. Stating that “we cannot rely on traditional pathways to politics and the traditional politicians who walk that path” (Eligon), Mckesson displays how politics have evolved with technology and how the evolution of social media has allowed a new form of politicians, arising from the common people, to emerge. An additional example of online activism and politics causing a direct effect on mainstream politics can be found in a candidate for the United States presidency named Bernie Sanders. Sanders was originally given little notice by mainstream media (Whitacker), but as the internet spread information of his candidacy and built a support base around him, mainstream media had little choice but to give Sanders air-time. Although they do still hold

In the article, New Media and Social Memory, written by Richard Rinehart, the thesis is how new media art can be last for a long time. Also, he talks about the challenge of preserve the digital forms of new media art. He uses a lot of example not only to discuss the issue of social memory, but also to prove some of his arguments. The primary purpose of the work is to show the public what is social memory and how it works.

Stephen Fry talks about how the web generally upgrade and social media sites have become a well user generated content and billions of people have contributed to it with music, videos, and photos. Fry states that Social media websites have become a lifestyle for people due to its ease of access to connect with another person. Fry further states that this have become of everyday life and which it has become a revolving cycle to everyday life because technology never fully changes and history always repeats itself. Fry provides examples

We live in a society where people are becoming more and more dependent on and overwhelmed with technology. Every day something new, better and faster comes out. The rapid advancement of technological innovations has made it harder for people and their minds to catch up with what they are dealing with. With this, more and more people are becoming unable to face reality. Nicholas Carr’s essay, “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” is just another example of how rapid technological advancements are changing us without us even realizing. Carr claims that technology is becoming more than what we can handle and is affecting and changing the way we think. I, too, believe technology has become and will become even more an entity in which we will not be able to further control because of the impact these innovations have and will continue to have on us, society, and our ways of communication with others. Generally, the impact will be in a negative way. More people will become reliant on technology (e.g. social media), without noticing as more and more researchers and scientists try to come up with faster and even more efficient ways to “better,” in their opinion, the world.