The purpose of this report is for me to analyze these 3 case studies of Douglas’ recent actions and to decide if they are grounds for hesitation in knighting this governor, James Douglas. My stance on this matter, after consideration, is that these incidents bring up several concerns, and I do not believe we should move forward and knight the man. Firstly, James Douglas has done a lot of good for a many people in his various positions of power. While investigating the murder of Peter Brown, he successfully restrained all the men from injuring or killing anyone, and, due to the Cowichan people being the “most numerous and warlike of the Native Tribes in Vancouver’s Island”, referred to this exchange as an “epoch in the history of our Indian …show more content…
The hanging of Tathlasut was an extreme, and could be considered a misstep, as Thomas Williams was only shot and didn’t die. This made the hanging unheard of, severe and out of practice in the way of the Crown, because a death penalty was never used “unless life had actually be taken”. Though Douglas often believed that he was doing very peaceful and non-threatening negotiations, the people he dealt with didn’t always agree that this was clearly conveyed. “The threat of total annihilation backed by an incredible array of fire-power achieved Douglas’ aim.” The treaties he earlier created are often scrutinized as they offer very little compensation on the Native’s side of the deal. Blankets in exchange of the loss of their right of land forever doesn’t seem very fair. This kind of thing (in addition to the enormous influx of immigrants who began to take gold and other resources), was likely the main source of the Native’s anger and what provoked situations like the murder of Peter Brown and the shooting of Thomas Williams. Overall, I believe that Douglas falls shy of being a man worthy of becoming a knight. His leadership skills did often prove to be successful and he did learn from his own and other’s mistakes. The intentions of most of his actions were often pure and good-hearted, but he would typically take the route that most benefited himself. Douglas will surely be remembered in history, but I don’t believe he needs
On October 9, 1806, Joseph Bird Joquips, a 70 year old Native Indian from the Mohegan Tribe, petitioned the State of Connecticut General Assembly for a portion of the land in Connecticut that was divided among Natives in the Mohegan tribe. He emphasized his devout military career that began in 1758 during the Seven Years’ War to convince members of the General Assembly to allot him a portion of land that belonged to the Mohegan Indians. While Joquips had already rightfully possessed a piece of the land because he had lived on it prior to European presence, the Europeans did not recognize his authority to the land; and thus, forcibly seized control of Native lands so that they could distribute it as they saw fit. It was not important for Joquips to possess a piece of land, but to have the Europeans recognize that the land belong to him. Thus, this petition represented Joquips manipulation of the European system to secure a piece of his tribe’s land with hopes to collect the land for the Mohegan tribe piece by piece.
September 20th on the CBC News website a story published titled “Dudley George's brother in serious condition after being accidentally set on fire”. This story explains a celebratory walk done by Kettle Point First Nations that took a turn when a group called Stony Point set a protest fire in front of a military camp that was just agreed by the Ottawa government to be returned to the First Nations. The fire was set to show that not all band members where in support of the agreement that was made. Perry Neil Watson George was caught on fire and is now suffering from second degree burns. The story also mentions Dudley George, Perry's brother who was shot in a protest in 1995, and the accusations made by the Stony Point people that there chief is buying votes.
Lord Durham was a man with liberal beliefs who was sent to Canada to study the affairs of British North America. He was given the task of writing a report, which would give suggestions on how to solve the problems Britain was facing with its colony. His report shook the systems already in place and changed Canada forever. To some he is a hero, but to others he is very much disliked. Nonetheless, Lord Durham’s report directly led to the colonies of Upper and Lower Canada being united.
Frederick Douglass ( Frederick Augustus Washington Bailey ) was born February 1818 in Talbot County, Maryland. Died February 20, 1895 at the age of 77 in Washington, D.C. Douglass occupation 's were Abolitionist, Suffragist, Author, Editor, Diplomat. Frederick lived in the nineteenth century. Douglass was married to two women named Anna Murray-Douglass in 1838 but she died in 1882 so he married Helen Pitts in 1884.Douglass had escaped from slavery, and became a leader of the abolitionist movement. He was interested in antislavery writings.
Essay Outline The human race that inhabited the lands earlier than anyone else, Aboriginals in Canada had conquered many obstacles which got them to what they are today. In the past, Canadian Aboriginals have dealt with many gruesome issues that primarily involved the Canadians opposing them or treating them like ‘‘wards.’’ The Indian Act is a written law which controls the Indian’s lives and it is often amended several times to make Indian lives either peaceful or cruel but especially, cruel. Aboriginals found the Indian Act a massive problem in their lives due to it completely controlling them and how they lived on their reserve.
The Known World, a fictional historical novel by Edward P. Jones, and Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, an American Slave, an autobiography written by it titular Frederick Douglass, are both texts that portray life on a plantation in the 19th century, during the age of slavery in the United States. They have some similarities as a result of the setting. However, both works were created with different purposes in mind, resulting in many differences between the two. As an autobiography, Frederick Douglass’s piece is much more personal and thus more subjective than that of Jones’s. Douglass describes many details with strong adjectives.
People rebel when no justice being served. It is understandable why people act a certain way. Have you ever loved someone more than yourself? A person is your biggest pride and joy to be safe? Can you imagine how it feels to no longer have your pride and joy with in a split second, due to the way they look?
This was the case in Douglas’s Narrative, where he tells of a story of a man who ran off while being whipped, and after the overseer found him, he was shot in the head after repetitious command were not met. Harsh treatments such as these, fueled the abolitionist movement in the years to come. However, the slaves who couldn't wait for the law to be on their side, took matters into their own hand. Forms of extreme resistance took place throughout slavery involving planned revolts, arson on loaded barns, beaten death of overseers, to suicide of the slaves, who would rather die than endure another day as a slave. Many of the revolts were documented, and a notable one was led by Gabriel Prosser of Virginia.
Many other thing like treaty not falling throw by Captain George McClellan….Although many thing had been proclaim against Chief Kamiakin within newspaper and rumor he was till the same man forgiving, with principle and well displayed an honesty not often found, and he still have a belief that there are good men out
Chris McCandless was in his early 20’s, he was the kind of that guy that wanted to learn and experience life without all of the material things. He wanted to be independent from his parents and friends so Chris did something that would be insane for most of us humans but to him, it wasn’t. He went into the wild of Alaska for months, in fact, McCandless even thought he could make it out alive at the end of his journey. As a matter of fact, he was known as being a risk taker and enjoyed being out and about in the nature side of the world. Many would believe that Chris McCandless went into the wild to purposely kill himself; however, I myself believe that McCandless did not do it purposely.
Here is what ill say.. He had his positive qualities though listing them would be easier than remembering
After watching Tecumseh’s Vision, I became more knowledgeable about the struggles Natives had to experience as western civilization occurred. Tecumseh was a trailblazer to his people and was a visionary. He was in favor of a strong Indian confederacy and was a strong Indian leader. As a result of rising tensions between the Shawnees and the Americans, it lead to a costly culmination of battles in order to claim Ohio land and westward expansion. Tecumseh’s legacy lives on and he is remembered for his leadership and courage to take on the Americans.
Institutional and historical analysis often portray the motives of governments, especially in the cases of Quebec separatism and Aboriginal mistreatment. History describes attempts at compromise to rectify the problems by altering political institutions to provide more autonomy to the provinces, witness in various accords and the methods described previously. However, in regards to Aboriginals a historical relationship of exploitation and eradication sheds on the systemic issues that Aboriginals cope with and the institutions that caused them. As scholars of Canadian politics, it is important to consider historical and institutional analyses when looking at any issue, as it reveals the underlying motives of actors in regards to the cleavages that comprise a state.
4)Robert J. Sharpe, Patricia I. McMahon Persons Case: The Origins and Legacy of the Fight for Legal Personhood. Toronto: Univ of Toronto Press, 2007, 1-206 5) Michael Dorland and Maurice René. Charland, Law, rhetoric and irony in the formation of Canadian civil culture (Toronto: University of Toronto Press, 2002), 218. 6) Vivien Hughes.
The European people were after the land of First Nations people and in return offered fishing and hunting rights, education and much more. The treaties were a means of obtaining more land in the governments favor from the First Nations. “In instructing the first Treaty Commissioner Weymss Simpson, Joseph Howe noted that “It should therefore be your endeavor to secure the cession of the lands upon terms as favorable as possible to the government,