Into Thin Air By Jon Krakauer Into Thin Air is a non-fiction and adventure book that details the disaster that occurred in 1996 at Mount Everest, and it started as a magazine article. The book is a personal account of the author Jon Krakauer, a professional writer and mountaineering hobbyist, who was sent on the Everest expedition by Outside Magazine with the task of writing an article about his experience. In my opinion, people should read Into Thin Air because it is a story about survival, and it consists of valuable lessons about, perseverance, determination, and character.
It was 1996 when Jon Krakauer took a job from the magazine company, Outside, to report on mountain climbing expedition tours which had been raising speculation. Krakauer had a passion for climbing ever since a young age, and he especially had always wanted to climb Everest. He had climbed before, but not altitudes as intense as what he was about to take on. Upon his journey, he found the altitude to be more than challenging. His oxygen intake began decreasing substancially and he could feel himself fading away.
In the article , “ Anatoli Boukreev (Responds to Krakauer) , “ by Anatoli Boukreev, Boukreev discusses Krakauer ‘s accusations against his decisions while hiking up Mount Everest. He defends his arguments by reasoning his decisions with factual evidence and events that occurred during his hike. Boukreev has had over 20 years of experience in climbing and has had built enough credibility to reason why he follows specific routines when hiking mountains such as Mount Everest. Krakauer claims that he had left his current clients to cut and run away from the hike itself , but Boukreev states that his reason for that was to assist fellow climbers and keep them up with the pace that they are currently moving up the mountain in. Another question
In the letter responding to John Krakauer, Anatoli Boukreev addresses the topic of his actions while guiding a group throughout Mount Everest. He argues that Krakauer does not have the amount of experience and he wasn’t as close to the action as Boukreev was. He claims that Krakauer doesn’t have the correct amount of knowledge to make assumptions about his actions on Mount Everest. Boukreev claims that he has a lot more experience than Krakauer does because he has climbed Mount Everest three times and he has overcame seven of the fourteen mountains over 7,000 meters in elevation. He tells the reader that he sensed that there were other problems down the mountain and he wanted to go warn the others about the change of weather that was coming.
According to Britannica, Mount Everest is the tallest mountain that stands at 29,029 feet. Two authors by the name of John Krakaeur, and Erik Weihenmayer both share their personal experiences on how they surmounted their dreams. These men are unremitting, hardworking, and accepting. They both risked their lives in order to conquer what has never been done before. Although it seems illusory, their actions are mesmerizing.
The style of writing has changed drastically in excess of the past years; each person has their own writing modus operandi that helps to get their point from corner to corner or refer to all that jazz that they are trying to portray. Every author seems to have their own unique way of getting their message to their audience, for instance, they might share personal experiences related to their topic or analysis. Some authors might write about something affected them emotionally and influenced them to act a certain way.
Each and every author create a unique way of describing their own encounters that they have had in their life by bringing literary aspects and enriching the experiences from their lives and adding it to the story to place emphasis on the events that have had an impact on their lives. The author creates an emphasis on critical aspects of the story through the tone, where hearing the poet describing their own story gives light to what each poet puts emphasis on their own story and the influences that other people or have had on their lives. Not only does each poet have a unique way of telling a story but also their tone can describe many aspects of their life like what they are, passionate about, the connections that they have had which affects
The style of a writer is reflected in the words they write, whether that be for passages or plays. Samuel Beckett and Edward Albee are two writers that are widely known for their own unique writing styles; both are famous for their symbolic displays of existentialism that leave audiences either deep in thought or completely dumbstruck. With works such as “Act Without Words” and “Imagination Dead Imagine,” both pieces written by Beckett, they are easily comparable to Albee’s work such as “The Sandbox.” Between these two writers, there are several similarities and differences amongst them that are distinguishable through analysis of these popular pieces.
Klinenberg’s compelling use of word choice is displayed all throughout the passage. He says, “What’s indefensible is our habit of converting homes, offices and massive commercial outlets into igloos on summer days.” He uses the word “habit” to reveal to us how often we are prone to rely on air-conditioning to turn our buildings into “igloos”. The negative connotation of the word “habit” forces readers to acknowledge that air-conditioning use is a problem. He uses quotes like “turn down the dial on our own” and “wilt in searing temperatures” to put a certain image in the reader’s mind.
Irish author Oscar Wilde once said “It is the confession, not the priest, that gives us absolution.” This idea is clearly reflected in Edgar Allan Poe’s The Tell Tale Heart (1843), a short story about a man who attempts to convince the reader of his sanity after having confessed to an obsessive act of murder. Similarly so, Wilde’s statement on guilt can also be analyzed in Charles Dickens’ A Confession Found in a Prison in the Time of Charles The Second (1841).