ipl-logo

John Stuart Mill's Case: Family Ties And Business Ethics

1599 Words7 Pages

Blood and Morality In the case titled "Family Ties and Business Ethics", it describes a father who did all that it took to make his ship-building business flourish, including cutting corners and sacrificing time away from his family. This did not make him happy, and due to an accident, he lost two of his sons, and this made him even more unhappy and hardened him. He treated everyone in the business including Lucy, his own daughter, with an overbearing nature which caused tension, but this business was one of the few options that Lucy had to put herself through school. She left to seek work at another company that also built ships, and she was very successful; however, one day her company received a bid from her father, and she was sent as …show more content…

Mill argues that Utilitarianism is not just to seek the happiness of the agent, but to all those that are involved in the action(Mill 18), and in Lucy's case the people involved are those stated earlier. This shows that Lucy must make a choice that serves the greatest good, and by accepting her father's offer, she is betraying her entire company and essentially making herself unhappy as well because it is against her beliefs to be doing so and therefore this shows that there is not much good if she chooses this scenario as compared to if she chooses to deny her father wherein there will be a maximization of the good. Another assertion that Mill makes is regarding expediency in which he states that people often believe that Utilitarianism allows for people to do whatever they want that will get them short term gain and happiness, but actually they are not benefiting, as in the long term it will not be what is best for them and will not bring them happiness(Mill 22). Applying this to Lucy's situation, her father is in want of short term gain by taking a short cut in asking his daughter to leak information to him and this therefore will lead to unhappiness for her father as people will perceive him to be a cutthroat cheater, and if Lucy chooses to do this she will also be unhappy in the long run as her reputation would have been ruined and other companies will not want to hire her. This shows that if Lucy takes up her father's offer, she will then have not chosen the choice that would lead to her and her father's greater happiness by being expedient. Lastly, Mill states that justice is actually very essential in Utilitarianism, although not readily apparent, and

Show More
Related

  • Did Frederick Douglass's Freedoms To Have Taken Away From His Family

    1100 Words  | 5 Pages

    She was sold by her mother thinking that she would help the family and have a better life;

    Read More

  • The Argument Against Seaman Holmes

    171 Words  | 1 Pages

    However, according to the utilitarian standpoint he did make an action that created the most happiness for the majority of those on the boat so the verdict was wrong in regard to this concept. Determining whether or not the verdict against Seaman

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill's Argumentative Essay

    1224 Words  | 5 Pages

    Whether it is at the dinner table or in my family’s group text message, the conversation about my brother’s custody battle with my mother’s side of the family seems to remain a bitter topic, especially when discussing my role in it. When my father physically harmed my brother to the extent to which he had to go to the emergency room, the custody trial over my brother and me began. After several sources provided the judge with accusations against my father, I was the final source that needed to assert or deny my father’s abuse; with heavy consideration, I decided to lie to the judge by denying my father’s abuse. Under the principle of utilitarianism, philosophers would infer that lying is permissible if the consequences of doing so are good.

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism: John Stuart Mill's Arguments

    270 Words  | 2 Pages

    Utilitarianism would look at this situation as a wrongful action. According to teleological created by John Stuart Mill the action that happens is based of the good that comes from said action. In this case Payne’s action while arresting Ms. Wobbles would go against teleological due to being negative in nature and doing more harm then good for either parties involved. According to Jeremy Bentham the goodness of the action is based on the consequences of the action that is made. I believe that Payne does deserve to be terminated from the department and rightfully tried in court for all the departmental policies that were broke during the arrest of Ms. Wobbles.

    Read More

  • How Does Dr Myrick Fit The Tenets Of Utilitarianism

    695 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the film Extreme Measures, Dr. Myrick does not fit the description Mill’s idea of Utilitarianism; however, he is able to demonstrate some tenets of Utilitarianism. To begin with, Dr. Myrick is able to ignore societal ethics in order to accomplish his goal of curing paralysis, drastically improving the quality of life for many. In doing so, Dr. Myrick fits the Principle of Utility; the Principle of Utility is the theory that the right choice is the one that gives the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest amount of people. Dr. Myrick believes that by sacrificing a few people, who’s quality of life is lower than the rest, he can do lots of good which will outweigh the immorality of his actions. Although he never accomplished his goal

    Read More

  • Compare Mill Utilitarianism

    73 Words  | 1 Pages

    In retrospect, I can resonate more with Mill’s utilitarianism. I would rather kill one person than five. I believe if I chose to be selfish and save a loved one, I would be looked down upon. To carry the weight of knowing that you could have saved lives, would most likely be a haunting experience. I would not want the families of the victims to endure the pain of losing a loved one.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill Happiness Is Better Than Lower Pleasures

    933 Words  | 4 Pages

    I will agree with Mill and argue that higher pleasures are better than lower pleasures. In Mill’s essay, he defines Utilitarianism: ‘’actions are right in the proportion as they tend to promote happiness; wrong as they tend to produce the reverse of happiness. By happiness is intended pleasure and the absence of pain; by unhappiness, pain and the privation of pleasure’’ (Mill, 7). Therefore, Utilitarianism according to Mill considers actions to be right or wrong based on whether or not they make humans happy.

    Read More

  • John Stuart Mill Individual Liberty

    1035 Words  | 5 Pages

    Moreover, Mill’s says that he uses “Utility as the ultimate appeal [to] all ethical questions” (Mill 20), which is used to determine the individual liberty that we

    Read More

  • Examples Of Soft Paternalism

    2380 Words  | 10 Pages

    Soft paternalism supports the criminalisation of drug usage because the action and effects of drug usage fulfils the two necessary elements which justify state interference according to soft paternalism. The criminalisation of drug usage represents a mechanism through which the state justifiably limits the liberty of individuals on the basis that a person’s “decision making capacity is compromised by cognitive and emotional deficiencies” (Wertheimer 2002, 50) as a result of a drug usage. This essay will discuss how drug usage extensively compromises the mental faculties and inherent rationality of human beings to the extent that the action of taking drugs may no longer be considered voluntary or validly consented to. Furthermore the idea that

    Read More

  • Mill Utilitarianism Essay

    454 Words  | 2 Pages

    Damian Howard-Doney Philosophy 101 MWF Professor Hassell 9 March 2015 Mill The purpose of this essay is to critique Mill’s idea of utilitarianism.

    Read More

  • Summary Of Bernard Williams A Critique Of Utilitarianism

    1565 Words  | 7 Pages

    Williams transitions from this example into the discussion of something he calls “the precedent effect”. The fear of this effect is that certain horrendous utilitarian acts might encourage people to behave immorally because of the precedent that may be set by these actions. Even though Williams admits that the precedent effect would only occur if people where confused as to why utilitarian’s had to commit a horrendous act, Williams believes that this confusion is a very real possibility if utilitarianism is ever used in

    Read More

  • Utilitarianism In Business Ethics

    1685 Words  | 7 Pages

    The hedonic calculus has seven different criteria that must be considered to evaluate the balance between good and evil. This appears practical and easy to use in any situation; however, it has its issues. For example, Bentham suggested that all pleasure and pain should be measured equally. This causes a major problem when put into the context of business ethics, as it suggests that the pain experienced by a child forced to work in a factory is equal to a shareholder in a business gaining a little more profit – surely, this is unethical. J.S. Mill noticed this issue, introducing rule utilitarianism, in which he recognised the differences in different types of pleasures.

    Read More

  • Immanuel Kant's Theory Of Maxim

    582 Words  | 3 Pages

    In the book it stated this, “According to Utilitarianism, our duty is to do whatever will increase the amount of

    Read More

  • Kant's Ethics Vs. Utilitarian Ethics

    1023 Words  | 5 Pages

    He says that one must act not only in accordance to duty, but for the sake of duty However, According to the Utilitarianism, Mill emphasizes that the actions are right in proportion as they tend to promote happiness Immanuel Kant is the founder of the Kantian branch of ethics and morality, and his theories are personally my favorite theory of ethics so far. According to the utilitarianism, the best action is the one that maximizes utility. However, in Kant’s moral philosophy, people

    Read More

  • Spotless Mind Movie

    1760 Words  | 8 Pages

    Eternal sunshine of the Spotless Mind is a movie that deals with many different ethical issues involving memory loss. The movie is shown in a backwards fashion about the relationship of Joel, and Clementine. Joel and clementine meet (again) , after having their memories erased by Dr.Mierzwiak. Joel finds out a few days later after going to Barnes and Noble that Clementine had Joel erased from her memory after a big fight.

    Read More

More about John Stuart Mill's Case: Family Ties And Business Ethics

Open Document