INTRODUCTION Throughout history philosophers always debated the existence of free will. In society, free will defined as everyone can decide what they want to do. If it is about the freedom, people must have chance of making choices. Moreover, it is not enough to be given such a chance, it will also allow the use of this chance must be equipped with mechanism. The “will” is the name of this mechanism.
Humans have different tendencies of evilness in them. God gave us free will and we can therefore choose whether or not we enter into a loving relationship with our creator. However, with free will comes the ability to reject God and make wrong choices. I believe this theodicy rightly emphasises that much of the evil and suffering we see in the world is the responsibility of man and not God. Each of us makes choices every day which can ultimately result in our own or others suffering, whether we see that suffering or not.
However, many people do not agree; often Americans and others that value free-will choices and human power to make and change their own lives and believe their futures are in their own hands. Obviously, these are two unique ways to look at life. This is not a new battle, though. People have been fighting with the idea of fate versus free will for centuries, even back to the works of Sophocles around 400 BC. More recent thinkers have contributed their thoughts, such as Pierre Laplace and his “demon” in the 18th century.
There is no evidence that states people can unquestionably know whether fate or free-will is real. Most people believe that their fate is chosen by God, and free-will is the concept of making your own choices without fate intervening. I believe in a combination of both free-will and fate. There are arguments to support both concepts; however, I think that everyone has free-will, and the choices made through free-will lead to fate. Although many people will argue that there is only free-will or only fate, with both free-will and fate people are given a feeling of independence and distinguish that life has a purpose which are both shown in Macbeth.
This reflects the idea that humans do not have free will because if people were genuinely and consistently capable of benevolence, they would freely decide to make the ‘right’ decisions. In order for free will free will to be tangible, an individual would have to have control over his or her actions regardless of any external factors. It can be argued that the inevitability of
Then if it is true that humans have free will then would that not make us as powerful as God himself. Thinking of it from this angle kind of blew my mind because I felt like this is the complete and total answer to everything being questioned. How could this be possible though? Renick uses Martin Luther and John Calvin to help support this argument to an extent. He says, "They couldn't imagine God was less than all-knowing or that he could be wrong, so they concluded that humans must not have free choice."
Perhaps, the quality that distinguishes and makes us unique - is only an illusion and man-it is the same animal, and only imagines himself above the rest? Battles on this topic have been conducted for a long time. And I want to try to express my position on this issue. I do not believe in free will, but I do not believe that it is a myth. Let's start from the beginning.
Niyazi Nabiyev Reading and Writing IV Compare Contrast Essay – Final Draft 20.05.2014 Totally freedom can be described as: “The right, given to people by God, to create their own choices.” You freedom cannot be damaged by any power other than God. Humans can always work out their freedom when selection. However, when their choices come incompatible with the rules set by a greater energy, they might experience repercussions depending on how they select to use their freedom. The more limitations enforced upon someone’s freedom the more limited their capability to create choices become. The level to which someone may work out their freedom can be described as their “freedom.” Therefore, the more rules enforced upon