In the article I’ve chosen “Is there evidence for afterlife,” we learn about the exploration and standpoints of the afterlife. Author Joel Furches begs the question of our soul, asking us if our physical body dies off but our soul is everlasting does that mean we pose enough evidence to say there is an afterlife? Secondly, if we could resurrect just as Jesus did, would that be another key factor in justifying life after death? He certainly defends the position that since Jesus resurrected that should be enough evidence for eternal life.
That author’s major points at first glance are that of a dive into the religious outlook of what the bible and various other religions have to say about the great beyond. The reader is then immersed in the theories of what people believe to be the truth being the afterlife. We discuss the conflict between body and soul and how it relates to life after death. He then submerges us into the encounters of near-death with research done by a Christian scholar to justify the discounted stories of those who have gone through these experiences. It goes without saying, that we would of course first have to discuss the death and resurrection of Jesus because afterall he promised that this would be the same fate to his followers if they trusted him and followed the path of righteousness
…show more content…
“This idea is partially included in most forms of religion, with early religions asserting that there is a life that follows death and creating elaborate stories about the nature of this afterlife. Eastern religions held to a more migrational notion – not so much an afterlife as the recycling of souls into new bodies,” (Furches, 2023). Which beg’s the question if our soul still exists after we die, depending on one’s beliefs this idea could rationalize the idea that some part of us still does go on and would justify everlasting
In this two Christian philosophers, Richard Swinburne and Tim O'Connor, discussed the concept of neuroscience and the soul. The first philosopher, Swinburne, believed in the idea of substance dualism while O’Conner supported the argument for emergent individualism. Swinburne starts off by saying one’s physical body is simply the vehicle we interact with the world while the real essence of a person lies within their soul. When it comes to Swinburne’s belief on the soul after death I am reminded of Phaedo and how death will only bring about separation of body and soul.
At some point in their lives, almost everyone has pondered the idea of what happens to someone after death, regardless of what religion they were. For me and in my life, I have always wondered if I were to die tomorrow, would I in the eyes of Jesus be willingly brought into Heaven. Nobody can say for sure what either Heaven or Hell looks like. Granted all of this, I will describe Heaven and Hell in depth based on the writings of C.S. Lewis in his book The Great Divorce. Along with this, I will add my own perspective on why I believe Lewis portraits these places in the particular ways that he does.
In this essay I will be evaluating, predicting, and connecting. I evaluate that the author in the book is death. In the beginning it explains how everyone is going to die. And then the author goes into more detail and says things such as, do not be afraid I am nothing but fair.
Throughout history, people have wondered what happens to the soul after death. Different cultures have developed unique beliefs about life after death. Navajo, Egyptian, and Arabian mythology are just a few examples of cultures with unique beliefs about the afterlife. These three cultures differ in their understanding of death, the nature of the soul, the role of judgment, and life after death. Although afterlife in different cultures differ, they all have ideas that correlate.
who are immortal and the people who are not. Their belief is that some part of the body will survive in Hades, without having real life be present, since only the gods are immortal in their eyes. The Platonic view involves teachings of Plato and Socrates in which they believe the soul lives on after the human body dies. Transmigration is a belief in the Hindu faith where the soul of the body passes on to another body after death. Resurrection of the body is a belief in Christianity, Islam, and with the Jews where the soul is reunited with their resurrected body when the world
Survival of the individual self through resurrection can be constructed in many different theories. If one believes in personal survival after death, it is typically in the form of duplicate or literal resurrection. The reasons for these are found in a theorist 's ideas of what God can accomplish and what these resurrections constitute for the individual. Van Inwagen’s arguments for the possibility of literal resurrection and the impossibility of various other alternatives are plausible. To prove this, first, I will describe the arguments of the Aristotelian stance the belief of God’s omnipotence, which I oppose, and then present an argument based on Van Inwagen’s description of the causal chain.
Death is one of the most discussed topic that has always risen a lot of doubt and concerns . Many philosophers and writers, through the centuries, have tried to find a definition or a reason for this mysterious and inevitable event. Analyzing Plato’s Apology, he seemed to have a positive view about death. He claimed that death is a “state of nothingness and utter unconsciousness”; in fact he compared death with the act of sleeping. But since death is more deep and irreversible, humans cannot be bothering by dreams or thought while they’re died as could happen while they’re sleeping.
The beliefs of death and the aftermath of what occurs is taken from the book of Mormon. This is where theses church members receive their beliefs from and what they remain with. It is stated that at the time of death, “The spirit and body separate and "the spirits of all men, whether they be good or evil, are taken home to that God who gave them life. The righteous are received into a state of happiness, which is called paradise, a state of rest, a state of peace, where they shall rest from all their troubles and from all care and sorrow.”
[...] Afterlife The spirit can be seen and felt leaving the body. It travels westward across prairie grass, over a river and into the mountains. It ascends the mountains to the high clouds where a bright light guides it to a place where loved ones wait to embrace it. The spirit lives forever.
In the Christian faith, Christians believe that once your earthly body has passed on that your spiritual body lifts to heavenly with all of your brother and sisters in God to live eternally, only if you believe and
Kevin Yuan Professor Ananda PHIL 101 16 July 2023 Chapter 3 Paper Who am I? What is the connection between our spirit and our body? What becomes of our souls after we die? These questions are important to human minds because they help people understand themselves better and develop their own meaning in life.
In response to the long-standing philosophical question of immorality, many philosophers have posited the soul criterion, which asserts the soul constitutes personal identity and survives physical death. In The Myth of the Soul, Clarence Darrow rejects the existence of the soul in his case against the notion of immortality and an afterlife. His primary argument against the soul criterion is that no good explanation exists for how a soul enters a body, or when its beginning might occur. (Darrow 43) After first explicating Darrow 's view, I will present what I believe is its greatest shortcoming, an inconsistent use of the term soul, and argue that this weakness impacts the overall strength of his argument.
In Plato’s dialogue Phaedo, he explains the soul and comes to the conclusion that the soul is immortal. Through describing the last hours of Socrates life before his execution, he lays out three arguments in support of the idea that while the body may cease to exist the soul cannot perish. In this paper, I will explicate Socrates three arguments for the immortality of the soul and their objections. Then I will argue on the presupposition of the Law of Conservation of Mass, that the universe, entailing the soul, must be cyclical. The Law of Conservation of Mass
These are distinct “lives” and “phantoms,” both of which are separable from, and may exist outside of, the body. A life is what differs between a living body and a dead one. After death, this soul departs into an afterlife of sorts. The phantom is similar to a ghost, and appears as a fleeting being following the death of the body. His definition reflects animism, which is commonly thought of as the first type of religion and Tylor claims is the basis for the philosophy of religion.
In this paper I will show how the belief in the resurrection of the body was present in the Early Church, and that the Church Fathers conceived of the resurrected body as being healed of all its disabilities yet bearing some continuity with the self. (In this paper I will show the Church Fathers, based upon their understanding of Greco-Roman culture and philosophy along with their reading of Scripture, understood the resurrection of the dead to involve the healing/cleansing of all bodily disability.) The Christian Creed finds its fulfillment in the proclamation of the resurrection of the dead to life everlasting. Just as Christ is risen from the dead, we believe that we too will be raised to new life in Christ by the work of the Most Holy Trinity. St. Paul, in 1 Corinthians 15, asks, "What kind of body will [the faithful] come back [with]?"