The United States Presidents were very much different in their decision-making styles. Some of them were completely rational in their decision making, based their decisions on pure analysis of information and facts, completely excluding their emotions, some of them were pure “gut players”, based their decisions solely on their emotions and “gut feelings”. When it comes to Franklin D. Roosevelt, he was completely different, another class – “altogether decision-maker” . Throughout his impressive 4 terms in the White House political career, he had to take hundreds of crucial political decisions, including those that led the country out of the Great Depression, and those that led the country through the World War II. There were a small number of
The Thomas Hobbes and Machiavelli ideas and perspectives helped to produced the custom or tradition of political realism. Both Thomas Hobbes and Machiavelli in their writing were tackling morality and self-interest from different views. Hobbes was a researcher, whose point was to put governmental issues onto an investigative balance; he as a result employed a strict coherent way to deal with his work. Interestingly, Machiavelli personality were mainly active; he worked, principally, as a common worker of the Florentine Republic. In this research I will explain the different ways, which they used and how the difference they made has made the comparative views of human nature.
The second type of political power struggle is around the persuasion, such as commerce, culture and education. The question about the political struggle should be addressed either by the political force or persuasion is always discussed by many scholars from different disciplines. This essay argues that the political power should be properly understood as a matter that involving both force and persuasion; the political power is composed of soft power and hard power. The essay attempt to explore the relationship between the force and persuasion in the political struggle from the perspective of international relation. In the first part, the essay will attempt to form a theoretical framework based on the theory of Machiavelli, and Locke; the essay will
2.1.1. The Social Responsibility theory is a variation on the Authoritarian and Libertarian theories. Its main concern is the reconciliation of the ideas about freedom and independence while still adhering to its responsibility towards society. Its proposal puts forward regulatory bodies such as ICASA (Independent Communications Authority of South Africa) and professional bodies such as SANEF (South African National Editors Forum) as possible solutions to the problem of freedom reconciliation with regards to social responsibility (Fourie, 2007:194). 2.1.2.
The ‘grand old men’ described can also be applied to the four, elite, professional institutions Buck was against during her case. With an aura of professional legitimacy, these powerful institutions work under the belief that the government and society should be ruled by an elite group of technical experts. With their elite professions, Dr. Albert Priddy, Harry Laughlin, Aubrey Strode, and Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes saw it within their right to control who could reproduce, and who would reproduce valuable babies for the
Consumerism and materialism are not new phenomenons and has been included in many discussions about solidarity and solicitude towards the poor nations and the environmental issues of the global world. The discussion towards these issues seems often to be boisterous, polarized, and not very pragmatic. Especially economists point of view is that materialism and consumerism both are necessities for economic growth and thereby prosperity for the nation. Milton Friedman one of the most famous economist, who has ever lived, argued that the only way you can achieve freedom is by having a capitalistic system. He also argued that all countries in the world runs on greed and that economic prosperity gives freedom and this particular determinant is the only reason why we even worry and can act upon social unfairness and global warming.
Fitzgerald offers up commentary on a diffusion of themes — justice, energy, greed, betrayal, the American dream, and so forth. Of all of the topics, possibly none is extra well developed than that of social stratification. The Great Gatsby is seemed as a remarkable piece of social observation, providing a bright peek into American lifestyles within the 1920s. Fitzgerald carefully sets up his novel into awesome corporations but, in the long run, each group has its very own troubles to contend with, leaving a effective reminder of what a precarious vicinity the sector genuinely is. By developing distinct social lessons — vintage money, new cash, and no cash — Fitzgerald sends robust messages about the elitism jogging during every strata of society.
First is the method and approach the philosopher and second is the philosopher 's agenda that made him came up with the methods he used. It can be defined as the reflection of our political institution such as our government system and how the current regime lead a nation. Political Philosophers often apply their own principle on what’s the current system they are seeing. This said method includes analyzing basic ideas like freedom, justice, authority and democracy and apply them to the current political state. Some philosophy ends up changing the current political state of a place.
If we take a non-fiction book that was written in 1922, we might ask ourselves whether the book is relevant in this day and age. One such book was written by the author F. Scott Fitzgerald and it goes by; “The Great Gatsby”. The contents of the novel actually hold pretty valuable and relatable materials regarding materialism in today’s society. It also touches on the idea that people are not what they seem to be even if they say they are. This in and of itself is highly relevant because human behavior stays fairly comprehensible throughout history.
Comparative research, according to Mills, “refers to the evaluation of the similarities, differences, and associations between entities. Entities may be based on many lines such as statements from an interview or individual, symbols, case studies, social groups, geographical or political configurations, and cross-national comparisons” [2013, 3]. This definition suggests that the aim of this kind of research is to give an outline of the entities’ similarities while also identifying the “unique aspects” of the compared units of analyses. Social science researchers use comparative analysis as a method to their studies [Lor 2011, 2]. While Lor  recognizes comparative method as a methodology, he also stated that other social scientists refer to it as a subfield.