The bill of rights protects us as humans from neglect, abuse and being enslaved. Animals should have the same protection as we do. Why should we allow animals to be abused? Why is it un-humane if we put a tracker chip in a humans head but humane for an animal? Humans have feeling like humans and their feelings should be protected like just like ours.
It is simply known as the inherent value of animals. Inherent value is something that explains the value of existence as an individual in the world (The Case for Animal Rights 185). Tom Regan, an American philosopher, professor emeritus of philosophy at North Carolina State University who specializes in animal rights theory explains that regardless of race, status and human and non-human beings, every living beings has its own inherent value of the earth (187). He continually emphasized that there are no differences that both animal and human souls are mortal, so it should not be discriminated with its intrinsic value. Additionally, science contributes to following ethical value in researches using animals.
Animals are also life, they are living things have feelings and emotions too. Human need cherish animals and love to animals to form harmony between human and animal. If we love and treat animals, they perhaps help us as we get troubles or problems. Animals bring happiness to human. If we continue hurt animals, maybe they will revenge to human in future.
In the principle, 3R represents “reduction”, “replacement” and “refinement” respectively. First, institutions should reduce the number of experimental animals as many as they can. Second, researchers must use insensible materials instead of living animals when it is possible. Third, researchers need to be kind to animals not only by improving their living environments but also by ensuring particular care to keep them from pain and panic. In this way, laws are able to assist in protecting animals and promoting the reasonable animal
Many of them are playing a key role unnoticeably in maintaining the balance of nature. All religions and civilization have taught the lesson of contentment, "pious living and harmony with nature”. All religions give foremost importance to humanity and human beings should be kind and just to their fellow creatures. But it is a nasty approach and greed of human beings which abated them towards indiscriminate harvesting of wild animals. At the jurisprudential level, both anthropocentric and eco-centric have the same opinion that wild animals should
Despite the laws that governments such as the US and UK established towards animals, they only seem to be effective when a conflict arises between the owner and the animal. Furthermore, the author’s compare the treatment of human slaves to animals, to highlight the lack of rights animals have. Hence, in order to protect the interests of animals, individuals must first begin by providing animals with the minimal needs (water, food and shelter). However, such needs require a reasonable amount of money. Overall, the authors claim that as humans we
While testing on animals might help humans slightly, is it what we should do? First, humans test animals for cures that are supposed to work on humans, but testing only proves how it works on different animals. Secondly, when something is tested on animals and is proven safe and effective, it can still be useless or detrimental to humans
The use of animals in psychological research Animals have rights as well. But they just can’t refuse to some threat as humans can, they can´t give their consent. Humans certainly have more official rights and this way they avoid being mistreated. There must be a justification as to why animals will be used in any type of research. Animals can´t undergo harmful experiments, these should be planned as safely as the researcher possibly can.
It is essential to take actions to protect wildlife from extinction. By doing so, we do not only ensure their survival, but also protect the diversity of the ecosystem. As a result, it will help improve the ecological health of the earth. Humans for their selfish comforts have destroyed wild life extensively and therefore, there is need to conserve wild life. Saving wildlife and wilderness is the responsibility of all thinking people.
Can also bring a meaning of human concern as well as animal ethics that have a support from science to certain extent. This consideration is a need because at the end they will be used by human. For instance, animal killed for human’s food, keep as pets and this treating animal were reflected in religion. As the majority of the global society accept the fact that human can be killed for food, there comes up responsibility among the society to ensure that the animal feel no pain, injury, distress or suffering. When mention about killing, the most focus aspect in animal welfare is slaughtering.