Is Gun Control necessary? Would it make a big difference in today’s society? Well, many of America’s people have strong opinions on gun control and seem as if they are either completely against it, or completely for it. Gun control does not drastically influence the crime rates linked to guns. Gun Although advocates argue that gun control laws reduce the incidence of violent crimes by taking away firearms; Gun laws barely effect violence rates, criminals would often go against the law, and there are several loopholes to defy gun laws.
Gun Control does not majorly effect the rates of violence in the way it is expected to. But really, when using regression analysis, state data, and a variety of many social and economic methods [Doctor] Murray
…show more content…
Negative findings are convincing only if the analysis is done in a specific way. Not only does the modern study method for other ways that increases crime rates, it also happens to use the most advanced idea of gun control laws. This method allows seeing the effects of a state 's gun control laws on crime rates inside of the state but also allows seeing the effects of "lax gun laws" in nearby states.
Many assume that gun control laws are ineffective, but why do some think that idea? Well, it could be because gun control does not effect the atitude and acts of criminals in their ways to keep and use firearms such as guns. Laws restricting citizens from gun use can be expected to obey the law and have permits, register guns, and sign up in firearm safetycourses. In contrast, studies found that criminals often go against the law by buying guns in illegal black markets or by stealing them from people who have their gun
…show more content…
As discussed by David Hemenway, director of Harvard 's Injury Control Research Center, in his book Private Guns, Public Health(2004), numerous studies have found that having a gun in the home is associated with an increased risk of unintentional firearm injury, suicide and homicide. Kates contends there is no evidence that American gun laws reduce violent crime, suicide or gun accidents, relying on a 2004 report of the National Academy of Sciences. That report, however, does not suggest that legislation is an ineffective means to address gun violence. On the contrary, the thrust of the report is that additional research is needed to identify which particular policies are most likely to stem firearm-related violence and crime. Existing research does show, however, that our nation 's gun laws have had a positive impact. For example, according to the U.S. Department of Justice, the Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993, which requires firearms dealers to conduct background checks on prospective gun purchasers, has prevented the sale of firearms to more than 1 million prohibited purchasers. Of course, our federal gun laws would be much more effective if they weren 't riddled with loopholes. The Brady Act, for example, only applies to firearms dealers.
If you recollect about it, this really should be an anticipated effect of gun control, though most people don 't remember far enough past the words "gun" and "control" to see it. When you do give up and recollect about it though, the criminals who are committing crimes at present are the ones still making this a relevant issue of discussion in the foremost position. They are the aces who are either getting access to certain weapons that are already illegal and/or the ones who are using legal weapons illegally. If it weren 't for them disregarding laws and causing these crime rates to fail up, gun control would not still be in
In an essay titled “It Is a Delusion to Think Having a Gun in the Home Makes Us Safer” Nicholas Kristof the author goes into the growing issue the people of America face. Kristof sides against the average person having possession of a gun in the debate on whether guns make your home safer. In his argument, Kristof talks about the link between crime and gun purchases. He then mentions the process for obtaining a gun and the deaths of people in relation to gun violence.
During the late 1990’s and early 2000’s murder rate was considerably increased with stricter laws regarding firearms. In central Russia, where handguns were banned, the murder rate was about 10 times more than Finland, where handguns were legal. Not only was the murder rate 10 times more than in Finland, but it was about 25 times more than Norway, where handguns were legal [3]. This is just one example of how guns can reduce murder rate. Another example is “Vermont: one of the safest five states in the country.
While opposers of gun control legislation believe that an increase in possession of guns reduce crimes and violence, statistics have revealed a strikingly positive correlation between possession of guns and violent crimes. The U.S. may only have 4.4% of the world’s population, but it has 42% of all civilian owned guns (Kodjack). There is a gun for almost every citizen, with “approximately 300 million firearms held by citizens in their homes” (Kodjak). These statistics have created great suspicion about the reliability of legislative regulations in restricting the citizens’ ability to obtain firearms, and reducing gun violence. Critics of the NRA’s activities have identified loopholes, or ways to illegally get by, certain gun laws.
Gun Control in the United States Does Gun Control work? ,and if it does work,Does gun control have to be necessary?For those who are unaware gun control refers to laws or policies that regulate manufacture, sale, transfer, possession, modification, and/or the use of firearms. According to CNN 67% of americans support gun control,when research has shown that states with stricter gun control laws have significantly higher homicide rates compared to those of states with lenient gun control laws. When talking about gun control and looking at the homicide rates of states with lenient and strict gun control laws one will realize that gun control does not work. However there are many solutions to lowering the homicide rates in states with high homicide
Some days crime rates are up and then the next they are down, what we do know is that America is becoming safer. In 2005, 11,346 persons were killed by firearm violence 477,040 persons were victims of a crime committed with a firearm, (National Institute of Justice). Surprisingly, a lot of gun violence in America is related to self defense. Between 1987 and 1990 it was found that guns were used in defense during a crime incident 64,615 times annually. This equates to two times out of 1,000 incidents (0.2%) that occurred in this time frame.
Gun laws raise the rates of many different types of crimes in America. “Between 1980 and 2009, states with more restrictive concealed weapon laws had 10% higher crime rates” (Lott, Jr.). The occurrence of higher crime in states with stricter gun laws shows that restrictions against firearms actually have a negative effect on crime. Criminal actions like auto theft in cities have become more frequent as stricter gun regulations take place (Mustard). These crimes are the cause of new laws that prevent the carry of concealed weapons since there is nothing that people have to defend themselves with.
Despite all the talk of gun violence that would make it seem like there were high rates of it, it has surprisingly gone down in the past decades. Since after President Bush’s agenda changed in 2006, the number of people prosecuted for gun using during a crime has gone down. (Novak). Gun control only puts law abiding citizens at a disadvantage. Many criminals already get their guns illegally and still find a way to get their hands on them.
‘’Guns are responsible for over thirty-three thousand deaths in the United States annually, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).. In 2014, the CDC reported that 11,008 of the 15,872 homicides committed in the United States that year involved a firearm. Of the 42,826 suicides reported that year, 21,386 involved a firearm. These statistics have inspired efforts at the federal and state levels to enact gun control legislation to reduce crime and violence’’(‘’Gun Control’’). According to the statistic guns are held for over 33,000 deaths in the United States.
Strict regulations and limitations have been pursued already and clearly do not suffice. Statics brought to attention by gun control opponents, show that gun control laws have done little to reduce crime rates. Several restrictions have been made on certain guns, considered as overly dangerous, though in the hands of an unstable criminal even a legal hunting gun can be deadly. Countless restrictions have been made, however people have still found ways around them. If people are unstable and determined enough, they will find a gun, regardless of the restrictions or regulations.
In the past, the major gun control legislations that have been put into effect have not stopped people from obtaining firearms (Gun Control.) There have also been cases in the past where cities have attempted to ban handguns. After the ban was put into effect, murder rates tended to rise instead of drop, unlike what most people might assume. Crime rates and violence also skyrocketed after the bans were put into effect. Another problem with taking guns away, or banning them, is that the government cannot expect everyone to abide by the laws.
The use of and the owning of guns is a very hot and debated topic in society today. For many, this is a life and death debate due to the recent and numerous school shootings. These school shootings have caused an outcry for more gun control, specifically in relation to the Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School shooting. Despite these calls, increased gun control is not the answer. Most gun owners’ use their guns responsibly and for good purposes.
Guns are just a tool, like knives and hammers and it completely depends on the people on how they use it. People who support guns and arms say that the Second Amendment secures individual’s right to carry guns with them and that gun rights is needed for self-protection, and was intended for military to have peace and defend the country if needed (Spitzer, 70). Most of the Americans use guns as a source to protect themselves and they believe that gun ownership prevents crime. A study conducted on November 26, 2013 showed that bans on weapons did not significantly affect murder rates at the state level (Lane, 5). Moreover, even if the rules and regulations are executed on gun control, not all criminals obey the law.
Moorhouse, John C, and Brent Wanner. “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control?” Ebscohost, 1 Jan. 2006, web.a.ebscohost.com/ehost/pdfviewer/ pdfviewer?vid=1&sid=db378b8b-d9e7-4ee7-b26c-460bc1177bd4%40sessionmgr4008. Moorhouse and Wanner, in their article “Does Gun Control Reduce Crime Or Does Crime Increase Gun Control”, studied whether or not gun control reduced gun violence in individual states. The overarching theme throughout the individual states is that gun control doesn’t reduce gun violence and is very ineffective.
Everyday in the United States, ninety families are changed forever; guns claim an average of ninety lives every day in the United States, 33,000 lives in a single year. Gun control has been a debate in the United States for many years and is constantly thrusted back into the public’s attention by horrific shootings. These shootings constantly cause individuals to petition the government to place stricter and stricter regulations of guns. However, these policies cannot be the solution to this problem. To determine a solution that will be both effective and constitutional, we must look at statistics and research that has been conducted to determine the best course of action.