The Federalists also wanted an alliance with Great Britain because they liked the way Great Britain saw radicalism in the French Revolution. They wanted a monarchy because that liked the way the British looked at thing. Hamilton wanted the government to be ran by rich people because they would make the government stronger and more educated. “...Alexander Hamilton believed that our new country 's federal government should be more powerful”
To begin with, Paine saw the need for a new and stable kind of government that promotes, represents, and unites American people. According to Paine it is mainly because of the people 's constitution that the British government is considered to be less oppressive compared to other European governments. Therefore, it is very important to recognize and consider the difference between society and government, especially monarchial, and their impacts on their communities. Paine argues that society affects people positively by uniting them and promoting their wellbeing. On the other hand, government by a king is rooted in an evil origin, and history has shown that it 's hereditary succession leads to foolish, wicked, and improper leaders, who
The First Amendment helps us to grow as a nation, to be better than our past and adapt to change. According to Polenski, “The very [First Amendment] freedoms themselves provide the means and mechanisms for our society to self-correct those challenges, perhaps a main reason why the First Amendment has endured, unchanged, since Dec. 15, 1791”. The Bill of Rights was a wise move. Our founding fathers saw that it was important to put these amendments in place because if the government is left uncheck, we could easily be like many other nations that are oppressed. The freedom to choose is the most powerful freedom we have.
Both the English Bill of Rights and Thomas Paine's Common Sense displayed interesting and creditable views regarding how to develop and maintain a well-functioning society through a well-structured government. The English Bill of Rights aligned a list of basic rights granted to individuals which included fair taxation and forbid cruel and unusual punishment. Common Sense is a well articulate essay that urges for the independence of the thirteen colonies from the British. In his text, Paine noted the importance of differentiating society and government, and condemned the practices of British monarchies (Paine, 62). Both documents theorized that political authority over the people should be fluid and well-constructed through a fair and equal governing body in order to ensure a equal and well-functioning society .
In both documents they address the fact that if the government does not meet the needs of the people, the people have the right to replace them. A second is the Colonies tried to reconcile with the king, but he was simply unsympathetic and unresponsive to the needs of the people. The king continued to take away their rights as humans and they had enough of it. And finally, Paine and Jefferson present their solution of
The enlightenment period, also called the age of reason, was a period between the 17th and 18th centuries in Europe that affected government and equality immensely. Religious, political, social, and economic equality became possible because of the ideas presented by these philosophers. Although the philosophers had variants with their ideas, they all pointed to equality. Documents A, B, C, and D, are perfect examples of how these philosophers had different views on equality. Total equality became possible because the philosophers argued and supported their points.
Parliament knew they could not rule without a king, so they decided to replace Charles. During the English Civil War, justice is best understood as doing what is right to protect the majority. King Charles had a different idea, he wanted to rule the majority to his advantage. Putting King Charles was both just and
The Founders included this principle of Separation of Powers in the Constitution because they wanted to make sure that no one faction had more power than another. Separation of Powers gives each of the three branches a specific power. For example, the Legislative power goes to congress, the Executive power goes to the President (and others of course), and the Judicial power goes to the Supreme Court. However, these separations can cause problems because one group could potentially gain too much control and overpower another branch. Therefore, to avoid a monarchy the Founders found it necessary to implement “Checks and Balances” on each branch.
While the French supported absolutism or the autocratic rule of their king, the English distributed equal power to the parliament as well as the king. These two uses of kings greatly affected the pace of modernization in their respective societies, absolutism proving to be less accelerated. Parliament also proved to remain strong in historical times where the king tried to overpower parliament. The second difference between French absolute monarchy and English monarchy was the stability that the government gave to the people. While the English government was separated into king and parliament, the French were at a major disadvantage if their king died in their absolute monarchy.
Our founding fathers had several goals, foremost among those goals was to avoid tyranny. In order to do this several different systems were set up to prevent the abuse of power. Federalism was one of these systems. Federalism was designed to balance the power of the national and State governments and thus limit the powers of the national government. Jefferson and others were convinced that state government was closer to the people and thus more democratic.Another system that was developed was the system of checks and balances.