It 's insane that a college football coach could make more than $7 million annually. It 's especially crazy in a multibillion-dollar sports/entertainment entity that still — laughingly — passes itself off as a nonprofit operation in order to maintain its federal antitrust protection.
But it 's the price of doing business. Or rather, the price of doing "nonprofit business."
It 's an approach dripping with hypocrisy. Michigan should be able to pay Jim Harbaugh whatever it can because college football coaching is a market-driven profession. According to a USA TODAY Sports coaching salary study, Harbaugh is set to be the second-highest-paid college football coach this season — behind Alabama 's Nick Saban — at more than $7 million.
Free market
…show more content…
But it 's also why Wisconsin chancellor Dr. Rebecca Blank came off as appreciatively antiquated in her thinking when she told USA TODAY Sports that she had a serious problem with fellow Big Ten programs like Michigan and Ohio State paying football coaches such outrageous sums.
The Buckeyes ' Urban Meyer ranked third on the USA TODAY list at $5.9 million. Michigan State 's Mark Dantonio ranked fifth in the Big Ten and 21st overall at $3.7 million.
"That really begins to threaten the whole sense that we are not professional athletic teams," Blank said. "I 'm not terribly happy about the fact that they made those choices. That 's my opinion."
But at least the Badgers practice what they preach. The salary for their football coach has remained basically the same the past four years. And Wisconsin is on its third coach during that time frame, partly because it refused to better compensate its coach and assistants.
It might not move Wisconsin closer to the College Football Playoff. But at least it can look itself in the mirror and not see a flaming hypocrite.
Spread sheet: A 14-10 overall record — following a 3-3 week against the point spread (thanks again for nothing, Sparty) — for the all-seeing, all-knowing famed seer, sage, soothsayer and former recruiting entertainment director for Louisville basketball … The
The Gators chose a man who turned the Rams into a 10-2 team, while the Cornhuskers settled for a name with mediocre results. For a program like Nebraska, firing Pelini in the first place does make some sense. The Cornhuskers are historically one of the best programs around, but didn’t find themselves competing for national titles during Pelini’s seven-year
I remember for years Michael Wilborn was against paying college student athletes. Mr. Wilborn always said on “Pardon the Interruption”, free room and board, free meals, and tuition is enough compensation. He did his research on how much money the NCAA draws from different networks, from CBS/Tuner Sports March Madness made $10.8 billion exact between 2011 through 2024. Break it down by years that is a total of $11 billion dollars for three weekends in one month. That stat turns Michael Wilborn statement from not paying student athletes to pay the students athletes
Coaches get paid, especially if they win. The following year after a March Madness run, coaches see a bonus or salary increase if their team excels. An example of this would be John Calipari of the University of Kentucky. According to the USA today, Calapari can earn up to $800,000 dollars each year based on the team’s performance (USA today). Basically meaning how far his Kentucky Wildcats go in the NCAA tournament.
College Varsity Athletes Should be Paid In this paper, I argue that college varsity athletes should be paid for playing sports that bring in revenue. In particular, College football and basketball because they bring in the majority of the revenue for the schools. The revenue accomplished by college sports programs continues to increase, due to the growth in interest of the NCAA basketball tournament and the college football playoffs (Berry III, Page 270). Throughout the past few years, one of the main topics debated in college sports is whether or not the athletes should be paid.
According to Nick Baumgardner of MLive, in 1996 there was an allegation that a booster named Ed Martin gave players money, an investigation started and as the investigation progressed they found out that Ed Martin had given Chris Webber $100,000 before he had even committed to the University of Michigan. The University of Michigan had to vacate the National Championship appearance that was during the “Fab Five’s” freshman season and the “Fab Five’s” entire sophomore year due to Ed Martin paying players while they were attending the University of Michigan. I believe all this could have been prevented if we paid college athletes as they should because Jalen Rose who was a member of the “Fab Five” said, “ “I felt like a professional athlete who wasn’t getting paid.” Think about that he was that popular but didn’t earn a $1 from it.
Statistically showing, at least 100,000 college football players get hurt yearly. College football player’s should get paid to play because these players put themselves at risk for injury, college football is a job, not p.e, and it will help players adjust to college socially and economically. Colleges and the NCAA can make money selling jerseys and other souvenirs that might include the likeness of players, yet the actual players never receive a cent. Every time a football player steps onto the field, they’re risking themselves for injury.
“The highest paid public employee in 40 of the 50 U.S. states is the state university 's head football or basketball coach” (Mitchell & Edelman). These coaches earn so much money and they do put in a lot of work for their teams, but they are not the ones doing the real work. The athletes are the ones out on the field or court playing the game, which is why the players need to be paid as
According to Cork Gaines, “there are now 20 schools that make at least $100 million in sports”. This fact is supported by Figure C (Revenue* of college football teams in 2014 (in million U.S.
To begin with, Salzberg makes a seemly unresearched claim, he claims that “Our universities are providing a free training ground for the super-wealthy owners of professional football teams, while getting little in return”(Salzberg 1). In this quote, he states that universities get little in return, but if one does a little research, the reader can see universities receive a great amount of benefits. For example, colleges can receive money from games in their stadiums whether they win or lose from tickets, concussions, players, and etc. The sports department is a big money makers in universities, not to mention colleges can also can gain publicity, if a player gets famous off the college’s team.
Taking a look at the average college student, should they be paid for what they are studying? Probably not. Then why should college athletes be paid? They shouldn 't get paid just because of their athletic ability. They shouldn 't be paid because they are students, not professionals.
The million dollar question; should college athletes be paid? This is an immense debate, but if you were to ask me, I would say yes, college athletes should be paid. There are a plethora of reasons why college athletes should get paid. College athletes should get paid because of the amount of time they put into their sport, the amount of money everyone else is making off of them, and their overall importance to the school. There are a myriad of reasons that people can argue the opposite way, but, the reasons they should get paid definitely outweigh the reasons they shouldn’t get paid.
" This quote proves that the students are bringing in lots of money and the school has plenty to give. College athletes should be paid because they contribute to the school revenues. When it comes to getting fans in the arena it all happens because of the stars coming out of the locker room. Student athletes can be looked at as advertisement because they persuade people to come watch their skills.
They have to put in work on and off the field of court. Three, the coaches and everybody else but the players are paid. These kids take time from their school work and personal things to get things done for their sports team and don’t get anything in return. “Nick Saban will make $11 million in the year of 2018 coaching the football team of Alabama University.” (www.espn.com/college-sports/story/_/id/6778847/college-athletes-deserve-paid.)
The argument made by these two professors state that Division 1 players qualify as employees under Federal Labor Laws. Since players are under this law, the McCormick’s feel players should get financially compensated due to the physical rigors and balance education simultaneously (Cooper, 2011). It’s unbelievable how this couple thinks Division 1 athletes should get paid. The privilege to attend a university that is costly on full scholarship should be more than enough. Furthermore, student-athletes received stipends as an allowance assist with their livelihood.
The NCAA has appealed.” The NCAA had one simple solution to this problem and that was to remove player images from all commercial use. This has resulted in the cancellation of popular videogames such as ‘NCAA Football’ or ‘NCAA Basketball’ and is also resulted in the removal of names from all NCAA athletic apparel sold to the public such as jerseys. To say that NCAA teams make their schools millions of dollars is an understatement. USA Today and Stanley Eitzen calculated how much money National Basketball League Hall of Fame member and former Georgetown basketball player Patrick Ewing made Georgetown during his college career.