We are living in internationalized world, global trade keeps increasing and more companies from many countries around the world are going national at an astounding rate. This is reflection of strong economic growth around the world and globalization of the economy and corporations. Offcies are spread from one continent to another and travel is essential to business. This is the reason why “business travel is increasing,” states Hubert Joly, president and chief executive officer of CWT.
Nowadays in business world, you might well find yourself as an international manager in a foreign subsidiary of an American firm, facing on a daily basis all aspects of international management, or could travel to country such like Japan, negotiating export sales
…show more content…
This Japanese negotiation process is often perceived as dishonest negotiating by American, who put all the information on the table and expect negotiations to be straightforward (Graham and Sano). In addition, the Japanese put more weight on their trust of the other party rather than on the information on the table. This misapprehension can be explained by priority differences on making an agreement between the two cultures. While American negotiate issues point by point and reach an overall agreement, the Japanese make an overall agreement first, then get into details (March). When complications occur during a negotiation process, reactions of American and Japanese show a sharp contrast. March (168) summarizes their reaction differences as …show more content…
This is because the United States and Japan have different cultures, languages, and negotiation styles. Although Japan is a Western industrialized nation, it is a country where people still maintain strong traditional beliefs that have been embedded in Japan for centuries. These include the traditional concepts of order, hierarchy, seniority, and social harmony, which in turn have formed the unique Japanese negotiation styles of step-by-step negotiation and consensus decision-making or the ringi system. With the expansion of Japanese business activities into the international arena, however, Japanese negotiators may adjust their tactics to achieve their objectives. While Japan and the United States are sure to develop their economic relationship further, the gaps and differences in culture, language, and negotiation style can be narrowed or bridged if negotiators actively seek to recognize, understand, and tolerate these differences. By being aware of each other's differences, the parties will be able to negotiate fair agreements and find workable
Honest and constructive conflicts or differences show that everybody is committed to a good
Foreign language and technology teachers were hired by the Bakfu and Han long before Perry’s expedition, which gave the Japanese basic understandings of the Western world. As Japan was notorious for its strict seclusion policy, Commodore Perry was met by surprise by the fact that Japan had been exposed to the West beyond expectation (Jones). As a result, Japan was more diplomatically strategic and cautious when negotiating with the United States, knowing the dire consequences they could face through any blunders. Additionally, much of those who received education from these Western teachers were of the Samurai class, the principle negotiators with the United States (Jones). Because these people were the most knowledgeable about the West conducted the negotiations, they could make the most educated moves during discussions, effectively making the most out of the treaty.
The United States did try to negotiate peace with Japan to stop an inevitable war, but the deal that was given to Japan was made in such a way that Japan would not accept it. Japan was not going to step down immediately and pull out all of their troops in foreign nations that they just spent years trying to achieve. Another option in Hull Note was war. This negotiation was meant to force war between America and Japan, but it did not give the choice to America it gave it to Japan. Japan was not going to give up their pride and give up to the Americans without a fight.
When two people are involved in a dispute the scope is way less then when two countries are disagreeing. A major necessity is that both parties have to be willing to sit down and want to talk things out. Some keys
There was a lot of discussion as to what they were going to do in order to make things clearer for each of
Products can now be distributed around the world in an extremely efficient time. People can also travel easier and cheaper. “In 1974, it cost $1,442 (in 2011 dollars) to fly from New York to Los Angeles; today it can be done for less than $300” (Document 2). Globalization has connected the world ideologically, and economically, and caused great exchange in networks through the ways of agreeing among each other. We have seen an increase in the accessibility of products from the efficient system of work spread throughout the
Brad and McKenzie (2010. P.129).This approach not only provides the opportunity for the frontline staff, service providers, supervisors, program managers, the senior policy-makers and, possibly, competent service users, the opportunity to make policy together, it also provides an avenue for both sides of the spectrum to learn from each other. As Brad and Makenzie put it succinctly,” “shared decision making results in shared learning” Brad and McKenzie (2010.
It is in observing how people deal with and react to conflicts that we see clear differences between cultures. Some cultures view conflict as a positive thing, while others view it as something to be avoided. In the United States, conflict is not usually desirable; nonetheless, conventional wisdom in this country encourages individuals to deal directly with conflicts when they do arise. In fact, face-to-face encounters are usually suggested as the way to work through whatever problems exist. By contrast, in many Asian countries, open conflict is experienced as embarrassing or demeaning.
As described earlier in the introduction part, I have recalled different courses of negotiation in my life from which I have tried to figure out my weaknesses and strengths. Before the negotiation course, I could only realize some of my capacity and limits, for example I might be good at emotional control and bad at active listening. I believed they were not all the weaknesses and strengths that I should realize. In addition, I found it hard to hone my strengths and improve my weaknesses because (i) I did not see negotiation in systematic viewpoint (ii) I have not had enough negotiation experiences. Thankfully, this course has shed the new light on the wide scope of negotiations and how they should be conducted.
The case “Alpha – Beta” is a very interesting case, which could be considered as one of my most favorable cases so far. What interested me was the fact that we had to act totally different from our conventional style. In fact, we were asked to behave collectively, formally, indirectly, patiently, unemotionally and passively. Although we could not make the deal, we all found this outcome understandable and predictable. What we learned from the exercise was to be aware of the existence of cross-cultural differences as well as how these differences affect our negotiation outcomes, then find out what should we do in the similar negotiation in our future.
The process of globalization has a major effect in the changing world. Globalization have two main drivers which is economic institution and information technology. There is a rapid change in technology as well as knowledge therefore for organizations to be competitive in the global market they need to be familiar with new
In addition, flexibility can be important when it comes to communicating
The use of power based negotiation can foster mistrust and anger. The parties view each other as adversaries, and can withhold information that may hinder the negotiation. One of the major downsize of power based negotiations is that the parties may lose sight of the real issue. Personal Application As a
Take into account these differences between countries; you can expect that doing business and negotiation in Asia will take much longer than in the USA because Asian people tend to build a relationship first while Americans seek instant gratification and quick result (Roberts, The American Scholar, 2014). Scores of Vietnam was marked with an asterisk (*) which states that the research is not officially from Greert Hofstede but have been added through other research
Increasingly, businesses, consumers, and governments realize that their lives are affected not only by what goes on in their own town, state, or country but also by what is happening around the world. Consumers can walk into their local shops today and buy goods and services from all over the world. Local businesses must compete with these foreign products. However, many of these same businesses also have new opportunities to expand their markets by selling to a multitude of consumers in other countries. The advance of telecommunications is also rapidly reducing the cost of providing services internationally, while the Internet will assuredly change the nature of many products and services as it expands markets even further.