ipl-logo

Jim Crow Laws Dbq

725 Words3 Pages

Opening Statement: The Jim Crow Laws were a local and state law that was enforced in the early 20th century that regulated segregation. My side of the argument is that they were unconstitutional. During this time period the color of your skin played a big role in who you were as a person. The passing of the Jim Crow Laws made an already racist and unconstitutional mindset legal. Argument 1: During this time period there was a lot of violence towards African Americans. Once the southern social order was emancipated and all the enslaved Americans were set free with their full freedom. The white Americans rebutted by creating terroristic hate groups such as the Ku Klux Klan whose main goal was to ensure a white supremacy for the country. …show more content…

The Jim Crow laws were in direct conflict with federal laws, including the Civil Rights Act of 1866, which guaranteed equal protection under the law to all citizens, and the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which banned discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. The Supreme Court's decision in Brown v. Board of Education (1954) declared segregation in public schools unconstitutional, further affirming the supremacy of federal law over state law and rendering Jim Crow laws …show more content…

Board of Education and various Civil Rights Acts passed by Congress.While it is true that the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment were violated by Jim Crow laws, some proponents of segregation argued that these laws were necessary to maintain order and protect the interests of both whites and blacks. They argued that separate facilities for different races were not inherently unequal and that the federal government had no right to interfere in state affairs.However, the Supreme Court's decisions in Brown v. Board of Education and subsequent cases recognized that separate facilities for different races were inherently unequal, as they perpetuated a system of segregation that denied African Americans equal access to resources and opportunities. The Court also held that the federal government had a duty to ensure that state laws did not violate individual rights protected by the Constitution.Therefore, while there may be arguments against the constitutionality of Jim Crow laws, the fact remains that they were struck down by the Supreme Court as violations of the Equal Protection and Due Process Clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment and were superseded by federal civil rights

Show More
Related

How Did Homer Plessy Use To Improve American Life

666 Words | 3 Pages

These laws led the way for the Jim Crow laws and would not be considered unconstitutional for almost 58 years in the Brown vs. Board of Education

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Jim Crow Laws

202 Words | 1 Pages

Jim crow laws prompt Jim Crow Laws were a complex system of laws that separated races and deprived americans of base civil rights. Jim Crow laws prevented white and colored people from using the same textbooks and telephone booths. First of all, “books shall not be interchangeable between the white and colored schools…”(SB 198) This law interfered with colored children’s learning because white children got higher quality textbooks, while colored children didn’t get the best textbooks.

Read More

How Did The Little Rock Nine Impact The Civil Rights Movement At All-White High School

704 Words | 3 Pages

the board of education by entering an all-white high school to put a stop to segregation in the south. Brown V.S. The Board of education was a court case that ruled separating children based on race unconstitutional although thus did not stop many southern states who created the Jim Crow laws. Jim Crow Laws were laws that stated that whites and blacks still needed to be separated but in the end, they were all equal. Eugene Fabulous, an American politician “Was sent by Arkansas Governor to the school, Fabulous had declared his opposition to integration and intention to deny a federal court order requiring desegregation”(Jaynes).

Read More

The Little Rock Nine

1080 Words | 5 Pages

However, the Supreme Court had declared that the legal separation of blacks and whites (segregation) in public facilities was illegal. In 1954, the right to an equal education was given to black students by the United States Supreme Court. Unluckily, even after 3 years, African Americans were still being forced to attend separate and subordinate schools. They also still went through "Jim Crow" laws that compelled them to apply dissimilar public facilities from whites. ▲ The 14th and 15th amendment (Scott, unknown)

Read More

Jim Crow Law Case Study

4582 Words | 19 Pages

(Basic Rights of Citizenry). Amendments. Restrictive legislation based on race continued following the Plessy decision, its reasoning was not overturned until Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka in 1954. (CITE) The Brown v. Board of Education decisions of the mid-1950s literally altered the complexion of the body politics of American culture, but left the head, and to a lesser degree, the heart, on the same two-society track, one White and the other non-White (black, brown, red, and yellow), one of “haves,” the other, “have-nots (Taylor & Francis, 2015).

Read More

The Significance Of Brown V. Board Of Education

3468 Words | 14 Pages

Brown v. Board of Education was a consolidated case that was a landmark decision by the United States Supreme Court in 1954, which faced the question, “Does the segregation of public education based solely on race violate the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment?” that declared that “separate but equal educational facilities for racial minorities are inherently unequal violating the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment” (Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka (1)). This essay will thoroughly cover the background and context of this case, the arguments presented on both sides, contemporary and legal reactions to the case, the impact of the decision, and its current relevance. The case originated in Topeka, Kansas

Read More

The Prosecution And Defense Of Brown V. The Board Of Education

484 Words | 2 Pages

The prosecution and defense of Brown v. The Board of Education is known for their perspectives on how schools for Black children were not equal to the white schools, and that segregation violated the equal protection clause of the 14th Amendment. The Brown v. The Board of Education case was a Supreme Court case stating that laws establishing separate public schools for black and white students were unconstitutional. This case was one of the cornerstones of the civil rights movement, and helped establish the precedent that “separate but equal” education and other services were not in fact equal. The Prosecution, Brown and his attorneys claimed that segregation in any school was harmful.

Read More

Brown V Board Of Education Research Paper

1718 Words | 7 Pages

Brown v. Board of Education provided students, both of color and not of color, with an equal opportunity for education. Through this, America demonstrates its core value of equality. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 also supports America’s core value of equality, even though it faced much opposition; especially from white Southerners. The Act was made in response to Southerners refusing to comply with the Brown v. Board of Education decision. The Act dealt with “desegregating public accommodations, or services such as motels and restaurants tied to interstate commerce” in addition to “equal opportunity employment.”

Read More

Plessy Vs Segregation

58 Words | 1 Pages

after slavery was abolished, the southern states passed laws to segregate blacks and whites. The segregation included separate schools for blacks and whites. A challenge to these laws reached the U.S. Supreme Court, which ruled in 1896 in Plessy v. Ferguson that it was a reasonable use of state power to require "separate but equal" accommodations for blacks.

Read More

Brown V Board Of Education Essay

1203 Words | 5 Pages

In the famous 1954 Supreme Court case Brown v. Board of Education of Topeka, the justices held unanimously that the racial division of children in public schools was unlawful. One of the foundations of the fight for civil rights was Brown v. Board of Education, which established the precedent that "separate but equal" education and various other services were not, in fact, similar at all. In Plessy v. Ferguson, the United States Supreme Court ruled that racial discrimination in public accommodations was permissible as long as facilities for Black and White individuals were equal. The court's ruling maintained "Jim Crow" laws, which prohibited African Americans from accessing the same buses, schools, and other public facilities as white people,

Read More

Segregation In Schools In The 1960s

319 Words | 2 Pages

Throughout the 1960s, a series of acts were passed in America to aid minorities in the areas of education, employment, public accommodation, and housing. The Civil Rights Act of 1964 prohibited discrimination based on race, color, religion, national origin in places of employment and public accommodation. Prior to this act, African Americans were banned or segregated in public areas such as restrooms, restaurants, theaters, and even schools. Segregation in schools had been a major problem since before Brown v. Board of Education in 1957 ruled that segregation was a violation of the Fourteenth Amendment. This remained an issue in universities around the country when they refused the attendance of African American students until the 1960s when

Read More

Brown V Board Of Education Essay

736 Words | 3 Pages

Brown v. Board of Education was a crucial cornerstone of the civil rights movement and is regarded as one of the most important Supreme Court decisions. This lawsuit drew attention to the racial disparities that African Americans experienced and called into question the "separate but equal" ideology that was implemented in educational facilities. The Supreme Court justices unanimously held in this landmark case that racial segregation in public schools was unconstitutional. Segragation went against the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, which maintains that no state can "deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws". Brown's judgment did not result in instant integration; instead, during the

Read More

History Of The Jim Crow Laws

76 Words | 1 Pages

The Jim Crow Laws were brought up to Congress in February 22, 1908. Crow Laws were trying to make spate cars and spate the two classes. The Jim Crow laws were also trying to grant “Colored people the right to vote”. The Jim Crow Laws were made fun of by the Jury and got denied brutally. This Article really put me in prospective of how poorly the African American people were treated back in the day.

Read More

Jim Crow Laws

452 Words | 2 Pages

By the implementation of the inferiority among black people compared to their white counterparts, instilled a vitriol that was and still is extremely devastating to a more equal future. Shortly following the civil war, the south being bitter in the aftermath of surrender, took it among themselves to create the segregation laws. Laws that came to be known as the incredibly devious Jim Crow laws. These insidious Laws were enforced by the former Confederate southern states, which began in the late 1870's and early 1880's, that actually made it legal to segregate blacks from whites. The Jim Crow laws confined legal rights of black people to be designated their own colored public facilities, as well as their schools, even to water drinking fountains.

Read More

Jim Crow Laws: Unfair And Unjust To African-Americans

668 Words | 3 Pages

5th Hour Cause and Effect Essay Jim Crow laws The Jim Crow laws were unfair and unjust to all African-Americans by making them unequal. The Jim Crow laws are laws that enforced racial segregation in the Southern United States. It used the term separate but equal, even though conditions for African Americans were always worst than their white counterparts. They could not eat at the same restaurant as white people, they could not used the same restrooms, and they couldn't even use the same drinking fountain.

Read More

More about Jim Crow Laws Dbq

Open Document