It goes without saying that being raised in a single parent household is one of the most important issues facing us today. To start with this is an every color and religion problem everyone faces today. But people are entitled to their own opinion on this topic. Isabel V. Sawhill and W.Bradford Wilcox have an article discussing there viewpoints on if in trouble. I would have to say I agree Sawhill regarding the “ Yes” argument because living in a single parent household it is hard on your self esteem thinking maybe it was you that made your parent leave and I grew up mentally faster than most kids because I felt like I had to be strong for my mother. Isabel V. Sawhills argument was that she agreed that the American Family is in trouble. Some …show more content…
First of all, Wilcox makes arguments on marriages that do not make it and those are the ones that have both parents who are working full-time jobs. He argues in the article,” I have painted here can be found among married couples with children where both spouses work full time” (54) It should not matter if both parents work full time, there should be compromised for both spouses but in the article he insinuates that it is the womens fault for the marriage not working by stating ” Many married mothers; wives in these marriages do about five hours more of total work per week and enjoy six hours less free time per week than their husband” (54) Wilcox is implying that women should not be going five more hours than their husbands like this is not 1960 women and men should be equal, it should not feel like a dictatorship in your own home. Another point worth noting is Wilcox undoubtedly feels like marriages that absolutely work are when the men work full time and the women part-time which is ridiculous and ignorant. One reason behind this is Wilcox goes on to claim”most married mothers do not work full time and wish to not work full time“(54) but that goes back to what I announced earlier in my paper, men will always feel like their above women and its outrages, women can work just as well as men and some might argue better. Men feel like
Yes, I do agree with the article because in my opinion the 60s ideal family was a historical anomaly. Even studying U.S. history on its own reveals the vast majority of families had two working parents. While only one might work outside the home, the other still worked to contribute to the family income or at least lessen the family expenses. I believe the decline in the traditional family is the result, at least in part, by a lack of earnings and increased levels of consumption. Many families need dual-incomes so they can provide for their family.
In 1900, only six percent of women that were married worked, instead these women were housewives and took care of the home and children. However, fifty percent of non-married women worked, but they likely stopped working once married. Only thirty-three percent women that were divorced or widowed during this time worked, and those that did worked out of need. These percentages are compared to an eighty-six percent of men, married or not, that were employed during this time period.
Lewis states “With fewer jobs available, employers generally preferred to award those they had to men who'd traditionally worn the mantle of the family breadwinner.” With men being the breadwinners of the family they could get jobs way easier and it wasn’t hard for them. With fewer jobs available, employees choose men to work there instead of women and that was taking multiple opportunities away from women getting jobs. Motherhood and homemaking became regarded as the proper fulfilling roles for women. Lewis also states “The wage gap was justified by the stereotype of the male breadwinner needing earnings that would support not just himself, but a traditional family—whether he was married or not.”
Foster care is something that America has put a lot of time and effort into to get right. Foster care will be defined as any place where a child is taken from their family of residence or who has no able guardian at birth. These are included but not limited to foster parents, group homes, residentials, and emergency shelters (5). Though we have put time, effort, and money into getting things right, foster care is still a dangerous and traumatizing place for children. Foster care has long been considered a “National Disgrace” due to the influx of missing children, complaints of maltreatment, and even deaths (5).
Life comes with the difficulty of trying to manage family and career at the same time. In the article, “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All,” the author Anne-Marie Slaughter is explaining how tough it is to balance family and career together. You have to take out time for your kids or else they will drift away from you, but you also have your job to handle or else you will lose that. Women have not yet received the fairness with men in workforce. I believe that it is tough for a women to handle her family and career together, and men get recognized more than women in the workforce.
Children who grow up in a single parent home can have a sacrificed childhood, can grow up too fast and may need to learn life skills from others. Children of single
Women and the battle to maintain a work-lifestyle balance has been consistently debated and toyed with by society for ages. Anne-Marie Slaughter, Professor of Politics and author of “Why Women Still Can’t Have It All” explains the continuous hardship of balancing a career and a family; as well, Stephen Marche, writer and author of “Home Economics: The Link Between Work-Life and Income Equality” combats Slaughter’s article and the many gaps present in society. Slaughter and Marche compare and contrast the differences of the leadership gap between men and women, the strategies of maintaining a work-balance lifestyle in regards to family, and the type of dialogue representing men in articles written by women. Anne-Marie Slaughter and Stephen
By combining both hours spending in the office and taking care of the house and kids, men and women roughly have worked the same amount of hours (fifty-eight hours for men and fifty-nine for women) according to
Today’s women easily out do that argument. Even though women are still primarily the caretaker of the family, they perform that job by doing so much more that just being a stay at home mom. “About 41 percent of mothers are primary breadwinners
However, after further review of why this is impacted so highly, it was brought to everyone’s attention that women sometime bring the wage gap to light all on their own; by accepting job’s that are lower on wage scale compared to other position to which they could apply for. “In support of this model, because now women now demonstrate less discontinuous work patterns than in the past, their wages have increased, and the wage gap is decreased” (Penner, 2008: Napari, 2009 as cited in Lindsey, 2011, pg. 293). Because women choose to take jobs that required fewer hours and responsibility, women now had more time during the day to take care of other duties away from work; such as household chores making their pay decrease set in stone. This is where functionalism comes to light, because with the women away from their outside jobs; men are gaining more recognition for being on the job more often than these women. This helping to boost these men’s self-esteem while these men work qualities improve, soon giving them the classification as being the sole wage earners in the home.
In a lot of countries, gender plays a big role in the labor market. For instance, in America, the middle full-time compensation for ladies is 77 percent of that of men [4]. In any case, women who work low maintenance make more than men who work low maintenance [4]. Furthermore, among individuals who never wed or have children, women make more than men [4]. It might be hard to explain such contrasts.
Women realizes that without work and salary had make them lost their confident as individual to pursuing a professional job because they don’t know their worth anymore. For example the author state, “a Time magazine cover story on “The Case for Staying Home” and a “60 Minutes” segment devoted to a group of former mega-achievers who were, as the anchor Lesley Stahl put it, “ giving up money, success and big futures” to be home with their children. (Warner, 2013) Women thought that by stay home will solve the relationship issues and that women will be recognize as a good mother, but O’Donnel’s experience prove this to be wrong. Women who are working, they value their self more and put their self in front of a lot of things like marriage and manage work
There are many examples on how gender roles have changed in society dramatically. However, one might imply that women working has a toll on the children at home. According to Source 2, on the bar graphs, 74% of people agree that having a job makes it harder to raise children since their mom is going to be busy most of the time. Regardless, this argument is not correct to make due to the fact that moms are working to provide for
Because, in capitalist societies, most women are in the secondary market usually hunting jobs. They are offered either part time jobs or those with little benefits unsustainable. In opposite, men are in that primary market. Men have stationary and sustainable jobs with higher wages, and more benefits (Anderson, 2012).
I feel that this class has changed my whole perception of what family work is, the importance of not getting caught up in the content and focussing on the process of identifying strengths that the family has which can be used to perpetuate ongoing homeostasis. This course also highlighted for me how much more I still need to learn about supporting the family system. I have been working with families for about 10 years, mostly with supporting positive parenting and also with families who have children and youth experiencing mental health concerns. I feel that my process orientated interactions have been effective for my gathering of information but not necessarily helpful for the long-term healthy coping of the family. By watching you, listening to your teachings and participating and observing role plays I feel that these experiences have led to not only practical knowledge but a new perspective of the importance of stepping back and trying to walk in the client’s shoes.