These three men were so personally close to Lincoln, as well as his wife Mary. Stoddard was better in handling the “difficult” and “moody” Mary Lincoln. While Hay and Nicolay would called her such nicknames, Stoddard was usually the one to calm down Mary. Throught the presidency of Lincoln, each man would write to various newspapers; however, Nicolay and Hay wrote a book about Lincoln. One thing shown throughout the whole book that the author tried to convey was that Lincoln trusted them completely and they were aware of all confidential information.
Two famous explorers that both explored the Yellowstone National Park. And its harsh weather and one of the explorers back then exploring undiscovered. The similarities these two impacting the future of the park. These men have differences to make the park as it is now and what time difference then had. These brave men are John Colter and Tom Murphy, in at different time changed Yellowstone.
In the excerpt the mooallem explains a northern military fort that was known as “the polar bear capital of the world”. with its newfound title came tourists. And with the uprising in tourism comes with the rise in destruction. The author makes a very strong and and almost emotional connection not only to himself but the the polar bears
Compare and Contrast Essay Adam Shepard’s project had more of a purpose to prove to Americans. His journey provided evidence that the American Dream is achievable in a reasonable amount of time. Chris wasn 't trying to be admirable, but was just trying to live unsophisticated, with no regards or concern for anyone else. Throughout the two exploits both Adam and Chris had very different motivations.
Our encounter with the Black Feet Indians was very hostile. Only because Lewis had mistaken them for the Atsina tribe. Now the tribe lived I T-Pees and canopies type homes. They would actually put buffalo fur on the sides of their homes to stop wind and keep them warm. There original residents where the Northern Plains.
Samantha Hoppe – The Minority is Not Minor The United States of America, formed by immigrants of various nationalities, was founded by white men who believed themselves better than others. That attitude was then passed on through the generations. It is depicted in a majority of Western texts primarily because the Western genre is set in the time period when the Wild West thrived, and Indians were the enemy. Little House on the Prairie (1935) written by Laura Ingalls Wilder and Django Unchained (2012) directed by Quentin Tarantino sway from traditional Westerns and give Indians and African Americans, respectively, some credit.
A recurring theme throughout these short stories is survival, and the protagonist typically does not achieve this goal. Survival on the frontier is not easily achieved, as Jack London knows all too well. He and his family took part in the gold rush during the early 1900’s, getting first hand experience with the things he writes about. “To Build a Fire”, one of London’s more popular stories, focuses on a man traveling through the Yukon Valley with only an unfriendly dog as a
Alexie does a good job depicting the life of his people through the realness of his writing from the alcoholism to the relationships on his reservations. Although the story uses Pathos to create relationships and Logos to describe his Native culture, “This is What it Means to Say Phoenix Arizona” is filled with Ethos which allows the audience to engage and relate with the content easily. The story begins with the disheartening news of the main character, Victor 's fathers ' death. At just a young age Victor 's father left him and his mother to Arizona where he ultimately died.
The push towards the western frontier led to various forms of environmental and people push. These and the skirmishes with Indian Modified Turner thesis. Young Jedidiah Smith, a Methodist clerk from Ohio led a fur-trading up the Missouri river to Yellowstone and beyond. This steady move led them away from European influence to an American experience of their own political, economic and social independence of American history. Fur traders were followed by railroad mining and timber companies, gold rush and various other enterprises who had control over them.
Very interesting read even if you believe you know something about the Oregon Trail. Buck 's descriptions of both his trip and the events during the Great Migration really bring crossing the trail to life. After finishing the book, you seriously feel like spending a few days with Buck and his brother traveling along in a covered wagon. I would have liked a few more maps to help indicate where they were during some of the scarier moments of the
Both Thoreau and King rely heavily on ethos to get their points across. The intended audience of both is similar; a group of people with similar morals as the writers, but who have neglected action for various reasons. King also appeals to pathos, describing the plight of the colored man vividly. King’s audience is largely aware of this situation already, but he uses it to drive them to action rather than simple awareness. On the other hand, Thoreau appeals little to pathos, focusing instead on logic and ethics.
Thematic and metaphoric contrasts in Dilruba Ara´s ”Detached Belonging”. Dilruba Ara´s novel, ”Detached belonging”, explore the complex relationship between personal experiences and cultural integrity, particularly in regard to the protagonist view of family and location differences. Thematic and metaphor contrasts are used by the author to describe the main events and the character´s emotional state in this story. The writer manages to convey the emotional state of the protagonist through narrative functions that often shows contrast. Even though there are many ways to tell a story, it is a well-known fact that by using images, symbols, and metaphors, so-called narrative functions, the author increases the ability to reach out to the reader and enhance the reader´s experience and empathy of a story.
Hello Cimberleigh, Thank you for sharing your post! I appreciated reading your hypotheses about what you saw in the paintings. It was interesting to review other responses and see how different people view and draw various conclusions from the same images. For example, in the first image you saw isolation whereas I saw someone being methodical, not necessarily thinking about anything in particular, but contemplating. From my perspective, the person may have been thinking about positive and negative things, but without additional information I didn’t feel comfortable drawing conclusions.