ipl-logo

John M Barry Characterize Scientific Research

627 Words3 Pages

Sci‌‌entists ar‌‌e an u‌‌nusual bun‌‌ch of p‌‌eople. A pe‌‌rson ca‌‌n f ‌‌ịn‌‌d th‌‌em s‌‌currying arou‌‌nd lab‌‌s ‌‌ịn whit‌‌e, stark c‌‌oats or burrow‌‌ed underneath a pil‌‌e of dus‌‌‌‌ty boo‌‌ks. The‌se pe‌culiar specim‌ens ar‌e a ra‌re sighting, often avoidi‌ng the spotli‌ght of social at‌tention and ra‌‌‌‌‌ther immersing the‌m‌‌ selves in atomic theories or cellular structure. In contrary to this delusion, the author, John M.Barry characterizes scientific research as uncertain, persistent, and requiring great courage, countering the common misconceptions of science in the excerpt from The Great Influenza. Rebuffing the typical notion that scientists cling to certainty, Barry argues that the real scientists must accept the tenuous indeterminate

Show More
Related

  • Dangling Particles By Lisa Randall: Article Analysis

    242 Words  | 1 Pages

    In Dangling Particles, Lisa Randall argues that the lack of good communication between scientists and the public leads to misunderstandings and problems; therefore, communicating clearly and genuinely is essential for scientific development because science matters to all people. The use of terminology in scientific articles is the main factor leading to miscommunications. Many scientific articles use difficult terms that are unclear to common people because not everyone has a background in science. For instance, the term “Global Warming” had lead to many debates because people had thought that this meant the earth is getting warmer. That’s why the term was changed to “Climate Change” in order to avoid misunderstandings.

    Read More

  • The Great Influenza Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    712 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the passage from John M. Barry’s The Great Influenza, Barry makes us of an extended metaphor of scientific research as an unexplored wilderness, a motif of uncertainty, a comprehensible diction and admiring tone, and bookended explanatory paragraphs to characterize scientific research as a courageous pursuit to bring order from chaos. Throughout the piece, Barry develops the metaphor in a fashion which closely parallels the steps of the scientific method, giving the reader a better understanding of the work of scientists. In an effort to promote scientific research to the general public, he focuses on its positive aspects and the character traits of scientists. In order to appeal to a wide audience, Barry uses an extended metaphor to compare the seemingly abstract and unreachable concept of scientific research to the mentally attainable image of pioneers settling a virgin wilderness.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Great Influenza By John Barry

    925 Words  | 4 Pages

    In the book authored by John M. Barry, The Great Influenza, formulated about scientists who are expected to research factual theories and observations and their research. Throughout the passage, John Barry explained aspects and qualities of scientists. In addition, he also reveals the unfavorable possibilities of cursory research. The author of the novel explicates his belief of the qualities of a scientist and their research habits, stating that an authentic scientist is depicted as accepting to uncertainty and doubt, willing to explore the unknown, and working diligence. John M. Barry utilizes syntax and amplification, definitions, and examples to augment to his characterization of what a genuine scientist should be and to persuade the reader

    Read More

  • Heideggers Experiment, Rappaccini's Daughter, And The Birthmark

    508 Words  | 3 Pages

    Some think of science as advantageous, while others believe it can be immoral. Acts of science can lead to manipulation of the natural world and cause those performing the experiments to “play God.” Nathaniel Hawthorne 's short stories “Dr. Heidegger’s Experiment,” “Rappaccini’s Daughter,” and “The Birthmark” each incorporate characters that attempt to alter a natural aspect of life and in turn are met with failure. It is through his short stories that Nathaniel Hawthorne reveals opinion of science: Men should not engage in scientific studies that require them to act as God.

    Read More

  • Will Rodman And Frankenstein Comparison

    1192 Words  | 5 Pages

    Although scientific progress greatly benefits civilization, it also carries severe risks. For every penicillin, there 's a weaponized nuclear energy. Suffice to say, if left unchecked and without regulations, the human genius might create something which it simply cannot control. In a search for a scientific truth, man can unleash horror upon himself. “Mad scientists", men who disregard their safety and the safety of their surroundings to achieve their goal has become a staple of modern literature, almost a cliche.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Steven Shapin's The Scientific Revolution

    898 Words  | 4 Pages

    There were scientific findings before the 16th century and there were more to follow the 18th century. Shapin’s thesis covers that there was no specific scientific distinction between the 17th century and the rest of time for this period to stand out and be a revolution but he explains that the Scientific Revolution is more of a process. Shapin still believes that the scientific findings of this time can be considered revolutionary. Shapin explains that “Science remains whatever it is-certainly the most reliable body of natural knowledge we have got” (165) to show that he still understands how important science and the findings in science are to the world and civilization.

    Read More

  • Archetypes In Frankenstein Research Paper

    457 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, his ultimate failure serves as a warning against the dangers of overreliance on reason and progress. It highlights the need for a more holistic approach to scientific inquiry, one that takes into account the moral and ethical implications of scientific

    Read More

  • Henk Van Den Belt Frankenstein Quotes

    1424 Words  | 6 Pages

    The article discusses ways that “Frankenstein” should serve as a lesson and impact the actions of present-day scientists. Van Den Belt focuses on an overarching theme of the novel, which is the possible dangers of scientific exploration. He writes, “The story is commonly taken to imply a dire warning about the dangers of scientific hubris” (Van Den Belt). Victor Frankenstein, the main character of the novel, is an iconic example of a science experiment gone wrong. In many different aspects, the story should be studied by explorers to prevent the repetition of Frankenstein’s errors.

    Read More

  • Frankenstein God Quotes

    778 Words  | 4 Pages

    They never stop to ask if they should do something.... Discovery, they believe, is inevitable. So they just try to do it first. That's the game in science" (Crichton 1997: 294; my italics)” (Swart).

    Read More

  • Carl Sagan Rhetorical Analysis

    836 Words  | 4 Pages

    Does it matter?,” Carl Sagan beautifully and respectfully asserts the importance of favoring science over pseudoscience, and makes clear his argument as to why not the other way around. Sagan believes in the rhetorical connection between author and audience, which is why he maintains understanding throughout the essay. Sagan’s compassionate tone informs his polite authority, which in turn

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Marcelo Gleiser's Argument

    1010 Words  | 5 Pages

    The “Science” of Marcelo Gleiser’s Arguments Marcelo Gleiser is a physicist, author, and professor at Dartmouth who writes articles for NPR’s 13.7: Cosmos and Culture. His recent articles cover varied topics from the scientific method and ethics, to climate and technology, and even UFOs. Gleiser writes his articles so that he is the voice of reason, neither riling the most extreme nor the most skeptical science fan. His target audience appears to include both scientists and the average adult who cares for the future. Many science writers tend to be boring and give straight facts and knowledge, but Gleiser speaks more simply and appeals to those who are not necessarily as educated.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Descartes Discourse On Method

    1373 Words  | 6 Pages

    there is less perfection in works composed of several pieces and made by the hand of diverse masters than in those at which one alone has worked” (2, 1). Going back to the work of scientists—their work may be less perfect simply because they often work in teams, or they just build off of what is already known. The work they compose would be far more beneficial and valid if it were simply their own unique thoughts and discoveries that

    Read More

  • Summary Of Accidental Discoveries In Science By John Gale

    722 Words  | 3 Pages

    I argue that Gale presents a logical, convincing argument as to why accidental discoveries do not exist in science. In this essay, I will describe Gale’s definition of a discovery, and explain what he means by “accidental discoveries cannot be made in science.” Then, I will support this statement by using examples to demonstrate that accidental discoveries are indeed not possible. Gale claims that “discoveries can happen only to those whose conceptual systems are somehow prepared to recognize what it is that will be eventually discovered.”(pg.

    Read More

  • Conception Of Metaphysics

    1431 Words  | 6 Pages

    The conception that we might overturn the result of some thousands of years of rational analysis by discovering incipient scientific evidence is incredible, and a clear misunderstanding of the relationship

    Read More

  • Kant's 1962: The Structure Of Scientific Revolutions

    532 Words  | 3 Pages

    Prior to Kuhn’s 1962, “The Structure of Scientific Revolutions”, Karl Popper and Donald Campbell agreed the existence of specific thought processes derived from the evolutionary theory but, expanded their thinking when determining the scientific method is social (requiring language leading to social interactions which leads to rational endeavors or cognition), according to Wettersten (2016). This advanced from earlier thinking that scientists’ observations were the source of all knowledge (Wettersten). Thomas S. Kant (1962), on the other hand, felt the theories, facts, and methods scientists were compiling were neither historically organized nor were the scientists of a specific field, being educated in a rigorous and rigid manner. Kant believed that normal science problems did not lead to new findings, rather it was addressing only the theoretical side of science (Hacking, 2012) whereby research data was being made to fit in with the existing knowledge. Kant introduces

    Read More

More about John M Barry Characterize Scientific Research

Open Document