Is Gun Control Necessary

806 Words4 Pages
Is Gun Control necessary? Would it make a big difference in today’s society? Well, many of America’s people have strong opinions on gun control and seem as if they are either completely against it, or completely for it. Gun control does not drastically influence the crime rates linked to guns. Gun Although advocates argue that gun control laws reduce the incidence of violent crimes by taking away firearms; Gun laws barely effect violence rates, criminals would often go against the law, and there are several loopholes to defy gun laws. Gun Control does not majorly effect the rates of violence in the way it is expected to. But really, when using regression analysis, state data, and a variety of many social and economic methods [Doctor] Murray…show more content…
Negative findings are convincing only if the analysis is done in a specific way. Not only does the modern study method for other ways that increases crime rates, it also happens to use the most advanced idea of gun control laws. This method allows seeing the effects of a state 's gun control laws on crime rates inside of the state but also allows seeing the effects of "lax gun laws" in nearby states. Many assume that gun control laws are ineffective, but why do some think that idea? Well, it could be because gun control does not effect the atitude and acts of criminals in their ways to keep and use firearms such as guns. Laws restricting citizens from gun use can be expected to obey the law and have permits, register guns, and sign up in firearm safetycourses. In contrast, studies found that criminals often go against the law by buying guns in illegal black markets or by stealing them from people who have their gun…show more content…
As discussed by David Hemenway, director of Harvard 's Injury Control Research Center, in his book Private Guns, Public Health(2004), numerous studies have found that having a gun in the home is associated with an increased risk of unintentional firearm injury, suicide and homicide. Kates contends there is no evidence that American gun laws reduce violent crime, suicide or gun accidents, relying on a 2004 report of the National Academy of Sciences. That report, however, does not suggest that legislation is an ineffective means to address gun violence. On the contrary, the thrust of the report is that additional research is needed to identify which particular policies are most likely to stem firearm-related violence and crime. Existing research does show, however, that our nation 's gun laws have had a positive impact. For example, according to the U.S. Department of Justice, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, which requires firearms dealers to conduct background checks on prospective gun purchasers, has prevented the sale of firearms to more than 1 million prohibited purchasers. Of course, our federal gun laws would be much more effective if they weren 't riddled with loopholes. The Brady Act, for example, only applies to firearms dealers.
Open Document