The financial, housing, social, clothing, diet and education situations of both of these social classes can be compared – they are complete opposites. “Peasants lived a life of working hard to get things, while nobles were given what they wanted.” [c] A peasant was not allowed to wear the colours/fabrics of what the nobles wore. If so, they would be either fined or put in jail. Nobles let the peasants do their farming work, whilst obtaining the jobs that can be considered “important”, such as judges, council workers. The noble’s houses are the complete opposite of peasants – they were large, and they did not have to share with farm animals.
They owed loyalty to the next class, the Daimyos. These were the feudal lords. Above them were the shogun and the emperor. The shogun was a military dictator who held more power than the emperor. The emperor only held symbolic power.
Imperial China was a superpower in the ancient world. China was governed by dynasties who gained power through warfare and maintained its superpower status through diplomacy. In China, governmental power was given to the emperor, who was thought to be chosen by the heavens, they were the top of the power hierarchy. Additionally, the emperor passed down power through their family. The chain of rulers from the same family came to be known as a dynasty and the history of imperial China is organized as so.
Feudalism was a key component of life for those in both Western Europe and Japan. The two systems developed independently from each other yet still held a multitude of similarities. However, their many differences out shadow the unique parallels they shared. The major discrepancies between the two are found in each’s code, structure and regulations. Documents nine and ten, break down the feudal structures of Western Europe and Japan.
Moreover, fascism had denied the democratic parliament system, and had only allowed the “elite” to rule over the country. This was similar to absolutism, as absolutism also only allows the “chosen” kings with divine rights to rule. Even though there are some similarities between fascism and absolutism, there are also differences. The main difference is the object of the authority. Absolutism gives all the power to the one and only monarch of the country.
The poem and movie of “Beowulf” are very different and they are also sort of similar. There are a lot more differences between the two than you would expect and while some of them are minor differences others are drastically different. Most movies are very different from the book they are made from. The biggest differences between the movie and poem were the three battles. The three battles have drastic differences.
The political institutions of the Byzantine Empire, and Western Europe had many similarities, as well as a number of differences. Western Europe prior to the fall the Byzantine Empire had a similar political system; however, as time transpired, Western Europe began to develop different political structures such as manorialism and feudalism. The Byzantine Empire, having remarkable similarities to China’s political systems, was deeply rooted in an one of history’s most elaborate bureaucracies. Both were eventually affected by the schism of 1054 between the East and the West, and conflicts between both sides had an influence on the political structures of both Western Europe, and the Byzantine Empire. Byzantine political patterns resembled the earlier Chinese system.
The Influence of Confucianism, Legalism, and Buddhism on Chinese Empires and Society The history of the ancient China is filled with explorations and reforms of the most suitable, effective, and adaptable state ideology for different empires and the society ruled. Up till Tang dynasty, since the early emperors themselves had little idea what would be ideal and what would not, different ideologies were endorsed in a much experimental way, among which three major ideologies played important roles in shaping the Chinese empires that advocated them and affecting the values and behaviors of the society under the rule of these empires. These three ideologies are Legalism, Confucianism, and Buddhism, and were adopted by Qin, Han, and Tang dynasty
In the Medieval time period, there were different classes that played different roles in the society. The upper class, and the lower class are the classes that differ the most in this time period. The upper class were often viewed as nobles, and the lower class were commonly viewed as peasants, serfs, or commoners. The ways of life and the roles of these two societal classes were also drastically different. Although these two classes are very different, they are both vital to the society.
The North and South emerged as two distinct regions because they had various differences. These differences included the geography, the economy, slavery, and transportation. The North was built mainly on factories and trade and opposed slavery, while the South’s foundation was agriculture and slavery. The geography of the South was more rural than the North and the North had more means of transportation than the South. These drastic characteristics created a vast divide between the two regions.
The feudal system, also known as feudalism, was an assertive legal and social system that helped established the political, social, and economic state in Japan and Western Europe. It was applied with divergent interpretations in these two regions. This particular system did affect political life and institutions in both Japan and Western Europe. Despite the conflicts it caused, feudalism helped preserve law and order, and succeeding at industrial development in both Western Europe and Japan. Although these two civilizations acquired the same structure, each one took on their own approach.
Consequently, it can be implied that did not have a very large impact on their will to fight in the Civil War. Farmers were the next class of people, they owned small patches of land, never large enough to be a plantation. These farmers supported at most one slave who were usually treated more as workers than property. Finally, the large plantation owners were the final class of the South, they were able to own hundreds of slaves and some would treat them harshly. In spite of this, these people made up a very tiny portion of the population.