In America, one of the best ways we can voice our opinions and contribute to society is by casting a vote. Local, state and national elections allow citizens to participate in the shaping of our future. The youth of America play a big role in this country, as we are the future. However, the participation of young people in the voting process is absent in recent years. Martin P. Wattenberg discusses this topic in Is Voting For Young People, a compelling text which dives into the possible reasons young people feel less and less inclined to vote over the years. In the first chapter, Wattenberg starts off by talking about the importance of newspapers and how we can benefit from the paper as a primary news source. He starts off by stating how the …show more content…
In table 2.1 wattenberg shows the decline in ratings of network news. Wattenberg credits the decline in television network news to the growing trend of “soft news”. Which could be described as any news which lightly describes information or provides entertaining news. Our generation Wattenberg describes, has become increasingly less interested in politics and more intrigued with being entertained. “By 2004 senior citizens were four times more likely to watch network news every night than those under 30 in the past week.” Wattenberg uses this statistic to represent the current age gap in nightly news. Alternatively, it can be argued that young people are not interested in nightly news because of the numerous other options we have on television. Personally, i'd way rather watch a movie than watch what's going on in the world, where they discuss the same things over and over. I think young people would rather check Twitter or Facebook for news, where it can be easily read and understood. Furthermore, implementing a fine on the American people seems almost anti-democratic in the sense that it limits your choice to not …show more content…
Wattenberg writes a compelling, factual book about the possible reasons the youth of America do not live out their civil duties. However, I think Wattenberg overanalyzes the small details and forgets to look at one common denominator. As a young person in America, it is extremely relevant to mention that most millennials have no faith in the American political system. We have seen the system fail our families, and our neighbors, and our friends. Over the years a bureaucracy has formed, and the American people are becoming increasingly dissatisfied with the course that our country's political agenda is taking. Although I don’t believe being absent from the polls is the way to solve this, it is understandable why a young person in America could feel as though their vote doesn’t matter. All in all, I believe wattenberg misses the mark on the true and nearly obvious reason the youth is not voting: we've thrown in the towel on the American political
As Americans, we are so fortunate to have been born with the inalienable right to vote. If I can convince just one young person to Rock the Vote, it will be a worthwhile accomplishment (though I hope to reach many
Running Through the Six With Your Votes As the years drag on and the ever looming realization begins to set in. We are almost adults, and what do adults do? They vote. They roll out of bed at some early hour in the morning, when birds are screeching and no normal person has had their morning coffee, only to make the effort in the attempt to better society.
Letting a new age group vote will help show the diversity that is among them. In the article Shin writes about how “some opponents said that young people barely old enough to drive a car don’t have enough perspective to vote.” This argument is valid because it is true that many young voters don’t have the experience to vote. It can still be undone by the fact that only informed individuals are willing to vote at such a young age. This is done through the fact that many young voters were prompted by this new right, to go out and seek the information needed to be well informed
Since the founding of America in 1776 countless people have either become disenfranchised by the federal government or backed the government. From laws being passed to decisions being made there will always be a division amongst the American people. Whether arguing over gun laws or citizenship rights, the debate is always there and met with some form of counter argument from either side. What makes America so great is the fact that you have the right to have a voice and speak out for your opinions. One of the greatest ways for a citizen to be heard is voting.
What’s the best right that we have in Canada? Well, of course it’s the right to vote. In Canada, everyone is entitled the right to vote as long as they fit 2 requirements which are to be a Canadian Citizen and 18 years of age or older. It might have taken a while for some particular groups to get the right to vote, but today all groups are allowed to vote if the 2 requirements are met. Canadians have been voting since 1792 in Upper and Lower Canada elections, but have been voting in one united election in 1867, when we formed as one united nation known as Canada.
Voter turnout in American has the tendency to be increasingly low. A large portion of the United States population that is eligible to vote does not take part in election day. Many factors have the potential of contributing to the low voter turnout; however, some theories stand out. In America, election voting takes place on a Tuesday and requires the voters to register. Most Americans eligible to vote obtain a full time job and simply can not find the time to vote.
Institutional supports enable opportunities for some but not others. Adult gatekeepers, such as teachers and social workers, remain critically important in selecting those who have access to opportunities. In our view, the dynamic of gatekeeping, ‘othering’, and exclusion are important when attempting to capture the multifaceted contemporary landscape of youth civic engagement. These insights suggest that traditional markers of difference (i.e. ethnicity, gender, S.E.S.) continue to mediate access to civic engagement landscape in powerful ways. The study reminds us that while the new landscape of youth civic engagement is exciting in many ways, traditional markers of difference (i.e. age, ethnicity, gender, religious affiliation, and socioeconomic status) continue to importantly mediate how ‘social change-oriented’ youth access opportunities and advocate for
Today, registering to vote remains the basic right of passage for most high school seniors. Reviewing this chart one can see that youth turnout has steadily declined since 1972, when 50 percent of 18 to 24 year olds voted. By 1988, youth voter turnout plummeted to 36 percent. 46 million young people ages 18-29 years old are eligible to vote. Involving young people in election-related learning, activities and discussion can have an impact on the young person’s household, increasing the likelihood that others in the household will vote.
Next, one has to consider whether institutional or attitudinal electoral influences is more persuasive when explaining the voter turnout decline observed since the 1960’s. Piven and Cloward’s notion that party systems, electoral practices, and institutional barriers discourage and limit voting, as seen with the and Motor Voter Act, can remain true, but should be analyzed through the lens of registration. The Motor Voter Act was successful in regards to increasing registration and interest in voting. However, there was no significant increase in the voter turnout after the Motor Voter Law was implemented. Concerning Powell’s studies that voter turnout is disadvantaged by party systems, registration requirements, distance to voting location,
In Austria, where the voting age has been lowered to 16, two thirds of the 16-18 year old age group voted. This proves that if we were to reduce the voting age, it could encourage younger citizens to become even more politically aware and even inspire some to pursue a career in politics. Personally, I think it is an unfair assumption that all millennials are considered to be narcissistic when certain studies have shown that they are intensely passionate about global warming, the corrupt government of North Korea and other pressing issues affecting the whole world. Granted, you do not often see two teenagers arguing over whether this year’s budget aided global warming research or not, but these young Australian citizens have their own way of expressing their political views. They start petitions online, call out politicians on social media and even go out to protests, standing up for what they believe in.
Voter turnout in Canadian elections has been declining for decades at all levels of government, particularly among young people (Adsett, 247). This phenomenon brings about concern involving the engagement among Canadian youth, or lack thereof, in formal political activity. In fact, it is argued that civic duty among young people is considerably low compared to older counterparts. Due to changes in political interests and contrasting attitudes towards politics among different age demographics, youth are less likely to involve themselves through traditional forms of politics. As a result of this decline, Canadian youth are unable to shape social agenda, particularly surrounding youth issues, as political parties will not address the needs of
As the baby boomers continue to become older, millennials take their place. As life continues, involvement will steadily decrease. One example of this intercohort change is political participation.
Yet, to avoid this, we can teach them how not to be swayed at school. According to the Electoral Reform Society, they support young citizens at the age of 16 in how to vote and what decision making they should do. If teenagers get the support from authorized adults who can lead young adults to the right path through society, I believe we can trust their opinions. The Fulcrum exclaims that the Ontario Government already recognizes that 16 year olds can understand the issues and independent judges on them. From this, we can say that adults keep full eye on young adults and what kind of thinking they have towards politics so it is safe for teenagers to start voting.
All things considered if the council wanted to boost turnout, they could’ve put the issue on the ballot, there were other solutions. It 's understandable, as a 17 year old myself I see the way some 16 and 17-year-olds are and I’d be cautious to grant them voting rights too but as stated before, I believe that although we lack experience, the City Council should still allow 16 and 17-year olds to vote. Obviously, it will be up to the City Council members to implement certain justifications to ensure that the teenagers registering to vote are both knowledgeable and interested in voting. If the problem is voter turnout every extra vote counts and with a little background knowledge even the smallest amount can make a difference. Voting is afterall a privilege and thus should not have any discriminations no matter what sex, color, race or
With time comes changes, and these changes are widely observed throughout history as the societal norms, values, and politics of a region shift. In the text The Silent Revolution by Ronald Inglehart, there is an analysis of these changes between the people of a jurisdiction and their influence on politics. The topic of this work still holds true today, because the first world continues to prioritize more post material values, as opposed to the bare necessities, and it is demonstrated in the ideals of differing generations.