ipl-logo

John Maynard Keynes And Von Hayek: The Redistribution Of Wealth

898 Words4 Pages

In a time of great catastrophe, two great minds who come from different experiences will form a debate about their disparate economical ideas. John Maynard Keynes and Friedrich von Hayek were friends, but it is safe to say that they differed greatly with their views on the monetary system. In part 1 of the 3 part television series Commanding Heights, we see the world economy go back and forth from market economies to formulated and planned economies to back to a market economy. In this time of economic despair we come to learn the influential and distinct views of two great economist, Hayek and Keynes. Hayek was a from believer that the interest in markets is what potentially keeps production on point with at the same time people save which …show more content…

There are pros and cons when it comes to this subject and understanding them can help form an opinion. Some pros of income or wealth redistribution could include a sense of fairness, and how it sometimes has positive effects for the poor as well as the rich. It helps bring in the gap of economic wealth helping prevent inefficiencies in the economy. The redistribution of income is not a hot topic to some but it has some positive effects as long as money is properly spent and the percentage of poverty is weakened. As for the cons, it is said that the redistribution of income or wealth goes against what the American economy stands for in a sense of a free capitalism. It is sort of the opposite of the pros in a way. You see when redistribution is taking place, big businesses and the wealthy are unable to create businesses, and hire. It acts as a cinder block in a way that it can bring the economy down. One last note regarding cons is that many despise redistribution because they feel they are forced to give their hard earned money away and that it promotes laziness even. I personally find my view leading against income distribution for not only political reasons, but for economic reasons and how it can effect the aggregate …show more content…

Their ideas together can help maintain a stable economy at its equilibrium, but following them separated may lead to instability in the aggregate economy. Analyzing subjects such as inequality, minimum wage, and the pros and cons of wealth/income redistribution have broadened my understanding of the effects they can have on the economy as a whole. Learning about the way the macro economy functions can show one the many different ways of handling the economy there truly are and which policies/views can work best for the better of the overall

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Reagan And Friedrich Von Hayek

    146 Words  | 1 Pages

    United States President, Ronald Reagan, and United Kingdom’s Prime Minister, Margaret Thatcher, believed in the economic principles of Friedrich Von Hayek. They believed in free markets and free enterprise. They also believed that governments are not to interfere with the markets and the economy at all. Both leaders removed centralized planning of their economies. They also privatized state-owned businesses, markets, and allowed the markets to decide prices and regulate itself.

    Read More

  • The Liberals Taxing Policies By Jamie Golombek

    659 Words  | 3 Pages

    This gives the middle and lower class better access to benefits that are easily accessible to the wealthy such as money, health care that is not covered by the government, etc.. Although egalitarians believe in social and political equality in an ideal society, none have ever proposed that there should be absolutely no difference in income or wealth of the members of this society. In the same way liberals’ are not

    Read More

  • Hamilton's Blessing Book Analysis

    1298 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Twilight of the Old Consensus, ' ' Gordon provides a trace of the fiscal policy after the end of World War 1 and how it led to the shock experienced during the Great depression. Finally, in ' 'Keynesianism and the Madison Effect, ' ' Gordon argues that after the end of World War 2, economists relied on Keynesian deficit-spending theory to dictate fiscal and monetary policy. These chapters have been used to sum up the

    Read More

  • What Impact Did The Federal Reserve Have On The Economy

    1072 Words  | 5 Pages

    As Ronald Reagan once said, “There can be no security anywhere in the free world if there is no fiscal and economic stability within the United States.” This quote highlights the importance of economic stability in shaping the course of American history. Events such as the Civil War, the New Deal, and the creation of the Federal Reserve were all crucial in establishing and maintaining economic stability in the United States. These events have had a profound impact on the country’s economic landscape and continue to shape its future.

    Read More

  • Confronting Inequality Summary

    933 Words  | 4 Pages

    These benefits would be only be available to the lower and middle class, leaving the rich without benefits, thus creating income equality. This is not the only time the rich will not receive benefits, but the poor will as Krugman says an increased minimum wage will raise the social status of the poor. Raising of the minimum wage, at the time when the article was written, would allow the lower classes to bring in an increased income annually. The rich are then forced to pay their workers more, which means less money for the wealthy annually. This means the poor would make more money, the middle class would stay the same, and the rich would make less annually, therefore bringing income equality.

    Read More

  • Henry Paulson Great Depression Summary

    438 Words  | 2 Pages

    Economics is as much or more about confidence and psychology than it is about fancy macro or micro-economic theories. So here we are. Every time Henry Paulson opens his mouth, he spouts some more doom and gloom. The US and world economies are in ful fledge panic.

    Read More

  • Naked Economics Chapter 8 Summary

    493 Words  | 2 Pages

    In chapter 8, the core economic principle that displays itself often is The Consequences of Choices Lie in the Future. This principle presents the idea that what we are doing in today’s economy will have an impact on the future. Whether it is decisions on cutting benefits or raising taxes, any of these could cripple our futures economy. In the chapter, it discusses the fiscal policy and how it saved America’s economy after the depression. By monitoring the nation 's spending budget and taxes, so another depression or a recession does not occur.

    Read More

  • Effects Of Income Inequality In The United States

    1863 Words  | 8 Pages

    Effects of income inequality The impact of economic inequality affects a large part of the population in different ways. The most obvious effects of wealth inequality are that it creates social classes. The first subdivision that we can draw is that population is split in two categories: the rich and the poor. There are a variety of economic effects caused by income inequality. Wealthy people have a higher income and consequently spend less of each marginal dollar, which caused the economic growth to slow.

    Read More

  • Similarities Between Adam Smith And Karl Marx

    1093 Words  | 5 Pages

    The economic views of Adam Smith and Karl Marx Microeconomics Eduardo De Oliveira Superti   Table of Contents: Abstract 3 Introduction 4 The economic views of Adam Smith 5 The economic views of Karl Marx 6 Adam Smith vs. Karl Marx 7 Examples in the world of today 9 Conclusion 10 Recommendations 11 Bibliography 12 Introduction Adam Smith and Karl Marx were completely contrasting economists throughout their time and had an enormous effect on the world and the way we view economics. They represent the ideas of capitalism and socialism.

    Read More

  • The Upside Of Income Inequality Summary

    1016 Words  | 5 Pages

    In the story “The Upside of Income Inequality”, Gary S. Becker and Kevin M. Murphy effectively express’s the importance and need for income inequality in our society. Furthermore, Holly Ellyatt’s newspaper article Income Inequality: Is It Good For Everyone? serves to also point out that economic success and greater productivity is linked to “income inequality”. Although it may seem extremely unfair for someone to make up to two hundred and fifty times as much money as someone else, this notion of “income inequality” actually benefits the society as a whole by encouraging others to work much harder in life and better themselves and their education.

    Read More

  • Economic Inequality In America Essay

    856 Words  | 4 Pages

    America prides itself on being one of the most effective democratically governed counties. The idea of the American dream is that all people have equivalent political freedoms and a responsive government. However the effectiveness of social equality is being threatened by increasing inequality in the United States. Economic inequality in the US has expanded drastically. The wealth gap has had drastic changes over the past 35 years.

    Read More

  • The Pros And Cons Of Classical Economics

    791 Words  | 4 Pages

    The events of the 1980s and early 1990s do not appear to have been consistent with the hypotheses of either the monetarist or new classical schools. New Keynesian economists have incorporated major elements of the ideas of the monetarist and new classical schools into their formulation of macroeconomic

    Read More

  • Theories Of Adam Smith, David Ricardo And Karl Marx

    1537 Words  | 7 Pages

    Adam Smith, David Ricardo or Karl Marx are known for many as the pioneers of contemporary economies. Their Work and researches were the bases of most of nowadays economic models used by countries around the world. Adam Smith, David Ricardo and their followers were labeled as the classical economists when later on Karl Marx and his followers were labeled as the Marxists. These two economic schools were some of the biggest in history, but yet differed in many ways. Through this paper, we would discuss the says of the Classical and Marxism schools concerning their views on wages, their different opinions about the theory of value, their sides about capital accumulation and finally the different point of view of the schools regarding the diminishing returns.

    Read More

  • Comparing Adam Smith, Max Weber, And Karl Marx's Division Of Labor

    720 Words  | 3 Pages

    One of the most important concepts that defined the capitalist economy is the division of labor. Throughout the years, great philosophers such as Adam Smith, Max Weber, and Karl Marx have discussed theories that have drastically changed and molded the modern labor force. Thus, the ideal of labor division was created. Its purpose is to distribute labor skills amongst groups of people and by doing so it enabled workers to build products quickly. From this ideal, it allowed industries to expand their productivity and create trade on a global scale.

    Read More

  • Classical And Classical Economics: The 1929 Economic Crisis

    1116 Words  | 5 Pages

    1929 economic crisis, which is generally called as Great Depression, had upset the balance of world economic order. Until the depression, classical liberal economic theories were dominating World order. Classical economics is a supply oriented theory, claiming that whatever the level of supply, it is going to create its own demand in the market. If the free market determines the levels of prices, economy will always be in the situation of full employment. Accordingly, states should never interfere in the market.

    Read More

More about John Maynard Keynes And Von Hayek: The Redistribution Of Wealth

Open Document