ipl-logo

John Searle The Chinese Room Argument

1470 Words6 Pages

John Searle 1980(in Cooney, 2000), provides a thought experiment, commonly called the Chinese room argument (CRA), to show that computers, programmed to simulate human cognition, are incapable of understanding language. The CRA requires us to consider a scenario where Searle, who is illiterate in Chinese, finds himself locked in a room with a book containing Chinese characters. Additionally, he has a book containing a set of instructions written in English (which he understands), that allows him to match and manipulate the Chinese characters so that he can provide appropriate written responses (in Chinese) to incoming questions (also written in Chinese). Moreover, Searle has a pile of blank paper which he uses to write down his answers. Subsequently, Searle becomes so proficient in providing responses that the quality of his answers matches that of a native Chinese speaker. Thus, Searle in the CR functions as a computer would, where he is the system while the books are the program and the blank paper acts as storage.
Surely, we can conclude that Searle does not actually understand Chinese, but rather, he uses a set of rules, provided by the English instruction manual, to mix and match the Chinese characters, to give appropriate responses. Therefore, Searle functions in a syntactic (without meaning making) manner. Correspondingly, computers that perform operations, according to specific programming, do so in a syntactic way, and therefore, cannot understand language (Searle

Show More
Related

  • Tex G. Hall's Argument

    326 Words  | 2 Pages

    The author Tex G. Hall is explaining Native American team sports mascots are racist. He is testifying for many other people as well. He makes a very sensible are you and uses the motion and great facts facts. The way his argument is structured is very engaging. He first off thanks many people for bringing this controversy to everyone 's attention.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    432 Words  | 2 Pages

    Every day new technology is advancing to makes its way into the world where it is used more efficiently. In the article “Is Google Making Us Stupid?,”, Nicholas Carr claims that human are no longer able to focus on longer texts due to the rise of digital texts. Nicholas Carr includes strong evidences to support his statement; and through the usage of ethos and pathos, he is able to convince his readers that “the Net is becoming a universal medium” (Carr). Examples of Ethos are evident throughout the article making Carr’s argument deductively valid. Nicholas Carr is known for his reputation as someone who has written influential pieces and earning many awards for his accomplishments.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of 'Is Google Making USupid?'

    972 Words  | 4 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis In the article “Is Google Making us Stupid?”, author Nicholas Carr expresses his idea that the internet is taking over society and our thinking process. Google is affecting our abilities to read books, longer articles, and even older writings. Carr believes that we have become so accustomed to the ways of the internet, and we are relying on Google 's ability to sort through the details for us so we don 't have to, in order to get the information we find necessary more efficiently. He finds that this process has become almost too handy, and that it is corrupting us from becoming better educated.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    330 Words  | 2 Pages

    In the essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid?”, Nicholas Carr expresses his concern that the internet could be negatively affecting the way people think. He begins to argue his point by explaining his own issues of not being able to immerse himself in a book like he could before. Carr then reveals his suspicion that it’s the internet’s fault, and supports that by comparing his own experience to others. Reading is a common hobby for most of the people Carr compares experiences with. Like Carr, they found it difficult to read longer pieces of writing, and some blame the internet as well.

    Read More

  • Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    354 Words  | 2 Pages

    Nicholas Carr’s article titled Is Google Making us Stupid was written to deliver an urgent message to the reader. Carr’s purpose for writing this article was to inform the masses of the potential dangers in how new technologies change the ways our minds work. He is trying to warn us how writing has reduced our capability to remember details in our heads, just like the internet has been able to change the way our brains store, acquire, and handle information. The author makes the argument that Carr makes a reference to the movie 2001 A Space Odyssey. In his reference he tells the reader about the HAL computer who uncannily perfectly expresses human emotion, as it shares its concern that its data banks and artificial brain is being shut down

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    1504 Words  | 7 Pages

    Rhetorical Analysis (Is Google Making Us Stupid?) Over the years, search engines such as Google, have made it incredibly convenient to further our knowledge with just a touch of a button. In Nicholas Carr’s article “Is Google Making Us Stupid? What the Internet is Doing to Our Brains,” the focus is set on proving why the Internet is to blame for the typical American mind to think differently than it used to.

    Read More

  • William Golding Lord Of The Flies Argumentative Essay

    641 Words  | 3 Pages

    Lord of the Flies, written by William Golding, was about a group kids, from Britain, who had gotten on a plane, and the plane was shot down. Before it had crashed though, the group of children jumped off and survived. It was good they survived but now they are trapped on an island. Together they must work as a team to survive until they can be rescued.

    Read More

  • Cady Stanton's Argument Analysis

    255 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout history men have oppressed women taking away their rights and being treated as second class citizens. In 1848,at the Senca fallls convention the Declartion of sentiments was signed to gain equal .The Author Cady Stanton based the Declartion of sentiments on the Declartion of Independance and through the use of anaphora she conveys the idea that womenhave been oppresed and should have the same rights as any other citizen. Throughout the text Stanton uses anaphora to great extent to demonstrate the way women have been treated as second class citizens. There are many examples of this in the text,but one that shows that women had no voice is:”He has compelled here to submit to laws, in the formation of which she has had no voice.”

    Read More

  • Jack Lord Of The Flies Argumentative Essay

    882 Words  | 4 Pages

    Every child comes into this world as a selfish, manipulative, cruel and stubborn being. It is the parents and society that teaches children how to function in a civilized world, and societal laws that keeps them under control. William Golding wrote this novel in the early years of the cold war and the atomic age. In William Golding's classic novel Lord of the Flies, Golding uses Jack, a young savage who looks to lead a group of stranded kids on an island with no food, no rules, and no adults. The effect freedom has on Jack has turned him into a savage because he does not have to listen to anyone since there are no adults on the island.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

    1423 Words  | 6 Pages

    Yemisrach Reta ENG 121-340 Professor Ashley Waterman 11 pril 2017 Rhetorical Analysis of the Essay “Is Google Making Us Stupid” In “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Nicholas Carr uses some evidences in his argument in order to convince the idea of the other people . I believe Carr’s argument is effective because he starts explaining how he feels when he is reading a book and immersing himself in a book.

    Read More

  • Summary Of John Searle's Chinese Room Argument

    2029 Words  | 9 Pages

    Supporters of computationalism and strong artificial intelligence claim that computers are capable of intelligence and other cognitive states if they are programed correctly. Therefore, computers can explain how human cognition performs. I contend that John Searle is correct in his claim that computers are incapable of understanding language and are, therefore, unable to explain human cognition. I begin the essay with Searle’s Chinese room argument, and explain how he uses it to prove that computers cannot understand language as they operate on syntax alone, where syntax is insufficient in producing understanding. Thereafter, I provide a description of the robot reply to the Chinese room argument, which states that a robot with a computer insert and sensory apparatus would be able to achieve understanding, a view which Searle argues is still insufficient.

    Read More

  • Rhetorical Analysis Of Is Google Making USupid

    1311 Words  | 6 Pages

    Brainless.com: Rhetorical Strategies in Carr’s “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” Do we depend on the Internet to answer all of our questions? Nicholas Carr, an American author, wrote “Is Google Making Us Stupid?” published in 2008 in The Atlantic, and he argues about the effects of the Internet on literacy, cognition, and culture. Carr begins his argument with the ending scene of Stanley Kubrick’s 2001: A Space Odyssey.

    Read More

  • Douglas Eldridge's Rhetorical Analysis Essay

    1367 Words  | 6 Pages

    Introduction: The purpose of this analysis is to examine the rhetorical appeals of an argument presented by two different authors who have written on the topic of Artificial Intelligence. Douglas Eldridge’s, “Why the Benefits of Artificial Intelligence outweigh the Risks” provides the potential positives to the rise of Artificial Intelligence. He dispels some of the common myths regarding the risks of AI, suggesting that these myths are either unfounded or not so risky.

    Read More

  • Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis Analysis

    1376 Words  | 6 Pages

    The Whorf hypothesis highlights how the cognition concepts are shaped by language and thinking is limited if one does not know certain word for that specific language, their understanding for that matter will be hard and may be differ from the actual meaning that has been presented (Fantini, 2010). It is impossible for one to think outside of their language as it necessitates how one thinks and they are bound with the language. This subject matter can be relate with the uses of word in forming a sentence or it can be called as morphology. People have to know the meaning of the word they used in other to send the message with the actual meaning towards someone. If the words used are not bringing the exact meaning as from what the person wants to say, it might lead to the misinterpretation from the one who receives the message and the way the message receiver understanding will differ from what he or she should

    Read More

  • Watson's Theory Of Behaviorism

    705 Words  | 3 Pages

    In its most general sense, Behaviorism, also known as behavioral psychology, is a theory of learning developing as a result of the ideas and beliefs shared by a group of people who has influenced educators’ view of learning. The term behavioral psychology refers to a psychological approach which principally concerned with stimulus-response activities and emphasizes the role of environmental factors in a learning process, to the exclusion of own free will. There is a tenet of behavioral psychology that “only observable, measurable, an outward behavior is worth investigating” (Bush, 2006, p. 14). Historically speaking, behaviorism was originated in the 1880s and develops gradually in the twentieth-first century and beyond. Skinner and

    Read More

More about John Searle The Chinese Room Argument

Open Document