Jonathan Edwards Sermon Rhetorical Analysis

527 Words3 Pages
Evangelicals in the hands of an angry pastor.
Human beings feel the need to be consistently right. We exemplify for what we believe, and want everyone to think as we do. That desideratum drove Jonathan Edwards to write his most acclaimed sermon in American history, which I can only describe as the most devious and manipulative exhortation. Edwards shows an unhealthy demand to get his audience to do as he aforementioned. Exceedingly astute, Edwards conveyed his sermon in the atmosphere he knew it would have a tremendous impact. Jonathan manifest his sermon appealing to create fear and guilt on those who heard it expecting would do as he disclosed, be born again.
Without any validation, Jonathan claimed the hate God had for humans who had not been born again. He testified that God’s anger is greater on those who are standing on earth, over the ones being tormented in hell, compelling his audience with fear. As he proceeded to develop his argument he compared humans with worms, snakes, and spiders, loathsome, abhorrent creatures. Verifying once more the Machiavellian maneuvers Edwards tried to impose on the evangelical church. Consequently he affirmed God’s will is the only reason sinners are not being tormented in hell, creating an
…show more content…
Affirming that they are in a happy state now and rejoicing in hope of the glory of God, this being openly a persuasion technique and his way of aiding his argument. In the final lines it reads, “How awful is it to be left behind at such a day? To see so many others feasting, while you are pining and perishing! To see so many rejoicing and singing for joy of heart, while you have cause to mourn for sorrow of heart, and howl for vexation of spirit!” clear demonstration of how Jonathan intents to affix a forlorn sentiment on the audience, affirming how Jonathan’s sermon is a scheme full of blatant lies, in this struggle to get everyone who believes his deceits to be born
Open Document