It is common for new nation-states to construct a larger- than- life image of their founding fathers. Jinnah, without whom the creation of Pakistan probably wouldn’t have taken place, is one such heroic figure. However, deifying national leaders, even one with a significant historical impact as Jinnah hamper an honest review of their record. Jinnah possessed a unique authority within the Muslim community, despite being an anglicized, secular and non-practicing Muslim. He became a rallying point for the Indian Muslims who had few powerful and charismatic leaders they could point with pride. To other Indians, Jinnah was an anti-Hindu demagogue, British pawn and political shyster. To the colonial masters, Jinnah was a tough adversary who respected British political traditions. Most successful politicians are opportunistic, ruthless and tenacious in their pursuit of political power even to the extent of getting blood on their hands. They take advantage of prevailing conditions and capitalise on the mistakes of the opposition. Jinnah was no exception and to say otherwise would be ignoring reality. Under Jinnah’s leadership, the communal strategy of the Muslim League stoked and contributed to the stark horrors and strife during Partition. It was a stroke of luck for both the Pakistan …show more content…
However, his political instincts guided him not to press overly hard for a separate state where the majority happened to be Muslims, but others such as Hindus, Christians, Buddhists and people with no faith at all, were to be equal citizens according to a secular constitution. This unambiguous demand would have been much more difficult to sell to Indians resisting the division of the country and those Indian Muslims vehemently opposed to the idea of a secular state. As we know, Jinnah’s tactic of keeping his idea of Pakistan vague coupled with his early passing had far-reaching negative consequences for the new
It was during his role as Prime Minister that he planned and organized the British Army against France which led him win the French and Indian War and also defeated the french in the European Continent. Pitt agreed and sympathized with the Americans, specially in their opposition of the Stamp Act. His oppositions and criticism against the government of King George II and their laws in America, forced him to resign. I wonder what would have happened if he wouldn’t complain as much and would stayed longer as Primer of Minister, may be he would have helped and agreed in the American War of Independence, probably many lives have been
He was a politician but he was a part of one of the democratic parties. James Byrnes lost his popular political figure. He did more stuff then Mr. Byrnes did. In 1810 he was elected for a political congress. Then after that became president.
Just like many other sports cricket is often seen as “just a game,” but it has made a much bigger significance than one might expect. Cricket and politics were deeply intertwined in 20th century India. Cricket helped symbolize and influence political tensions between India and both Pakistan and England, along with other religious rivalry between ethnic groups. Despite this, matches fostered togetherness and became a source of both religious and national pride. Cecil Headlam, an English cricketer and historian, once said in 1903, that Cricket was used as the final step in British colonization.
In the city of Mecca, a man started a new religion known as Islam. This man was Muhammad who was born in about 570 C.E. While going to pray in a cave in the mountains of Mecca, an angel named Gabriel visited Muhammad. Gabriel proclaimed that Muhammad was a prophet, messenger of God. As he received messages from God, Muhammad began to teach and recite them to others. Over time, Islam attracted new followers through military conquest, trade, and the appeal of message, which contributed to the rapid spread of Islam.
Malcolm X was an African American man who joined the nation to islam. He was a symbol of the blacks. In his life he experienced difficult childhood and was in prison for six years. After he was transformed, he began to educate himself and was an active with the debate society. That is when he joined the nation of Islam .
Macbeth is an evil, psycho tyrant who abuses the power that is given to him. But Macbeth had not always been that way. Did you know Macbeth was a war hero? Macbeth was an ambitious man, usually ambitious is consider a good trait to have. In Macbeth particular case ambition caused him to lose control of his mind and humanity.
The Ottoman and Mughal empires both used Islam in their culture, economy, wars, and society. It influenced their art, the way they treated non-Muslims, their motivations for war. It is important to note that both empires were influenced differently by their majority religion. However, both the Ottomans and Mughals were heavily influenced as Islam was a major part of everyday life from the art to the bureaucracy.
The Marāthās, in particular, became so enraged that they eventually gained their independence from the Mughals and established their own empire,” (Gale). The departure of the Marāthās proves the lack of religious tolerance the Mughals had at times. The Marāthās were so enraged at the lack of acceptance that they left the empire rendering it smaller and weaker. This is just one example of the Mughals not only only neglecting to practice religious tolerance, but how refusing to accept all people for their beliefs backfired in the empire’s overall growth and unity.
“The Islamic teachings have left great traditions for equitable and gentle dealings and behavior, and inspire people with nobility and tradition” (H.G. Wells). The society and world around us are greatly influenced by the muslim people, or more specifically, the influence of the Islamic world. Their impact on the world is a controversial topic and their role is also often seen as negative. People are constantly oppressing minorities, but without the Muslims or teachings of Islam, the world wouldn’t be the same. This group of people achieved so many things that are considered necessary to our world today, and not many people recognize that.
Verdict of the Trial of Genghis Khan. After the trial had taken place, I decided that Genghis Khan and the Mongols were uncivilized. During the time of the trial I learned much more of the brutality that had taken place during his reign. The barbaric attitudes and actions of himself and his followers is what led to him being found guilty of being uncivilized.
Muhammad Ali was an athlete formally known as a Cassius Clay before he changed his name to Cassius X and later to Ali after joining the Nation of Islam. He is well known due to his mark on the world as an athlete in boxing. Besides him being an iconic boxer he also remembered as a person who fought for social and political change through his outspoken political positions and this the point where his greatness excelled . Ali had a great political influence on many individuals in the United States. Different occasions portray Ali’s stand on political and social change.
Islam is the second biggest religion and fastest growing in the world today. Islam is a religion that Muslims follow and is a monotheistic faith regarded as revealed through Muhammad as the prophet of Allah. For Muslims, Muhammad is the last prophet and Abraham is the patriarch of the Qur’an, Bible and Torah. Islam is followed by over a billion people and Muslims make up approximately one quarter of the world’s population. Islam spread quickly during the 600’s trade, choice, and conquest.
Malcolm X and Mahatma Gandhi were two incredible men, both fighting for independence among their people. These distinctly different men were among the strongest fighters who set foot in authority. Malcolm X, an African-American leader spread religion to combat the weakening of his fellow African-Americans, as well as to expand the supporters of Muslim beliefs. Mahatma Gandhi, a leader in India’s independence movement from the British, weakened British rule through civil resistance. While Malcolm X and Gandhi both fought for their people’s freedom, their religion, beliefs, and methods for achieving independence differ in certain aspects but also have similar elements.
Khushwant Singh’s Train to Pakistan recounts the event of the Partition of India, which happened in 1947. Set in a fictional village of Mano Majra, the novel aims to depict the cultural and political clash between the Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims and, by following the development of the characters, unveil the moral of humanity. Throughout the novel, Singh portrays the experience of conflict that each character, including Juggut Singh, Iqbal Singh, and Hukum Chand, has to deal with. Based on the characters’ development, Singh’s goal is to present the idea that love always conquers the power of violence and ethnic antagonism. Singh starts off with a description of the Partition and of Mano Majra, a habitat for Sikhs, Hindus, and Muslims.
British India was partitioned into two independent states i.e. Pakistan and India in 1947. The idea behind the creation of Pakistan is to have a home for the Muslims of South Asia. As Pakistan is an Islamic country by the constitution and in contrast India is a secular country. Paksitan and India were founded