ipl-logo

Jackson's Removal Dbq

218 Words1 Page

Jackson’s plans of removal were favored by many Americans as he convinced them that it was practical and for the better good of Native Americans. Jackson stated that he had given them many incentives to leave. Native Americans would be provided with ample supplies and supported for a year after their move to western lands. Jackson believed that this was a practical resolution to the issues developing between the two nations. Jackson acknowledged that the intrusion of Americans onto western land was occurring, but he did not believe that it was a genuine problem. He also wrote, in 1835, “A barrier has thus been raised for their protection against the encroachment of our citizens, and guarding the Indians as far as possible from those evils (...)”.

Show More
Related

  • Evaluation Of Andrew Jackson's Native American Policies

    148 Words  | 1 Pages

    Jackson’s Native American policies were very undemocratic because they decreased the power of the people. Document 9 states that the Native Americans have reasons to stay on their land, one being that the land west of the Arkansas Territory is unknown to them. Another is that the region is poorly supplied with food and water and that the new neighbors have different customs and a totally different language. Finally, they wish to remain on the land in which their ancestors died and where they were buried. The evidence helps explain that Andrew Jackson’s Native American policy was very undemocratic because the Native Americans had four very good reasons for staying on their homeland.

    Read More

  • How Does Andrew Jackson Use Land As A Symbol Of Human Existence?

    918 Words  | 4 Pages

    Furthermore, President Andrew Jackson felt so passionately about owning land that he was willing to forcibly remove the indigenous people from their natural land. In his address to congress on The Indian Removal Act he writes, “. By opening the whole territory between Tennessee on the north and Louisiana on the south to the settlement of the whites it will incalculably strengthen the southwestern frontier and render the adjacent States strong enough to repel future invasions without remote aid. It will relieve the whole State of Mississippi and the western part of Alabama of Indian occupancy, and enable those States to advance rapidly in population, wealth, and power”. This captures the idea that by obtaining land Americans will be doing a greater deed than ridding the country of the “savage” Native Americans.

    Read More

  • An Analysis Of Andrew Jackson's Bank Veto Message

    700 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of many atrocities that Jackson committed was the forceful removal of thousands of Indians and the subsequent death of many of them. Although his reasoning, as is stated in his Message to Congress "On Indian Removal," was

    Read More

  • Jacksonian Democratic Ideals

    468 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout the early 19th century, changing politics and an evolving society in America impacted all classes of people, specifically the white working class. Jacksonian Democratic ideals was influenced by the working class, and the white working class benefited from President Jackson’s decisions. During the year of Jackson’s presidential election, the Workies, which consisted of working men, wanted to protect individuals who earned money from arduous labor, but failed to make payments punctually. Jacksonian Democrats realized the Workies language was valuable in the fact that beliefs of the Workies group echoed through Jackson’s party.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain

    601 Words  | 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson, Is he a hero or a villain Since his presidency he has done many terrible things. Like the time his actions were what caused the wipeout of almost all the indians. His ratio of good and bad topples off on the bad side. Andrew Jackson is a villain. Due to Jackson 's actions there have been many consequences to people around him.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Abuse Of Power Summary

    170 Words  | 1 Pages

    The Indian Removal Act authorized Jackson to give the Indians land west of the Mississippi in exchange for their land in the states, but could not force them to leave. He violated and broke commitments that he even negotiated with them. He tried to bribe the Indians and even threatened some of them. Alfred Cave organizes his article thematically and is trying to prove

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Hero Research Paper

    480 Words  | 2 Pages

    Although this act was harsh, to some it overshadows the good that Jackson did. In the source: Letter from Elias Boudinot, Cherokee Indian, Elias says, “Removal, then, is the only remedy, the only practical remedy. Our people may finally rise from their very ashes, to become prosperous and happy, and a credit to our race.” The quote is from a Cherokee Indian agreeing that the removal might be the best thing for the Native Americans. Andrew Jackson is a hero because he worked to bring more democracy to the

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Dbq

    428 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to “Memorial to the Cherokee Nation”, the land was bad out west. One of the Cherokee even saying,“The far greater part of that region is… badly supplied with food and water” This means that Jackson wanted to move the native Americans somewhere where they would not be able to thrive. And according to the “Indian Removal Map”, it shows that some tribes had to travel hundreds of miles, and some even cross large bodies of water. Jackson knew they would have to do this.

    Read More

  • Trail Of Tears Analysis

    992 Words  | 4 Pages

    On the other hand, for people who have Indian heritage, might consider this a horrible act passed by President Jackson. It could be vice versa as well. In reality, though, Jackson really did want what was best for his country, even if that included getting rid of Indians to another region. I believe that he wanted the best for the tribes too and that he wanted all of them to be together, just not in this particular land. Overall, I think that Andrew Jackson had very good intentions, they just might have come off as discourteous or inconsiderate to

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: Not Guilty Of Crimes Against Humanity

    1737 Words  | 7 Pages

    He believed Jackson needed a reality check. The Indians were there first, it was their land. He force the Natives to move away from their homeland, with brute force. He believes Jackson could not justify his actions just because it was for America’s benefit. He also stated Jackson refused to listen to many people, and he refused to let Indians live.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson: A Hero Or Villain?

    865 Words  | 4 Pages

    Andrew Jackson’s sentiment towards the Native Americans was certainly not a kind one. Manifest destiny was a popular belief among Americans, including Jackson, and he would go to the extent of forcing Native Americans out of their homes to reach their “ordained goal”. He believed in the expansion of southern slavery which is why he pushed for removing the Indians west of the Mississippi, which makes it the more disgraceful. The Indian Removal Act of 1830 said that it will allow American government to offer in-state territories to the Indian’s for their western land. This wasn’t the case when the U.S. went in and drove the Indians out by force.

    Read More

  • Andrew Jackson Good Or Bad

    516 Words  | 3 Pages

    Andrew Jackson has been remembered as a ground breaking president, even being put on the $20. President Jackson was a controversial figure, doing many popular and unpopular things in his time. Although he is remembered as a hero from the war of 1812, he also caused the Trail of Tears and tried to destroy the National Bank. As a result, Jackson should not be put on the $20 bill. His actions have caused many misfortune showing that villains do exist.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Andrew Jackson A Good President

    441 Words  | 2 Pages

    Most people think he was cruel for creating the Indian removal act but he was only trying to expand america. Jackson’s plan was to move the Indians out so he can expand the U.S. border to the mississippi. Jackson even gave them their own to move to. Jackson said it would help the natives because it would separate them from white settlers. It would also make them free from the power of the state.

    Read More

  • The Trans-Mississippi West

    784 Words  | 4 Pages

    The government tried to force assimilation on Native Americans as well as an attempt to “kill the indian, save the man.” These ideas and policies are similar to those popular during the presidency of Andrew Jackson. Jackson developed a sense of ‘paternalism’ towards indians and believed he was saving them by forcing them to live out west of the Mississippi river away from white culture. The difference was that Jackson did not believe in assimilation of indians into white culture, he believed they should be kept separate. With the help of the Federal government removing indians from land west of the Mississippi, Americans were

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Andrew Jackson's Speech

    374 Words  | 2 Pages

    He achieved this by purposely neglecting the true horrors behind the removal of the Indians. Andrew Jackson portrayed the Native Americans as less than equal. The purpose of Jackson's speech was to justify his motives in moving the natives and to also convince congress that it was both beneficial to the Natives and the Americans. The source has value because it gives some insight into Jackson’s effort behind his motivation. Based on his purpose of speech, it can be learned that the relationship between the Natives and Americans was only beneficial for certain necessities.

    Read More

More about Jackson's Removal Dbq

Open Document