07/2015 JOINT LEADERSHIP COURSE
Individual Graded Essay
The advantages of joint warfare are best optimised by creating “one joint service” rather than integrating different services. Discuss.
( 1098 words)
Hawk Syndicate
Index No. H043
“The advantages of joint warfare are best optimized rather than integrating different services because the joint commander has the command over the different services and the range of capabilities that no single service can provide.”
Introduction
Joint warfare means forces from a country 's Army, Navy and Air are forms to work together employed under command relationship, rather than planning and executing military operations separate from each other. Integration of different services was started
…show more content…
The army, navy, air operations, fusion and intelligence collection, including logistics and communications that bring altogether the talents of more than one service. The fusion of information and logistics will further enhance any operation to provide rapid crisis response and deliver customise logistics packages directly to the strategic, operational, and tactical level of operations.[6]
Joint warfare analysis, which is done together with the various services at one place, is an important part of joint warfare as the information gathered can be used to support planning, real-time and post exercise force assessment, extrapolation of force capabilities, and alternative force evaluations. Gathering and sharing of this information (usually from a single service) provide joint operations planners, analysts and engineers, and users with invaluable insight into operational decision making which is important in any
…show more content…
[6][11]
Conclusion
In this essay, the various advantages and disadvantages of joint warfare are discussed. The advantages enable the joint commander to have a full range of capabilities when the various service join in a joint warfare and it will definitely increase lethality and synergy of the operation. The fusion of information and logistics will further enhance in any operation to provide rapid crisis response, to track and shift assets, and to deliver tailored logistics packages directly to the operations.[7]
On the contrary, the biggest challenge for the joint commander is to synchronise the doctrines from the different services and able to align the communication systems to overcome the disadvantages. This will tremendously improve operational efficiency in achieving objectives and minimising causalities, therefore, the important advantages of joint warfare can be best optimised rather than integrating different services as the joint commander has the command over the different services and the range of capabilities that no single service can
The ROMO looks at a wide variety military operations that ranges from security cooperation, crisis response, and major operations and campaigns. Operational reach is the distance that a military force can employ their military capabilities into combat operation. The majority U.S. Army forces will have to conduct Reception, Staging, Onward movement, and Integration operations before a major operation. The U.S. Air Force and U.S. Navy operational reach extended further than the U.S. Army. It was important to understand the capabilities of our Sisters Services and Special Operation Forces.
SRM will lessen the swings in unit manning by increasing the total army efficiency by increasing the availability and efficiency of the reserve components. The Army though implementation of SRM is cracking down on maintenance management and supply discipline. Excess supplies that were common to the ARFORGEN model must have better visibility. Commanders must carefully manage their resources to maximize their equipment efficiency through visibility and better maintenance.
Analyzing the mission command principles and the commanding officer’s actions will also be discussed. Specifically, as it relates to building a cohesive team through mutual trust, providing a clear commander’s intent, and accepting prudent risk. While the battle of Fort Riviere and the resulting occupation of Haiti occurred over a century ago, it provides us with an example of American foreign policy during this period and bares resemblance to future American military
Introduction Operation Anaconda was the largest battle in the initial invasion of Afghanistan. The planning of the operation proved to be complex, especially in dealing with multi-unit joint operations. Despite the limited time for planning, limited multi-unit interoperability, and lack of resources, Organizational Management functions played an essential role in the successful execution of Operation Anaconda. Planning and Organizing Joint Special Operations
Operation Anaconda. Lessons for Joint Operations. Ft. Belvoir: Defense Technical Information Center. Retrieved from http://www.dtic.mil/dtic/tr/fulltext/u2/a496469.pd United States.
The CJCS also outlines and writes the National Military Strategy provided to Combatant Commanders as military context and translation of the National Defense
Partially due to a lack of trust amongst various intelligence agencies, information was not shared, and as a result the Americans were caught off guard by an attack that they knew was going to happen. The lack of unity and communication amongst groups caused the failure at Pearl Harbor, and it almost cost them victory at the Battle of Midway, often seen as the turning point in the Pacific War. It can be assumed that the collaboration of intelligence agencies is responsible for the United States’ overall success in the Pacific. In order to prove that collaboration of intelligence is responsible of Allied naval success, this paper will examine the lack of collaboration that led to the failure at Pearl Harbor, the solutions which allowed for success at the Battle of Midway, and how the Allied forces continued to improve team work after the
Gen. Daniels priorities and vision of an ever-changing Global Theater and how my unit and myself can be a part of the solution by moving from metrics to actual Unit readiness. Given that this workshop would be a combination of a variety of our NATO allies , I would attempt to network with other officer and attendees and professionals in our field to share ideas and build professional relationships that can benefit not only myself but possibly provide Lt. Gen. Daniels with another highly trained and motivated unit leader to allow her to accomplish her goals she has set for those under her command Lt. Gen. Daniels specifically mentions in her paper that “ Lower echelon leaders need to be able to focus on achieving readiness.”, which by attending this workshop and gaining the experience needed to really implement the change the CG is striving for , especially at a lower echelon level. The simple fact is, knowing what Lt. Gen. Daniels has set as his priorities for herself ,and the organization, she is in command of will allow me to create an action plan and set clear goals on how I can absorb as much information as possible in the limited amount of time to best benefit and implement the CG’s priorities and my Platoon and Unit
Joint Planning for Operation Anaconda SFC Spurlock, Matthew MLC Class 005-18 Joint Planning for Operation Anaconda Since the beginning of the Global War on Terrorism, there have been numerous battles. One of the most important battles that shaped future joint planning of operations was Operation Anaconda. The outcome of this operation was ultimately successful, however, the original intent from the commanders were not met due to errors in the joint planning process. Joint planning during Operation Anaconda proved ineffective because of inaccurate intelligence about the terrain and weather, the exemption of Air Force and Navy during the initial planning phase, and false assumptions about the enemy. Intelligence Intelligence Preparation
SUBJECT: Information Paper 1. Purpose. To summarize the important parts of the Army White Paper, The Profession of Arms, dated 08DEC10, for the Battalion Commander of 1-22 Combined Arms Battalion (CAB). 2. Facts.
The US military plays a major role in the defense system of the world. Their role can be in the form of military aid, deployment of the military and deployment of the Coast Guards and the protection of people’s lives and freedom. The US is well known for providing military aid to many different countries. The aim of military aid is usually to help allies or poor countries to fight terrorism, counter-insurgencies or to help fight drug wars.
These aspects of equipment and record keeping also affect the functional planning of the U.S. Army. Using a wartime scenario, a Commanding Officer needs to know precisely the amount of equipment on hand, including weapons and ammunition, in order to properly plan an operation. Proper planning, in this sense, ensures that the operation is conducted sufficiently and no lives are
Time management in the military Eddie White DI Page Time management in the military Time management is very important as any organization or individual who want to achieve his/her goals must strictly observe time. Time management requires someone to prioritize some tasks in some way; one should label some tasks as more imp01iant than others. The key factor in effective time management is usually accuracy because when you have accurate model of reality you are in a position to determine which task is more important than other. You can only realize the real gains in time management at the top but not at the bottom. Inaccurate understanding of reality can make your missions, goals and your projects to be meaningless
Beyond Command and Control, the joint functions include intelligence, fires, movement and maneuver, protection, sustainment, and information. As the largest operation in WWII up until that time, Operation Husky was a proving ground for integration of joint function. Given the command and control struggles, it follows that joint integration in Operation Husky was less than optimal, especially because “joint force components have different function-oriented approaches, procedures, and perspectives.” Presented below are examples of how shortcomings in intelligence and movement and maneuver resulted in lost momentum or lost opportunity for the
A complex system is any system composed of multiple parts, each of which must act individually according to its own circumstances and which, by so acting, changes the circumstances affecting all the other parts. A battle between two military forces is itself a complex system (Waldrop, 1992; Lewin, 1992; Kelly, 1994). The fundamental point is that any military action, by its very nature a complex system, will exhibit messy, unpredictable, and often chaotic behavior that defies orderly, efficient, and precise control. The approach to command and control must find a way to cope with this inherent complexity. While a machine operator may be in control of the machine, it is difficult to imagine any commander being in control of a complex phenomenon like war.