Jimmy Carter's Argument Analysis

Jimmy Carter builds a compelling argument to persuade his audience that the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge should not be developed for industry. He has evidence to back up his argument. He uses reasoning to develop ideas and uses persuasive elements to get his point across. Jimmy uses facts or examples to support his claims. Since he left office, there have been many proposals to open the Arctic Refuge coastal plain to oil drilling. They’ve all been denied because of the opposition by the American people, including the Gwich’in Athabascan Indians of Alaska and Canada, indigenous people whose culture has depended on the Porcupine caribou herd for thousands of years. The short-term economic gain is not worth destroying their homes. He said the Arctic Refuge may provide 1 to 2 percent of the oil our country consumes each day. We can easily conserve more than that amount by driving more fuel-efficient vehicles, we should just use our resources more wisely instead. Another thing is Jimmy uses reasoning to develop ideas and to connect claims and evidence. The tragedy that might occur if this great wilderness was consumed by a web of roads and pipelines, drilling rigs and industrial facilities,

The way he describes his experience when visiting was truly spectacular. They witnessed the migration of tens of thousands of caribou with their newborn calves. In a matter of mere seconds, the sweep of tundra before them became flooded with life, with the sounds of grunting animals and clicking hooves filling the air. He goes on to say that the Arctic Refuge is a symbol of our national heritage and little of that precious wilderness remains among our highways. America is big on leaving a better world for our future generation and he wraps up his argument by saying leaving the Arctic Refuge alone would be the greatest gift we could pass onto