ipl-logo

Jeremy Bentham's Theory Of Deterrence

127 Words1 Page

1. prevent others from committing similar offences. Jeremy Bentham’s theory states that deterrence should be the main purpose of punishment. Since individual deterrence deals with the concept of preventing the same individual from committing another offense, an example that can be used is a DWI. Individuals who are convicted of a DWI face consequences that include jail time, loss of license, and excessive fines which ultimately may make them rethink committing this crime or any crime with similar consequences.
Because general deterrence uses one individual as an example for the rest of the population, an example that can be used is the three strike law. This law basically states that after a third serious or violent felony charge, one will

Show More
Related

  • Themes In The Devil's Highway

    1182 Words  | 5 Pages

    C) Bare-Life Prevention through Deterrence The following two main concepts are explored: prevention through deterrence and spaces of exception. These concepts are a consistent theme throughout the book, The Devil's Highway. First, for this section, the concept of prevention through deterrence is explored.

    Read More

  • What Are The Crimes Of Stephen J. Hayes And Joshua Komisarjevsky

    1997 Words  | 8 Pages

    While many opponents argue the economics of the issue, they fail to acknowledge that the main goals of punishment are to correct behavior that is deviant from the law and to prevent similar incidences from occurring. Without capital punishment, the culprits would not have to confront the potential of death, meaning that the marginal cost of violent crime would be diminished. Therefore, capital punishment is an effective method to deter

    Read More

  • Offender Specific Deterrence

    96 Words  | 1 Pages

    When a judge is considering sentencing to convict an offender specific deterrence should be more valuable than general deterrence but both are needed in the sentencing process. For the offender not to reoffend specific deterrence need to be embedded to determine the certainty of the crime. So the offender will not commit the same crime twice. Overall doing the sentencing process the judge have the right to use this offender specific deterrence to promote general deterrence to the public. This will allow other to fear the consequences and possibly punishment if they commit this specific crime.

    Read More

  • Sentencing Philosophies In The Criminal Justice System

    663 Words  | 3 Pages

    As we know, there are many ways criminals can be punished. When sentencing happens, the defendant is usually sentenced to the following punishments, listed from minor to extreme: Fines Community service Diversion programs Probation GPS monitoring Jail Prison Death penalty (Rio Salado, 2022). Most of these punishments can be listed under either the utilitarian or retributive theory of punishment. The utilitarian theory seeks to punish offenders to 'deter' future wrongdoings.

    Read More

  • Pros And Cons Of Indeterminate Sentencing

    640 Words  | 3 Pages

    Determinate sentencing can reduce bias of judges and juries adding consistency to sentencing. The predetermined sentence, if found guilty for an offender, is solely based off of the crime and not the race, religion or identity. This consistency, however, doesn’t allow any discretion for judges to impose sentences based off of the circumstances of the crime. The problem with determinate sentencing is that the offender would serve his or her entire sentence. This meaning the offender would not be released until the sentence that was imposed was carried out.

    Read More

  • Role Of Criminal Sentencing In The United States

    443 Words  | 2 Pages

    Deterrence is future oriented to prevent crimes. Deterrence has two types general and specific. General is an individual punishment to dissuade others from committing crimes and specific is an individual being punished for additional

    Read More

  • African American Incarceration Analysis

    1485 Words  | 6 Pages

    The retribution part is to punish the person for the crime that they permitted against society, and the incapacitation part is to remove that person out of society so they do no further harm. Deterrence means the prevention of future crime, and the rehabilitation teaches life skills and in the betterment. However, author Sandiford says that instead of solving crime, mass incarceration has infected our communities and striking them with devastating symptoms, and prison costs have skyrocketed, inmates ' families have been torn apart, and the system is overwhelmingly stratified by race and class (Sandiford,

    Read More

  • Discretion In Criminal Justice

    802 Words  | 4 Pages

    Although this is arguably a little extreme, the case about making a point stands. Through this message, society now has the potential to grasp how certain matters are treated by the law. One of the issues with mandatory sentencing is that there is no flexibility for any future cases. Mr Cowdery, a retired DPP officer said, "judges needed discretion in sentencing to ensure the punishment fitted with the circumstances of the crime and the criminal themselves". Mandatory sentencing poses a large threat to society, due to the limitation on a judge 's ability to sentence in accordance with the severity of the offence, an individual may receive a punishment much harsher than they

    Read More

  • Indeterminate Sentencing

    147 Words  | 1 Pages

    1. The difference between specific and general deterrence is the focus population. Specific deterrence focuses on deterring convicted offenders from repeating offenses. General deterrence focuses on deterring people who have not been arrested away from crime. 2.

    Read More

  • The New Jim Crow Summary

    1517 Words  | 7 Pages

    The deterrence theory suggests that “the severity of criminal sanctions dissuades other potential offenders from committing crimes out of fear of punishment. ”4 That is applicable to the individuals that are punished and to people in the community. Nevertheless, prison’s effectiveness is often questioned as an effective deterrent to crime. Studies have shown that longer sentences have a small effect on whether offenders commit crimes or not, and the National Academy of Sciences determined that “insufficient evidence exists to justify predicating policy choices on the general assumption that harsher punishments yield measurable deterrent effects.

    Read More

  • Annotated Bibliography On Death Penalty

    1145 Words  | 5 Pages

    Deterrence and the Death Penalty: The Views of the Experts. The Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology (1973-), 87(1), 1. doi:10.2307/1143970 This article was written by Michael L. Radelet and Ronald L. Akers. They both consulted experts on criminology and criminal behaviour to evaluate the effectiveness of the Death Penalty.

    Read More

  • Jean Hampton's Moral Education Theory Of Punishment Analysis

    992 Words  | 4 Pages

    The attractiveness of this theory is primarily based on the ethical code that Hampton subscribes to, which is that pain-inflicted punishments should not be condoned when it comes to disciplining wrongdoers. Rather, constructive analysis done pertaining to why certain actions are morally wrong in society would be intellectually stimulating and productive for both the wrongdoers and the public, all while avoiding the infliction of physical pain. Compared to the retributivist argument, which circulates around the idea that the purpose of punishment is to make wrongdoers pay for their misdeeds, and that they should be treated the way that they have treated others, the MET is a more humane way to treat wrongdoers, and in the long run, would perhaps help them emerge from confinement as better citizens within society, rather than as potential repeat offenders. Therefore, the appeal of the MET stems from the positive implications of treating wrongdoers with respect and dignity, all while teaching them why their actions were wrong while simultaneously instilling positive and moral values in their psyche before allowing them to re-enter

    Read More

  • Compatibilism, Determinism, Questions And Answers

    1479 Words  | 6 Pages

    Punishment serves as a method to deter people from wrongdoings, and to let people know what actions are wrong. If there were no negative repercussions to wrongful acts, people would simply attribute their wrongdoings to determinism and claim they are not morally responsible for their actions, since their actions stem from prior causes that they have no control

    Read More

  • Specific Deterrence Essay

    447 Words  | 2 Pages

    General and Specific deterrence have good and bad effects on citizens. It prevents crime and some cases and fuels the rage in some. General deterrence focuses on preventing the crime before it happens. The thought of spending life in prison for committing a murder is very scary to me. You would think that could deter criminals from committing that crime.

    Read More

  • Essay On Harsh Punishment

    1048 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the case of the death penalty, it has the added bonus in guaranteeing that the person would not offend again. Supporters of harsh punishments argue that the would-be criminal would consider the costs versus the benefits of committing a crime. If the costs outweigh the benefits, then it is assumed that he would stop what he is doing, effectively ‘deterred’. Furthermore, the usage of harsh punishments to effectively deter crime is ethically justified as it prevents more people from falling victim to crime. However it is extremely difficult to judge a punishment’s effectiveness based on its deterrence effect, consequently we must consider other variables that would entail a person to commit a crime.

    Read More

More about Jeremy Bentham's Theory Of Deterrence

Open Document