Should someone be convicted of murder even if they did it to protect themselves and their friends or should they remain guilty? In the fictional novel The Outsiders written by S.E. Hinton there are two main rival gangs, The Socs and The Greasers. One night Johnny Cade and Ponyboy Curtis were at a park Far East and the socs came and they fought. While they were fighting Johnny took a 6 inch switchblade and stabbed Bob in the back. This resulted o in the death of Bob. Johnny Cade should not be convicted of murder.
One reason why Johnny Cade is innocent and should not be charged of murder because he killed bob in self defense. Before Johnny killed Bob the Socs were drowning Ponyboy in a fountain and they were drunk and weren’t in a good state
Imagine your friend had lead you into the woods and stabbed you 19 times throughout your body. Anissa and her friend Morgan alledgy stabbed another 12 year old 19 times after leading her into the woods in order to please a fictional character. Morgan and Anissa should be tried as adults with lower sentences and therapy because of the severity of the crime, her age, and her mental health. The two friends should be tried as adults with lower sentence because of how serious the crime was.
S. E. Hinton 's novel The Outsiders, Hilton includes two characters that only care for eachother. They have many similarities, they both have abusive parents and they both place little value on their lives. However they have many differences. Dally gets in trouble a lot with the fuzz, johnny on the other hand is shy, always looks like something is bothering him. Johnny ends up dying but he dies a hero, Dally dies a hoodlum, he attempts to pull a unloaded gun on the fuzz but dies as soon as he does it.
Johnny Cade is Innocent and here is why. Johnny is innocent because he was acting in self-defense and in defense of Ponyboy. The Socs were going to drown Ponyboy and Johnny did the only thing he could have done. Johnny was being held up and Ponyboy was being drowned so Johnny was sick of being a coward so he did what would save Ponyboy. This supports
Cade reacted to this by taking a switchblade and suddenly killing Robert leaving a pool of blood near him. As one can state, Johnny Cade should not be charged with manslaughter
In my opinion, I believe that Phillips should have been convicted of felony murder, even when the underlying felony was grand theft by false pretenses. Principally, grand theft is when the committed value of the property taken is worth more than a minimum amount. I believe Phillip’s shouldn’t be convicted of grand theft, but should have been charged with felony murder. Linda Epping was an eight-year-old child, who had a fast growing, and rare eye Cancer, that required surgery for survival. He should have been imprisoned of murder because he advised that Laura shouldn’t go through with the surgery, and that he could cure her without surgery.
The debate of whether killing for good reasons can be allowed has always been a popular topic for decades. In the book, The Outsiders, several killings have occurred, including Johnny’s killing of the Socs who intend to drown Ponyboy and the ultimate killing of Dally by the police. After considering all the factors that eventually lead to these killings, it is undoubtable that there is never a good reason to kill, given the reasons that it will directly result in deep pain in some people and there are always ways that can solve the problems instead of killing. First of all, killing should not ever be allowed for it generates great pain on people. If an action strongly affects a massive amount of people, whatever reasons are present behind it, this kind of action should be eliminated.
“Greasers will still be Greasers and Socs will still be Socs” pg.117 -Randy, “The Outsiders”. “The Outsiders” was written by S.E. Hinton. In this novel, we are introduced to two characters with very similar characteristics, however, they also displayed many other personality traits that were very opposite as well. Dally was a Greaser, who always got in trouble. Bob was a Soc, who got away with whatever he wanted .
”(pg.55) This piece of evidence shows that Bob is the leader of their group because he gave David an order. This shows that if you kill Bob, the others will scatter or freak. Therefore, he killed Bob on purpose and with intent. Another valid point on why Johnny Cade should be charged with second degree murder is because of what Johnny said to Ponyboy Curtis, one of his closest friends, soon after the incident “I had to.
If you killed someone for self defence would you think you could go to jail? In the book The Outsiders by S.E Hinton a 16 year old boy killed named Johnny that has been horribly beaten up a 18 year old guy who was dangerously attacking another greaser, Ponyboy. The Socs and Bob was attacking the Greasers, he was drowning Ponyboy up to where he couldn't breath so Johnny quickly made a move and killed him before Bob killed Ponyboy. Johnny should not go to jail he was still alive because he was only using self defence. Johnny should not be charged with murder because .
On Tuesday November 12, 1963 Ponyboy Curtis and Johnny Cade go missing after the scene of Bob Sheldon’s murder. The two boys were seen running by the the park just before the incident, witnesses say that there had been a gang fight including Curtis, Cade, and Sheldon. Police believe Curtis and Cade are on the run because of the devastation last night. Police caution everyone in the area of Tulsa of Ponyboy Curtis and Johnny Cade as we are unaware if they are armed with weapons.
The capital murder trial of Hollis Alvin Daniels has started at the Lubbock County Courthouse downtown. Daniels’ case is being presided over by the Honorable John “Trey” J. McClendon in the 137th district court according to the Lubbock County website. Daniels is on trial for the capital murder of Texas Tech police officer, Floyd East Jr, according to the Lubbock Police Department. Daniels was apprehended by Texas Tech PD on Oct. 9, 2017, near the Lubbock Municipal Coliseum after he fled the police department according to a Lubbock Police press release. Where he stated that he did “something illogical” and he was the one that shot their friend as the officers took him into custody according to the affidavit.
Hook: Would you ever convict an innocent boy who acted out of defense of himself and his friend of murdering person who constantly attacks him? The answer should be no. Background information: Known as his “greaser gang’s” pet, Johnny Cade grew up in a household with no role models. Not only was he constantly bullied at home, he was attacked outside as well. Johnny was continuously being assaulted by Socs looking for trouble and he would never fully recover from the trauma in which he has been through.
He also is not guilty because he cannot tell the difference between fantasy and reality, and he cannot control his own morals. So, why not give this man a second chance? Everyone deserves
OJ Simpson is Indeed Innocent “If it doesn’t fit, you have to acquit,” this quote said by one of OJ Simpson’s attorneys, Johnny Cochran, is widely known for its impact on the controversial case of OJ Simpson. From 1994-1995 OJ Simpson was known as one of the most controversial cases in the USA due to the verdict that OJ was innocent of the murders of his ex wife and one of her friends. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown Simpson and Ron Goldman met an untimely demise, and the only suspect the police ever reviewed was OJ Simpson. OJ was later caught in a low speed chase in a white Ford Bronco before being taken into custody and put on trial. In the sensationally controversial court case involving OJ Simpson as a suspect for murder, The innocent ruling
Ladies and gentleman of the jury, Jonathan Andrew Cade is not guilty of murder. Johnny Cade was just 16 when he died. A mere boy, who went through a lot in his short years of existence. Johnny lived in an abusive household, and in his family he went unnoticed and uncared for. He felt he was not really part of his family- an outcast.