ipl-logo

Jack Phillips Mistake Fake For Gay Marriage

279 Words2 Pages

America is a free county where individuals can make their own decision according to their believes. Gay marriage or same sex marriage in America is considered legal for people who do it. Every human is created different, also have different believes, considerations and prospective in everything that we do. In this case of Jack Phillips who refused to bake cake for same sex marriage, I think Phillips shouldn’t be in court because he didn’t break any laws nor did illegal crime. Jack refused make a cake because he stands against it .According to Jack Phillips “For me to violate that would be for me to rebel against God, to take what he 's designed and say it doesn 't matter." I agree with Jack as a Christian the bible doesn’t tell us to

Show More
Related

  • Summary Of Letter From Birmingham Jail

    479 Words  | 2 Pages

    He also states that the breaking of certain laws is a practiced that can be seen throughout history, "It was practiced superbly by the early Christians, who were willing to face hungry lions and the excruciating pain of chopping blocks rather than to submit to certain unjust laws of the Roman Empire." Because

    Read More

  • Obergefell V. Hodges Case In The US

    955 Words  | 4 Pages

    Same-sex marriage has a near even split of people that are for or against it. This split is seen clearly in the Obergefell v. Hodges case in the U.S. Supreme Court, where the decision was 5 to 4. The majority in this case chose to legalize same-sex marriage in all 50 states. This decision brought a lot of controversy from the U.S. citizens, and the controversy came from the question if the Supreme Court decision in Obergefell was the correct decision for America. The answer is no.

    Read More

  • Macalia Dissent Case Summary

    1849 Words  | 8 Pages

    Justice Scalia of the United States Supreme Court produced a dissent after the decision made in Obergefell v. Hodges and expressed his reasons behind what he believed to be an incredibly poor decision made by the Court. In the dissent Scalia explains how the decision could be a threat to the way the American Government works and could have a serious effect on our future. Past decisions made by the Court as well as past interpretations of the Constitution are both a part of Scalia’s argument. These components of his argument all contribute to his overall strategy to in the dissent. To explain his vote against gay marriage, Scalia uses his knowledge of the US system of government and plays on the emotions of the US citizens who have a strong

    Read More

  • Obergefell V. Hodges (2005)

    2137 Words  | 9 Pages

    Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

    Read More

  • Case Study: Obergefell V. Hodges

    478 Words  | 2 Pages

    Obergefell v Hodges 2015 Obergefell v Hodges (2015) is a landmark 5 to 4 decision in favor of legalizing gay marriage. James Obergefell petitioned the state 's ban on same sex marriage. He argued that it is a fundamental guaranteed under the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of The Declaration Of Independence

    619 Words  | 3 Pages

    To break a law is to disrespect what the founding fathers fought and died for, and to forget what the Veterans fight for everyday. Up until 2015, Gay Americans weren’t allowed to marry. Marriage is a American given right, it shouldn't matter what your sexual orientation is. If this right was finally given two years ago, think of all the other laws protecting american citizen’s freedoms that still need to be amended. The Declaration only brisked all American freedoms, there will always be room for

    Read More

  • Full Faith And Credit Clause Analysis

    835 Words  | 4 Pages

    Kristen Irvine 9/22/15 AP Government Ms. Suski Federalism The relationship between the states as outlined by sections one, two, and four of Article four in the Constitution examines how states should interact between each other. The first section of this amendment is the Full Faith and Credit Clause which says that judicial decrees and contracts made in one state will be binding and enforceable in any other state. The second section of Article four states that citizens of one state shall be entitled to the same privileges and immunities in another state. The fourth section of the fourth Article states that the federal government will ensure a republican form of government in all states. These four sections of the Fourth Amendment are all

    Read More

  • In Lord Of The Flies, Piggy: An Analysis

    1013 Words  | 5 Pages

    For the past year society's standards of homosexuals has changed dramatically, last summer gay marriage has been legalized in all 50 states in the us. Now sympathizers of transgender are trying to advocate for bathroom changes for transgender, these people are demanding equal rights to bathrooms that they associate with. I personally find this outrageous and immoral. The concept is very ludicrous, why are we allowing people to choose their gender? It’s ridiculous, I personally believe or would like to think that all children were raised as one gender, and that their parents educated them on the simple concept of where to use the restrooms.

    Read More

  • Don T Be Hatin Analysis

    124 Words  | 1 Pages

    “Same-sex couples don’t have the legal rights traditional couples do... That’s what discrimination is”(Liu, paragraph 3). America is supposed to be the”getaway country”. Which means that everyone has equal rights no matter how unique. So if gay marriage is illegal, then same-sex couples

    Read More

  • The Importance Of The First Ten Amendments

    483 Words  | 2 Pages

    We are allowed to voice our opinions. There is separation of church and state, which means that there can’t be laws made about religion. Recently, gay marriage was made legal in all fifty states. However, a judge in Kentucky has denied same-sex couples marriage licenses. It could be argued that if she denied it for her own religious beliefs, it violates the First Amendment.

    Read More

  • Second Amendment Diversity

    1013 Words  | 5 Pages

    The cultural war between majority and minority has been an ongoing struggle in America because we believe in Democracy. A government ruled by the people and for the people is tested when minorities and majorities butt heads on social issues. Many times the majority has the political power to influence legislation to the detriment of the minority leaving members of the minority group to seek justice through the court system. This was the case for the LGBT community when they fought against Colorado’s 2nd Amendment which they felt limited their protections as a minority class. Colorado, in 1992, was one of the first states to experience a rising cultural conflict between the LGBT community and religious groups.

    Read More

  • Bowers Vs Hardwick Case Study

    1225 Words  | 5 Pages

    If one read the Lawrence v. Texas case one will understand that upon further review of the constitution one can see that there is no violation in the constitution that insinuates homosexual sexual activity being against human right. It is only logical that if sexual practices are taking place in the privacy of ones homes regardless of the gender there is no conviction of wrong doing. Equal protection due process protects against discrimination regarding sexuality therefore making it unconstitutional to discriminate anyone based on their sexual orientation. Discrimination of race was overruled unconstitutional due to the famous words of “all mean are created equal… by having life, liberty, and pursuit of happiness” (Andersen, M, E.), with life there is liberty of human rights, and with liberty comes happiness with the acceptance of an individual’s identity as one.

    Read More

  • Conservative And Liberal View Of Abortion

    1027 Words  | 5 Pages

    Liberals support same-sex marriage and argue that love is grounds enough for marriage, regardless of sexual orientation. Conservatives are usually opposed and often cite religious viewpoints and concerns about the reading of children as the main reasons for their opposition. In the 1970s the court case Baker v. Nelson occurred. It was a case in which the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a state law limiting marriage to persons of the opposite sex did not violate the U.S. Constitution. On June 26, 2015 the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states.

    Read More

  • Gay Marriage Persuasive Research Paper Outline

    1612 Words  | 7 Pages

    Marriage is a contract between two people and honestly I think that the society should not be interfering this bond. Not permitting the right to marry another human is a severe violation of the human rights and freedom. James Carville “I was against gay marriage until I realized that I didn’t have one.” The statement is self-explanatory: “You don’t get to judge because you don’t have the

    Read More

  • Essay On Unjust Law

    1666 Words  | 7 Pages

    Men make laws to instill order in a society and prevent chaos in any shape or form. Naturally, laws will always be somewhat unjust because it is impossible to consistently construct laws that directly and equally benefit all members of a society. There will always be a majority that makes the laws and a minority that has to obey the laws. Although laws are usually the standard of morality by which we live by, they must be disobeyed in certain situations. These situations are, but not limited to, an undemocratic formation of aforementioned laws, laws that are inherently unjust according to human law which can be synonymous with God’s law.

    Read More

More about Jack Phillips Mistake Fake For Gay Marriage

Open Document