John Taylor Gatto Sir Ken Robinson Analysis

1082 Words5 Pages
Compare and Contrast “John Taylor Gatto and Sir Ken Robinson” Essay In the United States, public education is required for all students from kindergarten through 12th grade. All children in the United States have access to free public schools. Public schools were funded in whole or in part by taxation. Likewise, funding comes from the state, local, and federal government. Generally, the responsibility of public schools is to train all students to excel as educated, responsible, global citizens. There are challenges facing the system of public schools in the United States and these drew the attention of John Taylor Gatto and Sir Ken Robinson. Both of them valued the importance of education in the life of students, especially those who attend…show more content…
Robinson showed a rethink about the education system in the United States and he pondered on the present situation of our educational system that is not working right. He mentioned that every country on earth today is restructuring public education. Robinson argues that education restructuring is for economic reasons. He explains people are trying to work out an attempt to educate our children to take place in the economies. In addition, education modernization is for cultural reasons. At this point, people were trying to keep their cultural identity while still being involved in"the process of globalization."According to Robinson, the dropout rates of schoolchildren are increasing substantially.The schools are more interested in the arts and dwindling; the school system find means to alienate millions of kids who do not see any purpose in going to school. Robinson related this to the increase in the cases of Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder (ADHD). The modern epidemic in America was to give improper medications to students because students could not focus on boring school lectures that do not attempt to occupy them. In addition, He wants the listeners to understand that kids are not successful under the current system. Robinson considered the model of learning and…show more content…
Gatto did not see any benefit in children attending public schools. He foresees that those who are homeschooled would learn much more than those who attend public school. Conversely, Robinson in his argument was leaning towards what we can benefit if we reform public education in our country as done in every country on earth. He concluded that in the current educational standard, we are trying to meet the future by doing what they did in the past. By so doing, the system of education alienates millions of kids who do not see any purpose in going to school. Furthermore, one similarity Gatto and Robinson shared is the effect of schooling on students’ morals. Gatto referred to Prussian system in his discussion, an old idea of compulsory schooling as a system that can influence the morals, and make children fulfill their potentials. Likewise, Robinson pronounced that kids are not successful under the current system of education in our country because education is being reformed. For example, cases of ADHD are on the increase.Our children are living in the most intensely stimulating period in the history of the earth because these kids ended up being medicated as routinely as we have our tonsils taken out. As a final point, Gatto recommended that kids with plenty of solitude would learn to enjoy their own company and make a more meaningful life. Meanwhile,

More about John Taylor Gatto Sir Ken Robinson Analysis

Open Document