The John Birch Society is without a doubt, one of the most bizarre groups in modern American history. Founded in 1958, by American businessman Robert Welch, the society was radical anti-communist group that believed that The United States was under threat, both externally and internally. The Birch Society would go on to propagate many extreme conspiracy theories, such as claiming that President Eisenhower was a member of a secret communist plot. Yet, as D.J Mulloy argues in his book, The World of the John Birch Society, “they had played an essential role in the revitalization of conservatism,” and made “a significant and lasting contribution to America’s Cold War and conspiracy cultures.” In the book, he seeks to examine the society’s worldview, …show more content…
He writes that when William F. Buckley of The National Review wrote a piece condemning the Society and asking Welch to step down, he still needed to assert that “Many decent people belonged to the Society” and that it was controlled by a “lunatic fringe,” but even then Buckley still faced pushback from many conservatives. Mulloy depicts the Goldwater campaign as being the highpoint of the Society’s influence in politics. He states that, “a major problem facing Goldwater was that he was strongly identified with both the radical Right in general and the John Birch Society in particular.” Yet, he argues that Goldwater was afraid to distance himself from radical elements, such as the Birch Society, because of their influence. This, along with several other factors led to him being viewed as an extremist, and after his devastating loss the Society was pushed from the semi-mainstream by conservatives who viewed them as part of the extreme element that led to Goldwater’s …show more content…
history. His sources are wide and varied, using newspapers, secondary historical accounts, and public statements made by both figures inside and outside of the Birch Society. Mulloy uses Welch himself as a source the most extensively however, which does make sense as the Society operated “under completely authoritative control at all levels,” and because most of its ideas came from Welch himself. The book itself is rather short, which leaves out some other important areas that Mulloy could, and perhaps should have covered. For example, throughout the book he mentions The Second Red Scare, McCarthyism and the American Commonest Party, but they are more like passing comments and he doesn’t give enough context. It would have been better if he had another chapter earlier on in book discussing the history of communism in America, so that the audience would have a better idea of the circumstances under which the Society emerged. Nonetheless, Mulloy does an excellent job of describing the history of the John Birch Society, their views, as well as their impact on Cold War conservatism and the book is well worth the
As Broadwater notes, “More concerned with the founders' ideals than with the founders, Bernstein focuses primarily on the evolution of constitutional democracy in the United States" (Broadwater 391). What Bernstein wants to do is to remind modern audiences that their relationship to the founding fathers is one based on political ideology and philosophy than on the details of their individual lives. This means, of course, that Bernstein not only acknowledges that attitudes toward the founding fathers change over generations, but that these changes create a kind of dialogue between the evolving American society and its political
Brown published an article in the Daily Times and Richmond Dispatch attacking Mitchell and Teamoh. Although the author is not clearly identified, it will be assumed that the following source was written by Rev. Brown. The article “Teamoh and the Boston Wood-Pile,” begins by revealing the trouble the men in the Massachusetts Committee came into in Boston. Many Bostonians were furious of the Committee’s treatment of Teamoh during their tour of the South, especially during their stop in Richmond. “But in their trip through the South the Massachusetts legislative committee were mighty glad to shuffle Teamoh off”.
“The term ‘"McCarthyism’" has passed into general usage as a synonym for the anticommunist political repression of the early Cold War”. (Schrecker 3) The Crucible shows the similarities between the Salem witch trials and the Red Scare. The Crucible displays a relationship between the Salem Witch Trials and the fear of McCarthyism in the 1950s. Like The Crucible, with people terrified of witchcraft, people during the Red Scare feared communism and feared the punishment that came with an accusation.
There is quite a bit of literature that discusses Goldwater 's loss to President Johnson in the 1964 presidential election. Today, I will discuss two articles in particular, “Vietnam and the 1964 Election” and “The Defeat of a Maverick.” They both conclude different reasons for Goldwater 's loss, but they also make some similar contentions. Both articles make the point of noting Goldwater 's militant rhetoric. In “The Defeat of a Maverick,” this militant style was seen as his central failing: he was rigidly conservative and had an “unrestrained manner,” (Matthews 662).
Treen’s campaign was ineffective because the bulk of it was based around his morality, and not about his will to get things done in office. Moreover, Treen’s track record in office fell short of Edward’s record. Maginnis believed that “given the immense personal power attached to this office” people chose to vote “not on a political or moral basis but on a psychological one.” In contrast, because of Edwards’ captivating, go-getter personality, the people felt he was a more effective leader than Treen (pg. 72). The public wanted a self-confident, assured person in office who was a “winner” (pg.
Sam Roberts in the article A Decade of Fear argues that Americans turned against each other because of McCarthyism. Roberts supports his argument by explaining and describing the many occurences of paranoia caused by McCarthyism. The author’s purpose is to persuade the reader that McCarthy’s gross grab at power caused tension between Americans. It is clear that the author is directing his claims to an older and more educated audience, due to his cynical tone. I strongly agree with Roberts’ claim.
Christian dominionists, Christian reconstructionists, sovereign citizens, and some Tea Party members are included in the umbrella of New White Nationalism. The John Birch Society has contributed unique ideas to New White Nationalism as a whole that have been adopted by other groups within the New White Nationalism umbrella. The JBS's idea of extreme laissez fair economics has permeated into most of these groups. One explanation for this is that the funding that most of the groups receive is from privately wealthy businessmen, who benefit from pure capitalism's lack of regulation. This idea of laissez-fair economics and lack of government regulation can easily be shifted and seen as support for local government.
In twentieth Century, as the United States and the Soviet Union between the ten years of the Cold War slowly end, in the United States, the "Red Scare" is also in vogue, so many people feel uneasy ( History.com Staff. "Red Scare." History.com. A&E Television Networks, 01 Jan. 2010.
The current world record for solving a 3x3 Rubik’s Cube is 4.59 seconds. While it is possible for people to solve them quickly, only a few can because they know the tips and tricks to the puzzle; they have the upperhand. Even though it seems easy to solve, most people try to solve it for hours, only to give up. This is similar to the American Dream, which states that through hard work, people are able to get wherever they want in life. While the Dream promotes this idea that anyone can achieve their goals, only those with the upperhand can get through all of the challenges that come with trying to reach the end goal.
Amid of the so-called perfect era of the 1950s, political figures of the United States protagonist on their very own soap opera of gossiping, which eventually affected the moral of Americans. The exemplar article “The Smearing of Joe McCarthy: The Lavender Scare, Gossip, and Cold War Politics” by Andrea Friedman discusses the hearsay nature surrounding Senator Joseph McCarthy. The 1950s generation believed in conventional heterosexual relationships. Allegedly Senator McCarthy was suppressing his sexual desire for men. An image was enough to spark gossip to romantically link Senator McCarthy to attorney Roy Cohn along with other allegations.
It showed me how corrupt people can think when they believe they aren’t corrupt and that what they are doing is honestly good for the people. It also helps me realize how the people back in the day could have been affected George W. Plunkitt and Tammany Hall. I believe the author did achieve his purpose in showing the world a system of political philosophy as stated in the preface. The writing is a bit motivating as is shows us George W. Plunkitt's many speeches on Tammany Hall and that we should support them. I believe that the book provides justice to George W. Plunkitt and Tammany Hall, mainly because the book is just George W. Plunkitt's speeches.
Response to Senator McCarthy’s “Enemies From Within Speech” With anti-communism being the dominant political issue during the Cold War, hysteria and paranoia spread throughout the minds of Americans. The “Enemies From Within Speech” delivered at Wheeling, West Virginia in 1950 by Senator Joseph McCarthy focused on worsening that national fear. Senator McCarthy used ethos, metaphor, and hyperbole to create the notion of disloyalty within the federal government. In order to persuade the American public in a convincing way, Senator McCarthy appeals to their ethics.
McCarthyism ended not to pose any real threat to the United States security, and the Salem witch hunts ended up to be all made up and found untrue. Both events grew in paranoia and destructiveness because they all stemmed off of some rumors they grew into huge problems. The Salem witch hunts intertwine with ideas of McCarthyism, since they both have so much in common with each other that in handily inspired Arthur Millers The Crucible. Without McCarthyism, Millers play most likely would have never happened, considering he would not have been inspired by anything else to write the
He was seen by some (mostly senators) as a harsh man solely
Most of these opinions are found and were formulated through letter writing. It is clear from these letters that the magazine had mixed reviews, with the majority of writers such as Hartley Coleridge and Thomas Carlyle believing that it was too politically driven (Sanders, I, P114). Therefore, it suggests that Blackwood’s preferred audience were middle to high class people as well as the politically right winged