The United States wanted to establish its own nation, remaining a colony of themselves. The fifth President of United States, James Monroe, delivered a speech on opposing further colonization of the North and South America. His words allowed United States officially adopt isolationism with minor variation of outer influence. Monroe was successful in presenting his purpose through defensive tone, argumentative diction, imagery, and his use of logos to support his arguments. Monroe develops the atmosphere of a ‘defensive’ emotion through his use of tone. The rhetoric justifies the action of America logically because he presents his arguments on real events occurred. He is not asking the audience, but he is telling of what he is trying to do. “In the War between those new governments and Spain we have declared our neutrality at the time of their recognition, and to this we have adhered and shall continue to …show more content…
If there are attempts to colonize, threats will follow no matter what. For example, “It is only when our rights are invaded or seriously menaced that we resent injuries or make preparation for our defence”. In this statement, he gives reasons of the causation of war -that war will never take place if there is no invasion of rights. In such way that convinces the European countries to remain in their own positions. In addition, Monroe applied argumentative diction repetitively, in order to develop a conservative atmosphere. For instance, “We owe it, therefore, to candor and to the amicable relations..” The usage of diction such as ‘candor’ and ‘amicable’ guides the speech in honesty, to enhance and support the main argument -that the US would not interfere internal affairs between European powers. He declares the policy over and over again to restate his argument on unification of the people on banning the
American diplomacy was everything during the Napoleonic wars. While students of history are sometimes distracted solely by the implications of the War of 1812, British and American hostile interactions were not all that was going on at the time. In fact, at the time, the United States was heavily involved with France, and as Peter Hill states in his book Napoleon’s Troublesome Americans “came within two votes of declaring war on Napoleon Bonaparte’s French empire” shortly before 1812. In his book, Hill sheds light on the impact diplomacy had on the unfolding of events during the period of 1804-1815.
It came as no surprise to the current politicians at the March 23, 1775 Second Virginia Convention in Richmond that Patrick Henry’s purpose was to convince them of the necessity for revolution and war leading to their secession from England. At the time, the orthodox perception of Henry was not positive. Patrick Henry was considered to be quite the extremist, and this bias is a major stymie in the ethos and respectability of his speech to his fellow politicians. To overcome this bias, Patrick Henry persuasively conveys his ideas through a careful manipulation of rhetorical devices appealing to pathos and logos throughout a meticulous and intensifying organization of opinions and ideas. The most foundational of these is undeniably the organizational
Well-known orator and attorney, Patrick Henry, in his speech, “Speech in the Virginia Convention” (1775), asserts that Americans must fight for their independence against Britain. Henry’s purpose is to take a stand against the British government. He adopts an acrimonious tone in order to call influential Virginian landowners to action and persuade them to advocate the revolution. Henry appeals to emotions through the use of syntax in order to emphasize the British government’s refusal to acquiesce with the colonists’ requests. For instance, Henry begins his speech by asking if Great Britain has an “enemy, in this quarter of the world, to call for all this accumulation of navies and armies” not to receive an answer, but to indicate that the
The United States promised to stay out of European business and told the Europeans to stay out its as well. European countries that interfere in America taken as acts of aggression. The Monroe Doctrine was propounded by President James Monroe in 1823. Monroe proposed that the US would oppose further colonization of North and South America by European powers but would not interfere in the affairs of existing
This egoistic mind of the US was another reason why the US was unjustified to go to war with Mexico. Polk should not have made decisions with the weak belief of “manifest destiny” which,
The Rhetorical Strategy of a Powerful Argument Patrick Henry’s “Speech of the Virginia Convention” had many interesting rhetorical strategies. The ones that were most notable was diction, logs appeal, allusion, and imagery. The “Speech of the Virginia Convention” was a strong argument to convince the patriots, loyalist, and the colonist for freedom. Patrick Henry only wanted the best for his fellow americans and for him. His “Speech of the Virginia Convention” led the argument to war with the british.
The rhetorical devices used in James Madison and the Making of America is logos. What makes Gutzman’s point convincing is the language he uses, including questions, to prove that without Madison’s immense involvement in politics, America would be completely different. “Madison had devoted considerable effort in the last years of his life to the task of preparing his papers for publication. Among them were extensive voluminous and historically invaluable correspondence, and, most significantly of all, the most complete record of the Philadelphia Convention.” (Gutzman 361).
The party wants nothing to do with the war and will not participate in it. But only for self defense. But because of this, they wanted to defend the Monroe Doctrine (Doc E). From defending the Monroe Doctrine, Cuba decided to lead a conference to change it up. This conference was held by a Cuban leader named, Cosa Nostra.
The Monroe Doctrine was a speech given in 1823 by James Monroe, the 5th president of the United States, to the U.S. Congress concerning European presence in the Western Hemisphere. Monroe was becoming continuously concerned about European influence in the region. While the primary audience for this message was Congress, the intended audience was all European powers, including Russia, and Latin America. The events in Latin America before and after the Spanish-American War will be used as an example of the imperial reach by the U.S. The United States, ironically, became an imperial power through its mission outlined in the Monroe Doctrine to end European colonialism and imperialism.
1798 was a time in American when foreigners were a big topic of debate. In that year the Alien and Sedition Act was passed, prohibiting any kind of malicious or disreputable writings from foreigners that went against the government. Because of this, many credible politicians took action to give their views and opinions on the matter. Two of the politicians were Timothy Pickering and James Madison. Both not only having two different views on the act, but also, having two varying rhetorical strategies.
After reading the entirety of the assignment in detail, the influences of Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr. and William James has further illuminated the context of which Pragmatism was created. Oliver Wendell Holmes Jr., a fascinating and complex character, suffered a great deal of tragedies during his service in the American Civil War. The accumulation of his experiences during the war led him away from several aspects of his worldview prior to. Furthermore, William James’ worldview was influenced heavily by his father, Henry James, Sr.; a man who possessed unorthodox views of the world and personal traits. In order to further depict how Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr.’s experiences in the war and William James’ experiences with his father, Henry James,
Monroe then began speaking about protecting the nation from outside forces, saying that if we did not prepare for invasion, if and when it happened, the nation would be destroyed and the people’s
In "The Gettysburg Address," Abraham Lincoln brings his point across of dedicating the cemetery at Gettysburg by using repetition, antithesis, and parallelism. Abraham Lincoln uses repetition in his speech to bring a point across and to grab the audience attention. For example, President Lincoln states, "We can not dedicate--we can not consecrate-- we can not hallow-- this ground." Abraham Lincoln is saying the Gettysburg cannot be a holy land since the ones that fought there will still be remembered, and Lincoln is assuming that the dead and brave that fought would still want Gettysburg to improve on more.
In the years leading up to the American Revolution, there was a tense relationship between the colonists and their British rulers. Large gatherings in the colonies to discuss the grievances caused by the actions of the British were common. Patrick Henry applies the rhetorical strategies of allusions and repetition in his “Speech in the Virginia Convention” to assert that the colonists should believe fighting for their freedom and rights is necessary and that they must fight as soon as possible. Although Henry has rather radical beliefs in comparison to the other members of the Convention, he connects with them through religious and literary allusions that are able to convince them of his assertions. In his speech, Henry alludes to
One major tenant of the “system of peace” described by Stella Ghervas was the suppression of internal dissent and the maintenance of law and order from revolution in collaboration with all major European states. This idea is best expressed in the Troppau Protocol, which stated that “the powers bind themselves, by peaceful means, or if need be, by arms, to bring back the guilty state into the bosom of the Great Alliance.” However, despite attempts by the so-called “Congress system” to maintain the peace, in reality, these attempts always relied on the tactic approval of the British and must have fell within the scope of the preservation of the British-led balance of power. A prime example of this in action is the British reaction to the Latin American wars of independence. When the powers of the Holy Alliance sought to bring back the renegade Spanish colonies back under European control, the British refused to do so, with British foreign minister George Canning remarking that “Spanish America is free … and if we do not mismanage our affairs she is English”.