ipl-logo

James Harrington's, Commonwealth Of Oceana, And The Spirit Of Laws

1811 Words8 Pages

For the purpose of this paper, I will explore how James Harrington’s, Commonwealth of Oceana, and Montesquieu’s, The Spirit of Laws, are primarily irreconcilable with Locke’s understanding of property as it relates to the purpose of liberty in a republican form of government. I will contend that Harrington and Montesquieu's ideas on sumptuary tax and land reform will provide a republic with a fuller sense of stability, at the cost of liberty, than Locke’s understanding of property as the basis and purpose of government as represented by his work in Second Treatise on Civil Government. First, I will examine how Montesquieu’s adoption of sumptuary laws primarily inhibit a republic's individual's basic natural liberty by limiting their freedom to obtain what the citizens choose. Secondly, I will prove Harrington’s land reform and Montesquieu’s inheritance tax provide a …show more content…

Finally, I will argue against Montesquieu’s limitations on inheritance and propose a progressive tax instead. In total, I will prove that Locke’s understanding of government provides a fuller picture of liberty within a republic because of the inalienable rights guaranteed within a republic and his views on private ownership of land.
Montesquieu's notion that a republic is more perfect when sumptuary laws limit luxury directly minimizes a citizen's liberty within a republic to express their wants and desires within the law. I contend that Montesquieu is correct in assuming that a republic will be more perfect when instituting sumptuary laws and limiting luxuries citizens can enjoy because in doing so government authority and control over society is increased leading to greater internal stability. Montesquieu says, “In order to have this

Show More
Related

  • Colonial Government Vs American Government

    491 Words  | 2 Pages

    Common Sense seeks to answer the question: Is the form of colonial government ruling America the most effective option, in that it provides security and protects the people from anarchy and their vices at the least expense? Paine 's thesis is that the English system of government is undesirable as it does more harm than good to the society that it governs, and therefore a true republic should replace the English constitutional monarchy. This conclusion is supported by the points that government is a necessary evil to ensure security, the English constitution is redundant and archaic, and monarchies are destructive human constructs. To begin, Common Sense argues that government is intended to protect society from anarchy and hardship. Nevertheless, the government only fills this role logically as long as the

    Read More

  • How Did John Locke Contribute To The Formation Of The Constitution

    834 Words  | 4 Pages

    His view is that the limited government should secure life, liberty and estate. Which is almost identical to the phrase in The Declaration of Independence which states “life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness”. Thomas Jefferson got this phrase from John Locke because Locke connects property with happiness. With both phrases being something that no person or government can take away from an individual. As for Montesquieu, in his writing he differentiates the different types of government and the pros and cons of them.

    Read More

  • John Locke Dbq

    697 Words  | 3 Pages

    After already obtaining an uneven distribution of wealth in the nation among the three estates, the debt from the American Revolution took a toll on France’s financial stability, practically bankrupting them. Struggling from the large gap between the wealthy and the poor, it was suggested by Sieyes that the third estate, commoners (97%), were the people who made up the nation of France and that they needed to take a stand, which they did. The third estate followed Rosseau, who’s ideas were developed from Locke, on his ideas of “general will” of the nation, and that they should form a national assembly of their own since they were the nation (SMW 76). The French Revolution unfolded into three phases of constitutional monarchy, radical republicanism, and military consolidation, resulting in the issue of the Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen, among other accomplishments. Also following the American Revolution, and the Declaration of Independence, the French used Locke’s ideas in his Second Treatise of Government as a guideline to their new constitution.

    Read More

  • Declaration Of Independence Vs Constitution Essay

    474 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout this paper, this material will be further explained and examined through several different ideas and articles. The first idea that will be discussed, regarding the principles presented above, can be demonstrated through the article, The Right of “Free Suffrage” (1776). This article

    Read More

  • What Is The Third Estate Analysis

    593 Words  | 3 Pages

    Emmanuel Joseph Sieyès talks about in his famous pamphlet, What Is the Third Estate, relates to common people. During history, we talked about how the people serve the king based on God’s authority. However, it limits people from speaking out on their individual issues or needs. What Sieyès suggests is that without the nobility or the citizens, they cannot function. It takes both the nobility and citizens to create the foundation for their “new” government.

    Read More

  • Jean Domat's Social Order And Absolute Monarchy

    1340 Words  | 6 Pages

    HIST 3005 Contreras 1 Luis Contreras Sophie Tunney 12/3/2018 The Needs of the people When a form of governing a state becomes obsolete it is sometimes best to do away with that form of governance and install a new form of government. In our “Shaping Of The Modern World” textbook we can find the source “Common sense” by Thomas Paine explaining how ineffective England’s rule over the colonies is, and we can also find “Social Order And Absolute Monarchy” by Jean Domat which argues in favor of absolute rule by the monarchy. Domat’s idea of absolute monarchy is flawed however because when a monarchy is in power it limits the growth of the state, stomp on the natural rights of its citizen’s, their decisions will affect their people

    Read More

  • Constitutional Convention Research Paper

    809 Words  | 4 Pages

    Montesquieu's ideas is represented by what we now know as checks and balances. Not only did John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu influenced- the United States Constitution, but Voltaire did as well. Voltaire had a concept of separating religion from government.

    Read More

  • The Failed Enlightenment

    798 Words  | 4 Pages

    Montesquieu was a french philosopher who believed that the best way to preserve liberty was to separate power within government. He believed that government should be separated into three different branches; Legislative, executive, and judicial (Aguilera, “Enlightened Thinkers Lecture”). This systems of checks and balances is similar to the system within the united states. Montesquieu was firmly against any one small group having too much power. Toussaint’s decision completely went against these ideals which showcases how he was not thinking in enlightened terms when decided the governing fate of

    Read More

  • Locke Vs Tocqueville Analysis

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Introduction: While freedom as a concept feels fairly intuitive, nuances in interpretation can change the basis of an argument. John Locke’s Second Treatise of Government and Alexis de Tocqueville’s Democracy in America do not define liberty in precisely the same way, which in turn guides two different visions in how a government should function. When examining a core concept in an argument, it is important to inquire to whether its treatment is adequate. Is either definition of liberty sufficient, and does either author’s envisioned government adequately address liberty in that system? This paper will argue that Locke’s definition of liberty remains in the literal sphere while Tocqueville’s is more conceptual, but neither Locke’s nor Tocqueville’s

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast The Glorious Revolution Of 1688 And The Enlightenment

    1102 Words  | 5 Pages

    This sharing of power added ideas from the newly formed government that focused on the freedoms of citizens in England. Voltaire contended that the English government had successfully limited the power of the monarchy by affirming the power of the nobility, criticizing the French feudal system for its inability to share political power amongst the citizens of France (6). Advocating a limited monarchy to hold political discussions concerning the progress of the French government towards liberal reforms during the French Revolution. Voltaire as an enlightened philosophe, published papers about the rationality of the French government, which influenced his attitude towards the English constitutional monarchy that implemented the enlightened ideal of liberty. John Locke wrote that the purpose of electing legislative powers was to create laws and rules that protected the “properties of all the members of society,” a natural right of mankind (5).

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast John Locke And Montesquieu

    1227 Words  | 5 Pages

    John Locke and Baron de Montesquieu were political philosophers that debated the question of who was best fit to control the government. Locke and Montesquieu shared similar political beliefs such as natural rights and the separation of government powers. However, both philosophers did, in fact, have their personal views that helped them accomplish important achievements. John Locke published “Two Treatises of Government” and “ An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,” which present a detail philosophy of the mind and thought. Locke’s “An Essay Concerning Human Understanding,” lays out his philosophical project.

    Read More

  • How Did John Locke Contribute To The Enlightenment

    471 Words  | 2 Pages

    Montesquieu’s ideas on government were eventually adopted and highly included during the development of the American government. Since Montesquieu’s ideas influenced so much during his time period he became a very influential Enlightenment

    Read More

  • How Did Rousseau Influence The French Revolution

    810 Words  | 4 Pages

    During the Estates General, Louis XIV believes he can rid the Third Estate’s demands by locking them out. The Third Estate moves next door to a tennis court and takes an oath to remain there until there is a constitutional monarchy, a form of government promulgated by Montesquieu in his “Spirit of Laws”. “Montesquieu claimed that a liberal constitutional monarchy was the best system of government for a people who prized freedom, on the grounds that by dividing the sovereignty of the nation between several centres of power, it provided a permanent check on any one of them becoming despotic.” Montesquieu is clearly vital in the French Revolution as he sets the structure of government which the National Assembly demands and provides the governmental goal of

    Read More

  • Thomas Hobbes Absolute Monarchy

    1084 Words  | 5 Pages

    Thomas Hobbes proposed that the ideal government should be an absolute monarchy as a direct result of experiencing the English Civil War, in which there was internal conflict between the parliamentarians and the royalists. Hobbes made this claim under the assumption that an absolute monarchy would produce consistent policies, reduce conflicts and lower the risk of civil wars due to the singular nature of this ruling system. On another hand, John Locke counters this proposal with the view that absolute monarchies are not legitimate as they are inconsistent with the state of nature. These two diametrically opposed views stem from Hobbes’ and Locke’s different understandings of human nature, namely with regard to power relationships, punishment, and equality in the state of nature. Hobbes’ belief that human beings are selfish and appetitive is antithetical with Locke’s contention that human beings are intrinsically moral even in the state of nature, which results in Locke’s strong disagreement with Hobbes’ proposed absolute monarchy.

    Read More

  • Aristotle's Citizenship

    1750 Words  | 7 Pages

    Moreover, as much as the acquisition of wealth for its own right is in opposition to what constitutes virtue in the Aristotelian society (Politics), this capitalist ideal is found present in the definition of the Lockean good life. Due to the fact that citizenship is the duty to be watchful of the government, and freedom is one of non-interference in the pursuit of a private life, the good life then is adherence to these ideals. Freedom and thus human flourishing, then, are obtained when the individual adheres to the nature of law in regards to being mindful of consumption, whilst securing their own property through the combination of their labor with the land. Under the common wealth they have agreed to, property will be secure. The individual is free to flourish and secure property.

    Read More

More about James Harrington's, Commonwealth Of Oceana, And The Spirit Of Laws

Open Document