ipl-logo

Ivan Chetvyorty: The Reign Of Ivan The Terrible

1095 Words5 Pages

Ivan Chetvyorty Vasilyevich or Ivan the Terrible, was born on August 25, 1530, in the Grand Duchy of Muscovy, Russia. He became the first tsar of all Russia and he was said to be sensitive and intelligent, but Ivan agreeably had a complex personality. After being completely orphaned at age 8 Ivan’s personality became hateful and erratic. He was neglected by the people that watched over him, ensuing his parent’s death. In adulthood, he earned the nickname “Grozny,” which means “formidable or sparking terror.” Over the years of Ivan’s regime, he seized private lands and directed a reign of terror. However, his efforts disturbed the economy and culture. Subsequently after Ivan the Terrible’s death, his country was left in anarchy. Ivan …show more content…

Amid the constructive period in Ivan’s clout, he popularized self-government, reformed tax collection, and instituted statutory law and church reform. The tsar had quite prompt and constructive ideas to better the country. The schemes that he suggested were carried out, but a number of them failed. They crumbled due to Ivan the Terrible’s temper.
A massive fire struck Moscow on the 21st of June, 1547, nearly a year after Ivan's coronation. The city’s mostly wooden buildings quickly capitulated to the flames. Even the surrounded fortress of Kremlin that looked down over the city was damaged. All structures within the city were extensively flawed from the flames. The tsar was furious due to the fact that two-thirds of his city were destroyed. He was furious, thinking the fire was intentionally sent. Ivan retaliated by having people executed in Red Square.
In 1556, he established principles on the obligations of the boyar class in betterance to the crown. During his youth, Ivan took a chance at governing in a progressive manner. He proposed an informal government called the Elected Rada. This was a circle of confidants, young representatives of the aristocracy and the clergy. The Rada enforced a series of crucial reforms. It fixed all power into the hands of the tsar, limiting the boyars’ authority. Ivan later gave up on the union and began governing

Show More
Related

  • Psycho-Japanese War Dbq

    698 Words  | 3 Pages

    Nicholas II was extremely strict when it came to his government and as a result forbade any form of democracy in Russia and imposed absolute autocracy on all the citizens. His domestic policy was so strict political parties were illegal to form and he even made the Okhrana, a secret police that arrested and imprisoned any political critics, rebels, or those who voiced a negative opinion against the Russian autocracy. As a result, the citizens, especially those of lower class, despised the government and would often attempt to revolt. However, since the revolts were unorganized and ineffective, Nicholas II was able to end them very swiftly. After the defeat in the Russo-Japanese War in 1905, Russia suffered extreme humiliation as well as economic decline.

    Read More

  • Examples Of Dehumanization In Night By Elie Wiesel

    679 Words  | 3 Pages

    He experienced the brutal losses of his family, along with everything he owns, his faith, and almost his sanity. Many hundreds of miles away in 1570, a Russian tzar named Ivan IV Vasilyevich, better known now as Ivan the Terrible from an arguably more accurate mistranslation of his title “The Severe”, waged a massacre on the independently-minded city of Novgorod, lasting only five weeks yet leaving thousands dead; though the city’s population could not have been more than 100,000, around 30,000 were murdered, leaving 20,000 more to perish from the aftermath (Erenow, “ Massacre- Ivan The Terrible”).

    Read More

  • Joseph Stalin Dbq Essay

    696 Words  | 3 Pages

    To do this, he used his totalitarian government to set up a secret police that would carry out his dirty work. He gave them unlimited power to convict or even murder people that swayed from his beliefs. This caused people to think that he was power hungry and not fit to rule. They wanted him to be replaced by someone that was less rude and more thoughtful of the Russian citizens. (Document One)

    Read More

  • Was Tsar Nicholas Responsible For The Collapse Of The Romanov Dynasty?

    1052 Words  | 5 Pages

    Maybe he thought that by copying other successful tsars he could be one too. He much preferred spending time with his wife and children, a devoted ‘family man’, as shown in source 7, a royal portrait. The Russian economy was also declining and crumbling because of factors out of his control such as a series of failed crop seasons, which caused a lack of food sources, leading to inflation. There were also some political factors which may have led to the end of the dynasty, like the faulty legal system, which had no formal court of appeals who could look at and assess the Tsar’s laws. I also find it hard to believe that one person alone could cause such a downfall of a long established line of rulers, after all there were plenty equally, if not more, incompetent Romanov tsars who didn’t cause the collapse of the family.

    Read More

  • Tokugawa Shogunate Close Japan To Foreign Influence Essay

    543 Words  | 3 Pages

    The Russian leader, Ivan IV, as known as Ivan the Terrible, was remembered for a patron of arts and trade and founder of the Moscow Print Yard. He is also remembered for his paranoia and arguably harsh treatment of the Russian nobility.

    Read More

  • Czar Nicholas And The Romanov Dynasty

    1227 Words  | 5 Pages

    Czar Nicholas and the Romanov Dynasty: Czar Nicholas was the last czar of the Romanov (Russian) Dynasty to rule Russia. Czar Nicholas and the Romanov Dynasty played a crucial role in provoking the start of the Russian Revolution (“Romanov Dynasty”). During the Russian Revolution, Russia was beginning to fall towards an economic corruption. Czar Nicholas was aware of the severity of lack of human necessities, yet he ignored the citizens. As a result, the citizens rioted the capital of Petrograd, making demands for food and better working conditions.

    Read More

  • Why Did The Romanov Dynasty Fall Apart In The 1900

    1649 Words  | 7 Pages

    The Rurik dynasty ended in disarray, and the civil turmoil that followed precipitated the beginning of the Romanov dynasty. As explained in the video analysis of the Romanov family’s demise, the death of Fyodor I, the last ruler of the Rurik dynasty in 1598, brought on a 15 year period of chaos and madness in Russia (Downfall of the Romanov Family). Additionally, this 15 year period was called The Time of Troubles where foreign interventions, peasant uprisings, political disputes caused social and economic disruptions which threatened the survival of the state (Downfall of the Romanov Family). Ivan the Terrible’s brutal actions formed the basis of the Romanov dynasty. When Ivan the Terrible murdered his son and unborn grandson, he died without an heir, which resulted in the formation of a new dynasty– the Romanov dynasty.

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Ivan IIv And Napoleon Bonaparte

    1224 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the next three decades he destroyed much of the major boyar families and influenced Russia to do what he felt right. Much later in the Reign of Terror, Ivan beat his

    Read More

  • How Did Tsar Nicholas II's Impact On Russia

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    Influenced mostly by Konstantin and his father, he became a strong believer in autocracy (system of government by one person with absolute power). Later on, when Nicholas II

    Read More

  • 1917 Revolution Dbq

    1224 Words  | 5 Pages

    During the 20th century, Russia was experiencing turmoil in war and the country was deeply affected with Tsar Nicholas’s wrong decisions and lack of experience in politics. After the 1917 revolution in Russia, Lenin became the ruler of Russia and the USSR and proved to be the best Russian ruler of the 20th century. Before then, Tsarism dominated and Nicholas II was in power until he foresaw many revolutions against his methods of ruling. He remained as the supreme ruler and did not take actions for reforms. However, after the 1917 revolution, which Lenin masterminded, the Tsar was overthrown and the Bolsheviks established a stable government which took control in Russia.

    Read More

  • Czar Nicholas 2 Research Paper

    471 Words  | 2 Pages

    The people forced the imperial government to resign, and on March 15th the people got their wish when “Czar Nicholas abdicated his throne( Russian Revolution History.com)”. When he abdicated his throne in favor of his brother a lot of the problems he caused were fixed. And because his brother didn't accept the Czarship it ended Czarism.

    Read More

  • Tsar Nicholas II: Determining Factor In The Decline Of The Romanov Dynasty

    911 Words  | 4 Pages

    Nicholas II’s inability to respond to or embrace change was the determining factor in the decline of the Romanov Dynasty. To what extent is this statement accurate? Introduction: The inability of Tsar Nicholas 11 to respond to or embrace political and social change during a time of crisis contributed significantly to the collapse of the Romanov rule over Russia.

    Read More

  • Peter The Great Modernized Russia Essay

    739 Words  | 3 Pages

    “I will drag you kicking and screaming into the modern world”, this famous quote from the Czar, Peter the Great involved a lot of symbolic changes. In the 16th to 17th century Russia was considered to be a country that was out of order and brutal in the eyes of major powers in Europe. However, after the rule of Peter the Great, this view changed and Russia was no longer seen as a “backwards” nation. Peter the Great modernized Russia by infusing 'western' technology and by forcing his people to reject many of their orthodox christian, 'tradition-bound' customs. Specifically these included: forcing the male population to wear western clothes and cutting their beards (or pay tax), building a modern Navy, melting down Church bells to make cannons, and lastly, building a new capital city his so called, "window to the west."

    Read More

  • Infamy And Responsibility In Nicholas II's Government

    484 Words  | 2 Pages

    Upon his arrival to the throne, Nicholas II followed the food steps of his father, Alexander III. He intended to maintain spirit of autocracy regarding the political, social, and economic spheres. He believed that autocracy suited best to Russia. Any other political regime, in his view, could make the country vulnerable to a revolution. Nicholas thought of his role of an autocrat as being a guardian responsible only to God for his stewardship: “In the sight of my Maker I have to carry the burden of a terrible responsibility and at all times, therefore, be ready to render an account to Him of my actions.

    Read More

  • Was The Russian Revolution Inevitable Essay

    716 Words  | 3 Pages

    Furthermore, they wanted to start revolution against decisions made by their tragic excuse of a czar, Nicholas II. These transactions proposed as the idea of a revolution gained followers and grew greatly in hopes to create change. These transactions were right because they opposed what the people needed, which was equal treatment and protection for not only people of higher authority, but yet for everyone. Once Lenin gained control of Russia as new czar, great changes were created. As proposed, Lenin followed through with his wanted changes and made them present in Russian society.

    Read More

More about Ivan Chetvyorty: The Reign Of Ivan The Terrible

Open Document