For instance, “San Francisco 49ers fans, and some pure NFL fans, will argue Joe Montana is the greatest of all-time over Brady regardless of what happens in Houston on Feb. 5” (source); This is another great example that shows Tom Brady does have some competition on who is actually the best. Even though, both articles are about Tom Brady, one source is comparing more about the quarterback and coach relationship, while the other source focuses deeper on the quarterback
81% of all revenue generated comes from television and marketing rights. In order to have people watch the games that are televised, these players have to give the audience a reason to watch. Now this brings back the point of doing the work but not reaping the reward. The NCAA has a 14 year contract with CBS to televise all NCAA tournament games. This contract is worth $10.8 billion (“Revenue”).
If residents of the greater GR area want to go see a college football game they are forced to go to see Grand Valley play. This allows for the athletic department to set season ticket prices above marginal cost in order to generate revenue from fans attending the game. However, there are
Also he is a reporter for CBS sports , which puts out stories for all sports and is a very popular sports broadcasting Inc. So he has written on subjects of this nature before. in “Why Not Let 18-Year-Olds Head Straight for the Pros”,The author Gerry Dinardo , addresses that he use to be a coach. And by him being a coach it changed the way he looked at both college and pro sports. He states that they have had ideas of starting a league for athletes 20 and older.
The NCAA should indeed pay their D1 athletes. Exploitation means treating someone unfairly to make money off of them. The NCAA is a business that gets away with exploiting athletes for billions of dollars. The National College Athletic Association makes money because there is a low supply for college level athletes, yet a great demand to see these athletes perform. So the NCAA, in a way monopolized the scant amount of college level athletes.
College football players deserve some type of income. Colleges generate billions off of players, therefore it should not hurt to compensate student athletes, furthermore, these players are risking their health and well-being without receiving a penny in return, and lastly, getting paid to play can teach these young student athletes financial responsibility. To begin with, colleges generate billions off of players, therefore, it should not hurt to indemnify their student athletes. Paying each athlete even at minimum wage is better than nothing, in addition, it would not even make a dent in the billions the colleges produce because of the players. All jersey sales, ticket sales, television revenue, and basically all outlets of income get dispersed to the coaches, the staff, the schools, the NCAA and any and everyone involved
College athletes deserve to be paid because they are the only ones not being paid in the college sports industry. The National Collegiate Athletic Association (NCAA) generates eleven billion dollars annually, some of which could, and should go to college athletes. “USA Today reported last year just how much money the top 10 coaches in college football made. Nick Saban from Alabama topped the list earning roughly $5.5 million in 2013 alone” (Seibold). The coaches are making millions of dollars and the players aren’t.
Lastly, Alessandro Portelli’s They Say in Harlan County supports my argument in terms of rivalries. In Harlan County, Lynch football and basketball were known to be the best. The football team and basketball team had higher status than others and were glorified in the communities. Even during early development in this Appalachian county, rivalry was always a topic of discussion. “We can’t get over basketball rivalries, or ‘the people in Harlan are snoots and the people in Evarts, look down their nose at us,’,” Daniel Howard said while explaining his experiences with sport rivalries.
Winning multiple conference titles in the past couple of years should have shown to the president that he needs to upgrade our facilities. Multiple upgrades could be made for every sport. Football should be given a much larger stadium now that they have won conference and beat Coastal Carolina who will be moving up to the Sun Belt Conference. When I say larger stadium I refer to the seating the field itself is very nice but there is hardly any seating and when you go to the games its very crowded. Another thing is our band and you may be asking yourself how does that affect our football well when it is half-time people want a show and our band is at times very plain and they should be given proper band uniforms not just polos and kakis.
The NFL is portrayed in the media show that the NFL players in their uniforms and portray them to be very happy and wealthy and enjoying their lives. The media also shows how NFL players get all the girls and show their high profile divorces or their criminal cases. The NFL shows young prospective player that in order to be a part of their league they must be the best of the best or go home. What that says about the NFL is that they are very competitive and it is not an easy journey to try to be a part of their team. The message it conveys to people is that if you get buff and you throw around a football you can be just like the NFL players and have all the money, cars and women.
Watkins describes the way one student-athlete feels by saying, “I 'll sign all your footballs for 9.95. / The cheerleaders and honeys all treat me real nice. / My coach calls me “The Messiah”, / just like Jesus Christ My head may be swollen, / like a big blimp” (Watkins). Paying colligate athletes would just add to this problem even more, but the reality is these athletes are already receiving great amounts of money from their higher education institutions. The truth is paying college athletes would just escalate problems even more and would cause an increase in their will to perform even better.
Should college athletes be paid? I selected this article because I honestly thought they did get paid and I wanted to read more on the topic.In this essay we will discuss the pros and cons of college athletes getting paid.I am on the pro side of this debate. Here is why. Here are the pros of paying college athletes; from the text; “Big time college football and basketball programs generate billions of dollars a year in TV and marketing contracts, ticket sales, and merchandising.” So, the athletes should be paid because the programs fabricate brobdingnagian amounts of money and they do not even pay the people who are actually the crux of the money making process.From the text; “There’s an issue of fairness,” and “The question that’s being raised here is . .
If you haven’t read Monday Morning Quarterback’s profile on Paul’s hiring, I recommend you do so now. The first thing that should be mentioned is that not only does Paul carry a storied football career that took him to Harvard as a wide receiver, he also thrives on challenges. He is a thinker that wants to challenge himself to improve, and in doing so, improve those around
he American university system has presented elite athletes with a rare opportunity. Only in the states can an individual compete at a publicized level while obtaining a college degree (“Mark Emmert”). Such combination of a commercialized business and an educational institute alludes to the debate on student athlete’s wages. However, the opposing side rises above on study-ridden research. Facts can conclude that college athletes should not be paid.
It is unjust to coerce people into performing a service without a reasonable compensation. If we simply said that the mere fact that people consent to coercive contracts makes them just, it would be impossible to prevent any exploitation. Cork Gaines of Business Insider 14 Oct. 2016 elaborates on the fact that College Sports Bring in Billions of Dollars, he states “We recently took a look at the schools that make the most money off of college athletics, with Texas A&M topping the list with $192.6 million in revenue,” and “The 231 NCAA Division I schools with data available generated a total of $9.15 billion in revenue during the 2015 fiscal year.” and Greg Johnson of The Nation, 29 Jun. 2015 makes a great point we he states that the NCAA Should run like the free market, he explains “ They should simply be allowed to operate within the free market like anyone else in America. Schools can pay what they want, and athletes should be able to sign endorsements for their own likeness and image.