Change is frightening to some, but inevitable to all. The United States of America once used slaves as labor. The outlawing of this was heavily opposed but the nation turned out fine. America once used children as labor and ignored working conditions. The illegality of this was also opposed in fear of ruining the economy. The nation prospered nonetheless. Jean Toomer evaluates a different kind of change in his poem “Reaper”. This poem looks at machines vs. the humans it replaces. Toomer clearly writes in support of humanity and against the change occurring. He unsuccessfully uses this poem to reinforce his opinion with humanizing details and contrastingly dark graphics. Any praise of the human field workers is very subtle. Toomer is very descriptive …show more content…
Rhetorically, rats are very negative. Here, Toomer seems to use them to provoke ethos. He could’ve used a dog or a cat that happened to be in the field, but instead chose an animal most people in 1923 wanted dead in any manner. Regardless, the “squealing bleeds” and “Blood-stained” blade (ll. 6-7) provide a dark graphic that would make anyone feel sorry for the rat and hate the machine. The animal was simply the wrong choice. Again, this reveals a logical fallacy. Nowhere does the author provide evidence that the field workers wouldn’t kill a rat. Realistically, any one of those workers would gladly kill one hundred rats. Toomer disregards this and uses the bloody image as an attack despite logic. Jean Toomer does not separate this poem into two halves, ignoring the contrasting nature of the poem. If anything, he creates parallelism by making the reapers and the horses black. This dilutes the difference between human labor and machines. It goes against the overall message of the poem. Toomer could’ve made the mower much more brutal and terrifying, but he didn’t. He could’ve actually praised the reapers but instead chose to include the most monotonous details possible. In reality, this topic of machines vs. man is as polarizing as child labor and slavery. Jean Toomer didn’t write the poem with this
The rats have become much more numerous lately because the trenches are no longer in good condition” (Remarque 101).
In “Halloween in the Anthropocene,” Craig Santos Perez uses the structure of his poem to make his point. Although it is a prose poem, it is still separated into stanzas. These stanzas do not follow the structure of the sentences, but rather the structure of his argument. For example, Perez urges us to “[p]raise the souls of black // boys, enslaved by supply chains” (3-4) through not one, but two stanzas.
Rat and his platoon are sitting at their camp where they see a baby water buffalo, he proceeds to abuse and torture this innocent animal. “He shot it twice in the flanks. It wasn’t to kill; it was to hurt…but for now it was a question of pain. He shot off the tail.” (O’Brien 22).
2015: A promising year, full of opportunities, though less than 3 months away from coming to a close. Not more than 100 years ago, things were not the same as they exist now. Major problems were faced in eras such as the Progressive Era. Such problems that people faced back then were women’s suffrage, child labor, and deforestation.
The rats were one of the main reasons for an unhealthy factory. Rats carried germs and diseases, however workers had to deal with that. They were exposed to being contaminated. “There was no place for men to wash their hands before they ate their dinner, and so they
In order to get rid of the rats they used rat poison and when they would get the meat there was dead rats in there as well their poison and they would drag the meat on the ground
The Poem “The Poet” by Tom Wayman is a poem that takes the reader through the physical characteristics of your average poet. The entirety of the “The Poet” consists of a list of 14 descriptors that could be used to describe the typical poet. Each of the descriptive phrases seems to be negative towards the unknown poet that he is talking about. Although the poem seems quite literal, a figurative message is portrayed though text, tone, structure and the literary devices used in the poem. To start off, the specific word usage that Wayman chose to use gives off the impression that poets have their drawbacks.
For instance, while in the trenches at the front ugly, fat, and hungry rats would attempt to eat the soldiers’ bread and cheese. Since food was scarce and the men had no alternative option, they
The intense details of the unsanitary conditions simply overshadow the true purpose behind Sinclair’s writing because it is more memorable. In today’s world if people heard about “meat that had tumbled out on the floor, in the dirt and sawdust, where workers had tramped and spit and uncounted amount of germs…thousands of rats [racing] about on it” (Sinclair 1450, there is no doubt that they would never consider eating in the place that was just documented about. While reading about poisoned rats being thrown into the food hopper along with their droppings, and the bread that killed them, it is nearly impossible for a reader to continue on without cringing at the thought of such filth. After reading about an incident that would affect
Tim the enchanter attempts to warn King Arthur of the horrendous beast guarding the cave by stating “Well, that’s no ordinary rabbit. That’s the most foul, cruel, and bad-tempered rodent you ever set eyes on... Look, that rabbit’s got a vicious streak a mile wide. It’s a killer”(Gilliam). The rabbit’s role of a monster is ironic because a rabbit is not stereotypically a villainous creature.
Also musophobia (rat phobia) is not uncommon. Orwell used rats to help the reader feel how winston felt about rats. About how Winston betrayed Julia to not get his face torn off by rats. Orwell used rats to put the reader in Winston 's shoes and have them not judge winston over his decision because they possibly would have done the
When first reading George Orwell’s Animal Farm, one might assume it to be a simple narrative about Farm Animals. However, through closer analysis, you begin to see the allegorical connections and satire of the work. By drawing parallels to certain major events and individuals from the Russian Revolution, Orwell is able to provide a political commentary about the harsh conditions caused by the Revolution. In George Orwell 's Animal Farm, he uses Napoleon, Snowball, and Mr. Jones to show the allegorical connections, as well as its satirical motives.
We are able to see this when Whitman says “The boatman singing what belongs to him in his boat, the deckhand singing on the steamboat deck, The shoemaker singing as he sits on his bench, the hatter singing as he stands”(Whitman, 5-7). That quote shows how the people like doing there job. But in the poem “I, Too” it talks about racism and how he is going to overcome it, we can see this when Hughes states “Besides, They’ll see how beautiful I am And be ashamed(15-17)” this shows that he doesn 't care about what they think about him because he know that he is beautiful. This shows how the two poems are different by how they both have different stories and meanings behind the writing. They are different stories because the two talk about two different things like in “I Hear America Singing,” Whitman talks about how everyone loves what they do and want to sing because of it while in the poem “I, Too,” Hughes writes about racism and how he can overcome it, which shows how different the two poems
In the poem, the “folks stare,” because it is a rare sight according to the tone it took place in. I would assume it took place during the eighteen hundred up to the nineteen hundred. The folks staring become indignant, in other words, resentful, offended, or irritated. They felt this way because discrimination was still a big event occurring. People grew a hatred over the color of one’s skin and for being racist, this ticked some people off.
“Animal Farm” by George Orwell, is a story to show how absolute power corrupts, just as Stalin’s power did during the Russian Revolution in 1917. In the allegory “Animal Farm” each character represents a political figure from the days around the Russian Revolution. For example, Joseph Stalin is represented by a pig named Napoleon, Squealer, another pig, represents Stalin’s propaganda department, and the dogs represent the Secret Police (KBG). Using the nine dogs that Napoleon raises (intimidation), Squealer (propaganda), and manipulation, Orwell illustrates how Napoleon was able to gain and maintain control of the farm. The nine dogs that stay by Napoleon at all times are useful for Napoleon to gain and maintain control of the farm because they scare the other animals, intimidating them so that they do not disobey Napoleon.