Is Richard III Innocent Or Guilty

Richard the III’s name carries the weight of historic controversy. He is either the rightful heir to the English monarchy or he is guilty of the murder of his two nephews: young Edward and the young Prince of York. The claims of his innocence and guilt have been debated over centuries. It is wise to consider both viewpoints, especially as there is now more evidence to support Richard III’s innocence. After analysis of all the evidence, it is clear that Richard III is an innocent man, and rightful King of England.
The journey to proving his innocence begins on October 2, 1452 when Richard III was born at Fotheringhay Castle, in Northamptonshire, England. He is the son of Richard, the third Duke of York and Cecily Neville, Duchess of York. The

Historically, it is claimed that Richard III killed the two princes and held them hostage in the Tower of London to guarantee his succession to the throne. Richard III is painted as being greedy and ambitious, willing to do anything - including murder his two nephews - in the pursuit of power. Richard III’s image is synonymous with evil and ill will due to Shakepeare’s portrayal of the king in his famous play titled “Richard the III''. The dramatized acting in the play led the public to believe that the story was true - Richard was a murderous

His innocence is found within his character. His character, being loyal, dutiful, and a respected man. There is a quote by a man who goes by the name of Sir George Buck who wrote in 1643 “All accusations of him are not proved, And he built churches, and made good law’s, And all men held him wise, and valiant” This was a man who fought by his very side and is a witness to Richards valor. However, if his character is not satisfactory to those who are more skeptical, then look at his actions. It’s the age old saying “actions speak louder than words” Richard was consistent with his actions and his loyalty towards Edward, and he loved his nephews as if they were his own. Edward trusted Richard with such a gravity that he left Richard as protector of the young princess and keeper of his family. His innocence is also claimed through Edward IV's unexpected death. He had no motive or ambition to become king before that time. Furthermore he agreed with his brother's positions on political matters, and supported him in every aspect. Hence, when Edward the IV died he felt it his dutiful and moral obligation to ensure the crown was passed onto a legitimate